Legalized Marijuana and Law Enforcement

Table of Content

Marijuana is the most common illicit drug all over the universe including the United States. It is derived from the foliages. flowers.

seeds and root of hemp sativa. THC. tetrahyrocannabinol is the chief active constituent of marihuana. The drug can either be smoked or mixed with nutrients and drinks.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

In the streets. marihuana is normally known as the herb. pot. marijuana among other names.

There are many side effects. both short term and long term effects associated with maltreatment of marihuana. However. marihuana has besides been used medically in infirmaries.

Legalization of marihuana in the United States has ever attracted a het argument.It is of import to observe that marihuana was non discovered yesterday. For the centuries in which the herb has been used. it has been wholly legal.

It is estimated that marihuana has been illegal for less than one per centum the period adult male has used it. The drug is known to hold been in usage every bit early as 7000 BC but it was made illegal in the United States in the twentieth century. A: History of marihuana The history of marihuana Torahs in the United States is really interesting. The first jurisprudence associating to marijuana or cannabis sativa to be enacted in the modern twenty-four hours America was in 1619 in Jamestown in Virginia.

For many old ages. the works had been in usage for assorted maps such as nutrient. incense. rope among others.

It is besides interesting to observe that the first jurisprudence related to the herb was a ‘must grow’ jurisprudence that required all husbandmans in the settlement to turn the harvest. A husbandman could be taken to imprison or penalize for neglecting to turn the harvest due to it shortage in the part in the eighteenth century. The must turn Torahs were hence in topographic point for more than two centuries. The authorities encouraged the husbandmans to works the harvest due to its importance among the military demands.

However. it is of import to observe that although the works was critical in the 17th and eighteenth century. to an extent of it being used as a legal stamp. the populace was non cognizant of its utilizations as a recreational drug until the early twentieth century ( Inciardi.

1990 ) . In the mid nineteenth century. over two thousand estates of land in the United States was under hemp sativa plantations. The herb was chiefly grown for usage in the fabric industry.

However. the state of affairs changed in the early twentieth century due to the big inflow of immigrants from Central America particularly Mexico.This inflow was triggered by the Mexican revolution in the early twentieth century. Tension was generated between the little graduated table husbandmans and the plantation proprietors due to the handiness of inexpensive labour from Mexican Americans.

The state of affairs was made worse by the fast changing universe in the after math of the First World War and the event of the great depression. The increased tenseness every bit good as the high figure of immigrants from South and Central America made resources scarce and the quality of life in American metropoliss deteriorated significantly.It is of import to observe that when the immigrants from Mexico arrived in the United States. smoke of marihuana for diversion was common in Mexico but it was unheard among the American population.

Consequently. the Mexicans brought with them the herb every bit good as the smoke wont. These Mexican immigrants introduced smoke of marihuana in the United States which resulted into the first jurisprudence forbiding marihuanas in California ( Inciardi. 1990 ) .

Other than the Mexican immigrants usage of marihuana motivating the first jurisprudence forbiding readying of hemp. there were other factors that influenced the passage of the new jurisprudence.Most of import was the usage of the drug by Church of jesus christ of latter-day saintss who had been sent to the Cardinal American state in the early twentieth century. The Mormons came back with marihuana and they were already utilizing it.

The churches reaction to this may hold had a large influence in the passage of the first anti marihuana Torahs in California. Consequently. assorted provinces including Texas. Wyoming.

Washington. and Oregon among other provinces had Torahs restricting the usage of marihuana in the early 1920s. Most significantly. the Torahs were designed to specifically aim the Mexican immigrants who were good known to utilize the drug ( Inciardi.

1990 ) .Compared to other provinces. the eastern provinces did non hold a big figure of Mexican immigrants but the job of marihuana was apparent in the provinces excessively. Analysts have argued that the drug was introduced by Latin Americans and African Americans wind instrumentalists.

Marijuana is believed to hold traveled across the eastern provinces such as Chicago. Harlem and New Orleans. Abuse of marihuana was portion of the wind music public presentation scenes. Racism was besides an of import factor in the passage of the anti marihuana Torahs where the white extremists argued that the herb gave the Negroes and the Latin Americans the bravery to confront the Whites.

During the same period. there were rumours in the populace that the immigrants every bit good as the African Americans were act uponing immature Whites including kids into taking the drug. This was the beginning of the ‘assassin’ narratives of professional slayers under the influence of marihuana. In the 1930s.

the usage of marihuana in the United States was associated with violent behaviours as a consequence of these narratives ( Inciardi. 1990 ) . Equally early as mid 1920s. the United States supported international conventions that regulated marihuanas in the signifier of the Indian hemp.

These conventions included the international opium convention which prohibited exports of Indian hemp to states and provinces in which marihuana usage was illegal. The convention besides required proper certifications that approved the importing of marihuana to such states if it was meant for medical usage. However. the convention did non impact other cabanas merchandises such as fibre which were widely produced in Europe and the United States.

It was believed that the Indian hemp contained higher degrees of THC compared to the European hemp which was chiefly grown for usage in the fabric industry ( Inciardi. 1990 ) .The first anti marijuana federal jurisprudence in the United States was the unvarying provinces narcotic Acts of the Apostless whose first bill of exchange was introduced in 1925 and the concluding bill of exchange was ready seven old ages subsequently. This new jurisprudence sought to present unvarying anti narcotic Torahs throughout the United States.

Following the passage of this jurisprudence. the Federal Bureau of Narcotics was created which encouraged the following on unvarying ordinances. By mid 1930s all the provinces had adopted some Torahs that regulated the production. distribution and usage of hemp merchandises.

The constitution of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics in 1930 increased the concern over the increased usage of hemp in the American population. The agency was headed by Anslinger. one of the most famed anti narcotic reformers in the American history. who argued that marihuana was responsible for the increased violent offenses in the society and irrational Acts of the Apostless.

The agency used both the print media every bit good as the first development movie industry to distribute propaganda against the usage of hemp ( Inciardi. 1990 ) .The Geneva trafficking convention of 1936 is besides an of import convention in the legal history of marihuana. Led by caput of Federal Bureau of Narcotic.

Anslinger. the United States authorities tried to act upon the universe society to criminalize all activities involved in the production. processing. distribution and usage of hemp and opium in the universe unless it is for scientific or medical grounds.

However. the proposal was rejected and merely trafficking of the drug remains illegal internationally.The signatory authoritiess were expected to set up systems within their condemnable justness systems to penalize persons involved in trafficking of forbidden drugs in their states. Due to the failed efforts by the American authorities to act upon the international community.

the functionaries did non subscribe the pact terming it excessively weak to cover with the job at manus ( Inciardi. 1990 ) . The marijuana revenue enhancement Acts of the Apostless of 1937 are considered to be the most important jurisprudence towards the legalisation of marihuana in the United States.The act was penned by Anslinger and sponsored by Robert Doughton.

The rule intent of the measure was to wholly destruct the production. distribution and usage of hemp merchandises in the United States ending it illegal drug concerns. The act besides specified punishments to which persons found in ownership of the drug were to be subjected to. Those found guilty of hemp related offenses were subjected to a five old ages sentence or could be fined up to two thousand dollars.

This was all aimed at increasing the hazards involved in the illegal concern.The act was nevertheless opposed by a big figure of Americans including the American Medical Association who argued that the act imposed revenue enhancement on medical forces utilizing hemp as a prescribed drug. The act besides limited and taxed the production and sale of hemp meant for medical usage. Other than the new Acts of the Apostless being enacted.

the association proposed that the Harrison Narcotics Tax Acts could hold been strengthened to cover with the emerging job of marihuana maltreatment ( Bertram. 1996 ) . Since so. the federal authorities has continuously increased its watchfulness in covering with marihuana among other drugs in the state.

Marijuana in the United States is today controlled by the controlled substance act which is contained in the comprehensive drug maltreatment bar and control act that was enacted in 1970 as an entreaty to the marihuanas revenue enhancement act of 1937. However. the act does non separate between marihuana meant for medical usage or diversion intent and prohibits ownership. production and distribution of big measures of the drug.

Consequently. the federal Torahs treat marihuanas like any other illegal drug with no medical value. Marijuana is hence treated in the same manner as cocaine and heroine.All the controlled substances under the federal are placed in a agenda harmonizing to their belongingss which includes hazard of maltreatment and possible utilizations in medical specialty.

In the controlled substance act. marihuana is non considered to hold any medical value and is rated as a extremely habit-forming substance and hence placed under agenda 1 drug. Although physicians can utilize the first amendment to urge its usage in interventions. under the current federal ordinances.

ordering marihuana is illegal ( Gray. 2001 ) . The Drug Enforcement Administration was besides established to implement federal anti narcotic Torahs in the state.The DEA has over the old ages taken a batch of involvements in the production and usage of medical marihuana.

Furthermore. the bureau has targeted specific persons involved in illegal drugs production and distribution. This chiefly includes the minority races. African Americans and Latino Americans.

who have been found to fall victims of illegal drugs maltreatment. Consequently. the war on drugs has resulted into accusal of institutional racism and racial profiling where the anti narcotic Torahs were designed to aim the minority races.This issue continues to pull argument in the state while the American correctional installations and the condemnable justness systems in general is overwhelmed by the big figure of drug related condemnable instances ( Musto & A ; Korsmeyer.

1996 ) . Although in many instances the drug enforcement disposal leave alone instances affecting medical usage of marihuana. the federal Torahs have punitory punishments against persons found in ownership of marihuana for whatever ground. The drug is considered unsafe.

illegal and with no medical usage.For this ground. the tribunals maintain that an person can non support himself on the footing of medical usage when convicted of marihuana related instances. However.

in many instances. defence lawyers have ever raised the issues during tests. Sentencing is besides an of import legal facet of marihuana in the United States. An accused can either be subjected to the federal sentencing guidelines created in 1987 or the compulsory minimal sentence created in the late eightiess.

In the federal sentencing guidelines. an single accused of marihuanas related offenses is sentenced based on his condemnable record.Under these guidelines. non all marihuanas related offenses wrongdoers are subjected to a jail term.

However. they are all eligible for imprisonment. The guidelines require that the convicted person should function at least 85 per centum of the jail term. The length of the jail term is determined by the sum of marihuana the person is accused of being in ownership.

Low degree offenses can ensue into a sentence of between one month and one twelvemonth probation even in instances where multiple strong beliefs are reported.For illustration. under the guidelines ownership of one kg of marihuana attracts an alternate sentence of 6-12 months probation while two and half kgs and no past record attracts non less than six months imprisonment and up to two three old ages incase of anterior record of drug offenses with no alternate sentence. Although the Judgess continue to be influenced by these federal guidelines in enforcing sentences.

they are no longer compulsory. However. they are supposed to be consultative to guarantee uniformity in condemning ( Bonnie & A ; Whitebread. 1999 ) .

Cases affecting marihuana are besides capable to the minimal compulsory condemning Torahs. The sentences chiefly target persons accused of ownership of immense sums of drugs. For illustration. the minimal compulsory sentence for an single found guilty of possessing one 100 kgs of marihuana or cultivating one hundred workss of hemp is five old ages if he has no drug related offense record and ten old ages if otherwise.

One thousand kgs of workss attract ten old ages imprisonment with no anterior record. twenty old ages with anterior record and life imprisonment in instance of multiple drug offenses.Therefore. drug users and sellers ever avoid possessing one hundred or more kgs of marihuana at any clip to avoid the minimal compulsory sentence of five old ages ( Gray.

2001 ) . Medical Effectss of Marijuana The effects of marihuana on the user have attracted a batch of attending in the past few old ages. There are a good figure of surveies that are still on traveling on the negative every bit good as positive effects of marihuana usage on human organic structure. It is of import to observe that the usage of marihuana for diversion intents has non been widely pronounced in the yesteryear as compared to other drugs.

While narcotic usage day of the months back to over a century. the usage of marihuana has non been really prevailing in the general society until the last three or so decennaries. Consequently. the long term effects of marihuana maltreatment have non been really good documented although there are significant and sensible hypothesis that have been proposed.

It is besides of import to observe that arguably. marihuana has been considered to be among the safest illegal drugs such as heroine and cocaine. It has besides been argued to be safer than some legal drugs such as baccy and intoxicant.Furthermore.

it has been confirmed to hold pharmacological characteristic and accordingly been used as a curative drug for many old ages. It has been used in intervention of people enduring from chronic hurting. Aids. malignant neoplastic disease and other terminal diseases.

Research is besides being carried out to formalize the alleged pertinence in intervention of mental conditions such as anxiousness and station traumatic emphasis upset ( Gruber et al. 2003 ) . While looking at the negative impacts of marihuana on the user. it is besides of import to observe that when used in moderateness.

marihuana does non hold as many harmful effects as intoxicant and baccy.The societal and economic impacts on marihuana could besides cut down significantly if the usage of marihuana is controlled. However. this is non possible when its usage is illegal.

No instances of accidents on the roads have been reported as a consequence of influence of marihuana despite it being the most abused drug in the United States. Furthermore. although the wellness complication associated with intoxicant and baccy has been confirmed. really few have been confirmed in relation to marijuana.

Reports on injuriousness of marihuana on the user have been inconclusive and mare hypothesis some of which are contradictory. Short term effectsThe active constituent in marihuana. THC. is responsible for the short term effects of marihuana experienced by the user.

The chief short term effects of the drug are as a consequence of its effects on the cardinal nervous system. THC is known to adhere to the protein receptor nervus cells in the encephalon. After adhering. the chemical propagate a chemical reaction in the nervous system and produces the short term effects of the drug.

One of the most immediate effects of these chemical reactions is keeping the user’s memory every bit good as larning abilities. After utilizing the drug. the single feels relaxed and may be really chatty.Other pleasant effects of marihuana usage include raising the tempers.

experiencing relaxed and a alteration in the province of consciousness. This is why marijuana users claim to experience more enlightened and philosophical when they are high. These short term effects on the user tableland after 30 proceedingss to one hr and subsidies at that place after. However.

there are groundss of some of the effects enduring for several yearss or hebdomads ( Moore. et Al. 2007 ) . Other short term effects of marihuana include addition in appetite.

waterlessness in the oral cavity. impaired logical thought and decelerate reaction clip.Poisoning with marihuana is besides associated with sickness. occasional confusion.

increased anxiousness and agitation. increased pulse. loss of memory and paranoia or hallucinations. Marijuana users have besides been found to hold bloodspots in their eyes.

inconsistent clip perceptual experience and increased inability to transport out undertakings that require concentration such as runing a machine or drive. The person may besides endure from loss of motive and decreased cognitive abilities doing it hard to larn or get new information.In general. the individual’s ability to larn.

retrieve. do informed judgements. believe critically. work out jobs.

pass on efficaciously and organize constructs is impaired when he is high. Surveies indicate that the hazard of bosom onslaught addition by more than four crease instantly after an person has smoked marihuana. This is because the bosom rate can increase with up to a hundred per centum after utilizing the drug which can be maintained for up to three hours. The increased hazard of bosom onslaught is besides as a consequence of the alterations in the bosom beat.

This hazard increases with age and exposure to bosom diseases ( Gruber et al. 2003 ) .Long term effects While the long term effects of marihuanas are under probe and hence non good known. there is no uncertainty that long term usage of marihuanas have damaging effects on the user’s wellness every bit good as societal life.

The deficient information on long term usage of marihuana is due to the fact that the drug has non been really common to many societies in the universe until late. There is no uncertainty that when marihuana tobacco users are compared to cigarette tobacco users. marihuana tobacco users consume much less cannabis compared to the baccy consumed by coffin nail tobacco users.However.

this does non intend that marihuana smoke has insignificant long term effects compared to cigarette smoke and hence should non be ignored. Recent surveies have found out that there are more hydrocarbons that have possible carcinogenic effects in marihuana compared to tobacco. Furthermore. marihuana tobacco users may be more open to these compounds than baccy tobacco users because marihuana is profoundly inhaled and the fume is held for a longer clip in the lungs compared to tobacco.

This exposes the delicate tissues in the lungs to more carcinogenic compounds increasing the hazard of malignant neoplastic disease ( Mittleman et al. 2001 ) . Surveies have indicated that marihuana usage addition the hazard of malignant neoplastic diseases such a malignant neoplastic disease of the caput and cervix by up to three times. It has besides been confirmed to hold a important part in the development of malignant neoplastic diseases that have traditionally been associated with baccy smoke.

Marijuana fume is believed to hold up to three times every bit much pitch as in baccy fume. Furthermore. it has over twice the figure of possible carcinogenic compounds when compared to tobacco fume.Logically.

this suggests that marihuana smoke has a important addition in the hazard of development of cancerous cells taking to lung malignant neoplastic disease. However. scientific research is afoot to corroborate these hypotheses. Other than marihuanas being a recent drug among the wider population compared to other drugs.

scientific research on its long term effects has been hindered by the little sample that is available due to punitory anti marihuana Torahs in many parts of the universe. For illustrations. most of marijuana perennial users are still excessively immature to hold developed malignant neoplastic disease.However.

although there is no prove. long term marihuana users need to reconsider the hazards associated with the drug ( Hashibe. et Al. 2006 ) .

The effects of long term usage of marihuana in animals’ immune systems are good known. The immune system plays a critical function in protecting the organic structure against harmful micro-organisms. Research in animate beings indicates that the marihuana has a important consequence on the T cells. particularly in the lungs.

Although this has non been confirmed in human existences. there is no uncertainty that it affects the user’s immune systems because the animals’ immune system is similar to that of human existences.While it is expected that marihuana tobacco users excessively have similar respiratory system jobs as baccy tobacco users. it has been observed that bulk of these jobs are more frequent among marijuana tobacco users.

They are more often attacked by thorax colds. coughs. production of emotionlessness. and obstructor of air passages and higher hazard of lungs infections.

This is possible due to the consequence of the drug on the T cells and therefore immune systems in the lungs ( Tashkin. 2005 ) . The long term effects of marihuana on the users generative system is non in uncertainty.This is more serious sing the fact that marihuana is one of the most abused drugs among immature people in the United States.

The active compound in marihuana has been known to hold inauspicious effects on assorted parts of the cardinal nervous system including countries that are responsible for commanding sexual endocrines and growing. Consequently. long term usage of marihuana has been found to cut down the degree of testosterone and other sex endocrines in male. In some instances.

it has been associated with increased muliebrity due to deformation of the endocrine system.It can besides take to sterility. reduced sperm count and increased abnormalcy in sperm cells. Significant instances of sterility in males has for this ground been linked to long term usage of marihuana.

The drug has been seen to hold similar effects in females by changing the hormonal systems taking to irregular catamenial rhythms. However. the change can be reversed but it may take clip. It has besides been found to negatively impact unborn babes who are born with an impaired nervous system.

This consequences into kids with hapless larning abilities. hormonal abnormalities. deficiency of attending and unnatural reactions to different stimulation such as sound and visible radiation ( Moore. et Al.

2007 ) . Long term usage of marihuana is besides associated with mental upsets. One of the greatest negative effects of marihuana usage in an person is its habit-forming effects. The ability of the drug user to develop dependence on the drug has ever been the chief statement used to back up prohibition of marihuana usage.

However. other mental upsets have been associated with long term usage of marihuana.They include toxic psychosis which may make ague degrees. terror onslaughts.

increased aggressiveness which the user is unable to command. flashbacks and psychotic beliefs. paranoia and hallucinations every bit good as some instances of acute depression. Marijuana has besides been suggested to trip other serious mental conditions such as schizophrenic disorder.

These effects of the drug on the mental wellness of an person have been the point of contention between pros and cons of curative usage of marihuana in terminally sick patients ( Moore. et Al. 2007 ) .What are the legal guidelines and province legislative acts of some of the provinces that have legalized marihuanas? The federal and states’ Torahs in the United States varies in relation to medical marihuana.

Harmonizing to the controlled substance act. the federal systems do non acknowledge the medical belongingss of marihuana. However. prosecuting patients or medical practician for utilizing marihuana for curative processs is non a precedence in the federal legal systems.

The federal legal systems recognizes the fact that health professionals may be compelled to utilize medical marihuanas in certain medical instances which is allowed in some provinces.Fourteen provinces have so far legalized medical marihuana usage within their legal power while others gives constabularies or justice discretion to let important decrease in the penalty given to marijuana users for medical grounds. One of the most published provinces in relation to medical marihuana is California where the drug is distributed through dispensaries. It is estimated that medical marihuanas industry in California was deserving two billion dollars in 2008 which attracted over one hundred million dollars in revenue enhancement ( DPA.

2010 ) .Despite bulk of Americans and civil society organisations in America back uping statute law of medical marihuana. the federal authorities has ever rejected the proposals. In 2005.

the Supreme Court made a opinion corroborating that a patient can be prosecuted in the federal tribunal for utilizing marihuana and medical grounds can non be used as a defence. This jurisprudence applies even in provinces that have legalized medical marihuana. Consequently. on several occasions.

dispensaries administering medical marihuanas such as in California have been raided by federal functionaries from the Drug Enforcement Administration.The opinion by the Supreme Court provided an first-class chance for the amendment of the jurisprudence to protect patients and medical marihuana legislative assemblies in different provinces but the measure was one time more rejected by Congress ( DPA. 2010 ) . .

Despite the Congress rejecting the proposal to amend the jurisprudence and legalise medical marihuana. the high tribunal opinion had undistinguished effects on the states’ medical marihuana Torahs. The tribunal did non hold the power to turn over or exert authorization over the provinces statute laws.It is of import to observe that approximately 99 per centum of marihuana related apprehensions are done at the provinces level which makes it possible for statute law in the provinces to protect patients and health professionals.

The province Torahs can afford to efficaciously take all punishments against persons accused of turning. processing. distributing or possessing marihuana for medical grounds. Other provinces have non legalized medical marihuana but have symbolic legislative assemblies that lawfully protect the patient in the province legal systems ( DPA.

2010 ) .From a broad scope of combative issues associating to drug policies in the United States. medical marihuana has received the greatest public support. The American population is skewed towards legalisation of medical marihuanas despite the federal authorities rejecting such proposals.

Scientific surveies have confirmed the medical value of marihuanas in patients with serious terminal diseases such as malignant neoplastic disease. Aids. epilepsy and chronic hurting among others. There is besides documented grounds of marihuana usage in handling assortment of unwellnesss in the ancient universe.

The most comprehensive survey associating to medical marihuana was carried out in 1999 by the institute of medical specialty which concluded that marihuana has potent in the direction of conditions such as loss of appetency. anxiousness and chronic hurting. Assorted professional organic structures and organisations such as the American Public Health Association. the Aids Action Council and the National Association of Attorney Generals have deliberated on legal entree to medical marihuana for patients with certain medical conditions.

The American population has favored the abolition of Torahs forbiding production. distribution and usage of medical marihuana at the province and federal degree. Voters from assorted provinces have over the old ages passed ballot enterprises to force for legalisation of medical marihuana. Over 70 per centum of electors throughout the United States support the proposal to hold legal marihuanas available to medical practicians for prescriptions ( Cassidy.

2002 ) . The point of contention on the legality of medical marihuana has been whether the benefit accrued is less than the hazard involved.There have been many statements on possible shortcoming upon statute law of medical marihuana. For illustration.

inquiries have been raised on whether patients under marijuana prescription would be allowed to drive while under the influence of the drug. how to command the measure the patient uses. the issue of dependence and medical marihuana acquiring into the incorrect custodies. However.

it seems that this is non the chief concern of the federal authorities. The chief ground why the federal authorities has been opposed to legalisation of marihuana for any ground is based on the Drug Enforcement Administration description of marihuana.DEA maintains that marihuana has no medical value and is a extremely habit-forming substance with inauspicious effects on the organic structure such as compromising the immune systems and triping the development of malignant neoplastic disease. The authorities has ignored some research that has confirmed the medical benefits on marihuana ( Cassidy.

2002 ) . Consequences on Law Enforcement What difficulties would Law Enforcement Officers brush if marihuana was legalized? Legalization of marihuana is likely to convey approximately many challenges to the jurisprudence enforcement constructions.This is due to the mutuality of illegal drug markets where about all narcotics go manus in manus. Although some people have argued that marihuana is safer compared to other illegal every bit good as some legal drugs.

its legalisation will in no uncertainty be a stepping rock drug. It will open up production. distribution and usage of other harder drugs which will be debatable to jurisprudence enforcement. Research indicates that progressive usage of marihuana finally leads the user to harder drugs.

Because marihuana is considered a harmless drug. it is used for experimentation by possible difficult drugs maltreaters.After a piece. the user turns to other drugs.

This will be worse if marihuana is made legal. More people will be introduced to it because of its legality and in the long tally. the jurisprudence enforcement will hold a trouble in covering with a much bigger job of harder drugs ( Husak & A ; Marneffe. 2005 ) .

The jurisprudence enforcement bureaus in the United States have enough drug related jobs to cover with. The system ought to hold learnt a good lesson from the legality of drugs such as intoxicant. Road slaughter as a consequence of driving under influence of intoxicant is among the top slayers in the United States.The jurisprudence enforcement has ever had a job covering with minor imbibing and aggressive behaviours associated with alcohol addiction.

Legalizing another drug means added jobs. The dangers associated with rock drive will increase significantly. It is hence incorrect to legalise marihuana because it amounts to a victimless offense. There are many offenses that are associated with marihuana usage such as force and aggressiveness.

Punitive punishments to discourage irresponsible imbibing have proved impracticable which suggests that it will be hard to command marihuana usage if legalized.A device can be used to observe drivers under the influence of intoxicant. but this may non be possible when the driver is driving high. There is no uncertainty that statute law of marihuana will increase offense and load in jurisprudence enforcement ( Husak & A ; Marneffe.

2005 ) . Collaring persons found in ownership of marihuana and other drugs reduces the likeliness of such persons perpetrating offenses. Drug nuts have been associated with minor and serious offenses such as shrinkage. larceny and other belongings offenses to pay for their wonts.

Legalization of marihuana means that there will be more of these drug users in the streets and vicinities. These persons are more likely to perpetrate more serious offenses since the jurisprudence hatchet mans are non obliged to acquire them out of the streets. Furthermore. bulk of liquidators.

rapers and robbers have been found to be drug nuts. By imprisoning these persons for ownership of drugs. they are incapacitated from perpetrating such serious offenses. Common sense dictates bar is better than covering with the end point job.

If there is ground to imprison possible liquidators.

Cite this page

Legalized Marijuana and Law Enforcement. (2017, Sep 07). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront