Persuasive Techniques of Rebecca Solnit and Lesley Kinzel

Read Summary
Summary

In their essays, Rebecca Solnit and Lesley Kinzel both explore the issue of men explaining things to women, even when they don’t fully understand the topic. Both authors agree that this is a common occurrence and that the term mansplaining has been coined to describe it. However, they approach the topic from different angles. Solnit uses strong examples and a sarcastic tone to persuade readers, while Kinzel employs effective rhetorical strategies to appeal to her intended audience, men. Solnit shares a personal anecdote about a party where a man tried to pretend he knew more about her book than she did. She then delves into darker topics, such as rape and murder, to show the serious consequences of men ignoring women’s knowledge. In contrast, Kinzel begins by describing her relationship with her husband and explaining the term mansplaining in a more accessible way. She then appeals to men’s desire to be good allies and encourages them to listen to women’s perspectives. Both Solnit and Kinzel conclude that progress has been made in addressing this issue, but there is still work to be done to create a more equal society.

Table of Content

In their respective works, Rebecca Solnit’s “Men Explain Things to Me” and Lesley Kinzel’s “Why You’ll Never Hear Me Use the Term ‘Mansplain,'” both authors delve into the prevalent occurrence of men offering explanations to women without fully grasping the subject matter. The term “mansplaining” was coined to encapsulate this phenomenon, gaining significant traction in recent times. Despite addressing the same issue, Solnit and Kinzel approach it from contrasting angles. Solnit effectively employs compelling examples to sway readers, while Kinzel utilizes persuasive rhetorical tactics and displays a keener understanding of her male audience’s desires. Commencing her piece with a personal encounter wherein she is condescended by a man, Solnit illustrates how societal expectations and language impact discussions on gender. Both articles shed light on the problem of men expounding upon topics without possessing expertise when interacting with women.

not use the term, and why she believes it is not an effective way to address the issue.Kinzel also addresses the problem of men explaining things to women without fully understanding, but she takes a more empathetic and approachable tone.She acknowledges that this behavior can be frustrating and dismissive, but she believes that using the term “mansplaining” can alienate men and hinder productive conversations about gender dynamics.She suggests that a more constructive approach is to educate and engage with men, encouraging them to listen and learn from women’s experiences.Kinzel emphasizes the importance of empathy, understanding, and open dialogue in creating meaningful change.Solnit and Kinzel both highlight the issue of men explaining things to women without fully understanding, but they have different approaches and perspectives.Solnit’s article is filled with strong examples and a sarcastic tone, while Kinzel’s article focuses on empathy, understanding, and constructive dialogue.

Cite this page

Persuasive Techniques of Rebecca Solnit and Lesley Kinzel. (2018, Feb 04). Retrieved from

https://graduateway.com/persuasive-techniques-of-rebecca-solnit-and-lesley-kinzel/

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront