Close Relationship Sociology and Modernization

Table of Content

Modernization is the procedure in which societal and economic alteration is obtained through industrial revolution. urbanisation and other societal alterations that alters people’s lives. Modernization promotes individuality over the integrity of traditional communities and encourages reason over traditional doctrines. Modernization can hold both positive and negative effects on society and can frequently convey about contention.

The German sociologist Ferdinand Tonnies ( 1855-1937 ) formed the theory of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. Ferdinand Tonnies saw modernisation as the progressive loss of human community ( Gemeinschaft ) . He besides believed that modernisation caused people in modern societies to float apart and personal relationships became more impersonal as people became more self-involved ( Gesellschaft ) . Ferdinand Tonnies theory suggests that … modernness turns society inside out so that people are basically separated in malice of uniting factors ( Macionis. J. . 2006. page 457 ) .

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Large metropoliss provide an first-class illustration of Ferdinand Tonnies theory of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. Peoples pass one another by the 100s on busy metropolis streets every twenty-four hours ; yet. they remain aliens because they ignore each other as they pass. Even trueness and trust becomes issues between friends as persons put their personal demands above others. Peter Berger’s work was greatly influenced by Ferdinand Tonnies theories.

Peter Berger ( 1977 ) identified four major features of modernisation to depict his theory about how modernisation manifests itself.

  1. The diminution of little. traditional communities: instead than life go arounding around household and community it now revolves around engineering and individuality. People born into modern societies may hold the inclination to overlook such a diminution in little. traditional communities because they would hold ne’er lived in or perchance even seen a little. traditional community.
  2. The enlargement of personal pick: instead than following the traditional criterions of life i. e. faith. religion etc. people have the option to take control and take their ain life style. Berger described this procedure as individualisation.
  3. Increasing societal diverseness: instead than conforming to familial or spiritual beliefs people are afforded a more rational. scientific mentality and a combination of socially diverse beliefs and behaviour through societal blending. This diverseness is a consequence of an industrial society’s have oning off of the strong household ties and spiritual beliefs that one time united people from assorted backgrounds.
  4. Orientation toward the hereafter and a turning consciousness of clip: clip is of the kernel for people focused on single addition and an improved life style. “Modern people are non merely forward-looking but besides optimistic that new innovations and finds will better their lives” ( Macionis. 2006. page 446 ) . Agendas in modern society are based on the clip on the clock instead than the rise and autumn of the Sun. Today clip and money go manus in manus. “According to Berger. one index of a society’s grade of industrialisation is the portion of people have oning wristwatches” Macionis. 2006. page 446 ) .

The Gallic sociologist Emile Durkheim ( 1893-1964 ) shared Ferdinand Tonnies’s involvement in societal alterations due to modernisation. Emile Durkheim believed that… “Modernization was marked by an increasing division of labour. or specialised economic activity” ( Macionis. 2006. page 457 ) . Durkheim viewed pre-industrial societies as being held together by mechanical solidarity. Therefore. members of a society who perform the same type of work are fundamentally the same and belong in the same class. “Durkheim’s construct of mechanical solidarity is virtually the same as Tonnies’s Gemeinschaft ( theory ) ( ( Macionis. 2006. page 457 ) .

As a society becomes more modernized the division of labour becomes noticeable. This division of labour is believed to assist unify the modernised society. “To Durkheim. this alteration means less mechanical solidarity but more of another sort of tie: organic solidarity. [ sic ] or the common dependence between people engaged in specialised work” ( Macionis. 2006. page 458 ) .

Durkheim’s position of modernness differed from Tonnies’s in a more complex and positive mode. Harmonizing to Macionis. J. ( 2006 ) : Durkheim viewed modernisation non so much as a loss of community as a alteration from community based on bonds of similitude ( affinity and vicinity ) to community based on economic mutuality ( the division of labour ) .

Max Weber ( 1921-1978 ) viewed modernisation as “replacing a traditional worldview with a rational manner of thinking” ( Macionis. 2006. page 458 ) . Modern societies value efficiency over tradition ; hence. modern people will set to anything that will let them to achieve their aim. Weber labeled this adjustable and unquestioning modern society as disenchanted because people are no longer enchanted by tradition. “The undisputed truths of an earlier clip had been challenged by rational thought. In short. said Weber. modern society turns off from the gods” ( Macionis. 2006. page 459 ) . Weber’s chief concern with modernisation was that scientific discipline would do people to halt oppugning the significance and intent of human being. Weber’s concern leads to the theories of Karl Marx.

Karl Marx viewed modernisation as a capitalist revolution. The Industrial Revolution turned over a powerful and productive control of society to the upper categories. “Marx agreed that modernness weakened little communities ( as described by Tonnies ) . increased the division of labour ( as noted by Durkheim ) . and encouraged a rational worldview ( as Weber claimed ) ” ( ( Macionis. 2006. page 459 ) . Marx implies that capitalists in their pursuit of power tear at the cloth of society by pulling husbandmans and people from little towns into big metropoliss to work in specialised places in mills. Marx saw this as a manner for capitalist economy to boom and the upper categories to line their pockets.

Is modernisation probably to go on in the United States ( U. S. ) and is it a world-wide tendency? Marx theory of modernisation implies that modernisation is the foundation of the Industrial Revolution every bit good as the capitalist economic system. Modernization may non go on in some subdivisions of the United States military. “The Air Force’s modernisation of the onslaught warning systems within Cheyenne Mountain will be more than $ 700 million from financial old ages 2000 through 2006. DOD functionaries have stated that they no longer need to go on runing in this hardened installation sing that the menace of an intercontinental ballistic missile work stoppage in today’s environment is low” ( Agostino. D. . 2007 ) .

However. as long the modern society of the United States associates success with money modernisation is likely to go on. As modernisation continues capitalist economy will boom because more and more little town people will transpose or travel to larger metropoliss for better paying occupations. Modernization is a tendency that is brushing over the full universe. Just like Westernization caught on with the youngest coevals of the clip modernisation gimmicks on with today’s younger coevals as good. Tourism is a life-size modern tendency. Many states have modernized natural land Markss ad cultural countries as tourer attractive forces. For case. Chili has modernized their hot spring countries to pull money from touristry.

Travel industry experts agree that the tendency toward modernisation of Chile’s good luck of holding natural hot springs. combined with the most sophisticated techniques from watering place around the universe. has created demand among foreign tourers. Since 2002. touristry in Chile has grown by 13 % yearly and in 2006 the industry generated US $ 1. 50 billion in hard-currency grosss.

What are the effects of modernisation? Consequences of modernisation may be viewed otherwise based on an individual’s point of position of the alterations that modernisation brings. One individual might state that the upper categories will go on to thrive in this modern capitalistic society while lower categories will fight more as traditional households will hold to work even harder to acquire in front. Another individual might believe that modernisation is the key to conveying societies closer through the blending of society as a whole through industrial engineerings such as computing machines. cyberspace cell phones and so on.

Computers and internet connexions provides more information than of all time before and new. but it besides threatens people’s personal privateness in return. Modern industry has increased productiveness through the usage of machines instead than manpower. but it has besides left many people out of work. Many scientific finds have been made since the oncoming of modernisation from medical specialty that saves lives to arms that take lives. Nuclear power is one such find that brings widespread contention.

Zhang. B. ( 2007 ) noted that… “Since the terminal of the Cold War. the atomic balance of power has shifted enormously in favour of the United States” . The United States atomic arsenal consists of high tech equipment such as atomic missiles stealing bombers and the similar. While the United States strategic atomic force continues to turn stronger Russia’s atomic force is in diminution. With The United States in the lead of modernisation of atomic warfare Americans might happen that a good thing while the Russian society may feel that as a menace.

China’s atomic forces are at a lower limit so they may be considered the least likely menace for atomic war. However. Harmonizing to Zhang. B. ( 2007 ) : The inclination in Washington to disregard China as an inconsequential atomic histrion must be set aside in favour of a clearer grasp of China’s significance. both current and possible. Over the coming decennary. China could really well increase the size. edification. and overall capableness of its strategic force.

As China’s atomic force progresses with the modernisation of atomic weaponry the United States will be in the place where strategic dealingss and a shared apprehension will hold to be made with China or China or China could show a atomic menace to the Unites States. “A shared apprehension of the proper strategic balance of power between the two states will deter an weaponries race and aid stabilise the most of import bilateral relationship of the universe in the 21st century” ( Zhang. B. . 2007 ) . The bottom line is that modernisation can hold both positive and negative effects on society and communicating is the key to hedging unwilled catastrophes.

In decision: Modernization has been defined. Sociological theories have been provided from Ferdinand Tonnies. Peter Berger. Emile Durkheim. Max Weber and Karl Marx about how modernisation manifests itself in U. S. society. It has been noted that modernisation is likely to go on in the United States ( U. S. ) and it is a world-wide tendency. Examples of the effects of modernisation have been provided and it has been proven that modernisation has both positive and negative effects.

Based on the research provided perceptual experiences of modernisation reveal that modernisation is an of all time altering system that has taken a way of its ain. one time a society starts down that way there is no manner of cognizing precisely what will go on. Modernization brings both positive and negative effects into a society.

The Industrial Revolution brings one innovation after another. Some are good and some are bad depending on a person’s position. Modernization gives capitalist economy the upper manus in the universe of economic system while working the working category society. This brings about the diminution of little. traditional communities which will finally weaken the cloth of these little communities. Consequently. Karl Marx’s theory that capitalists in their pursuit of power tear at the cloth of society is likely the closest to uncovering the true perceptual experience of modernisation.


  1. Colorado. E. ( 2007 ) . Hot Fun. Latin Trade ( English ) ; Vol. 15 Issue 9. p52-55. 4p. Retrieved March 10. 2009. from hypertext transfer protocol: //web. ebscohost. com
  2. D’Agostino. D. ( 2007 ) . Defense Infrastructure: Full moon Costss and Security Implications of Cheyenne Mountain Realignment Have Not Been Determined: GAO-07-803R. GAO Reports ; p1. 13p. 1 chart. 1 diagram. 1 graph.
  3. Retrieved March 10. 2009. from hypertext transfer protocol: //web. ebscohost. com
  4. Macionis. J. ( 2006 ) . Society: The rudimentss ( 8th ed. ) . Upper Saddle River. New jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  5. Zhang. B. ( 2007 ) . The Modernization of Chinese Nuclear Forces and Its Impact on Sino-U. S. Relations. Asiatic Affairs: An American Review ; Vol. 34 Issue 2. p87-100. 14p. Retrieved March 10. 2009. from hypertext transfer protocol: //web. ebscohost. com

Cite this page

Close Relationship Sociology and Modernization. (2017, Jul 22). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront