Technology and Politics Sample

Table of Content

In this modern twenty-four hours and age. engineering has become a major influence in our life. In the past decennary. we have had a important sum of technological progresss in society that revolves around all facets of society. Specifically. engineering has allowed for ways for persons to publicize information and show their personal sentiments. With progresss like overseas telegram telecasting. holding tonss of different intelligence mercantile establishments. and another progress. the Internet. it has become really easy to air prejudice. stereotypes. and personal sentiment internationally. Are these societal mercantile establishments needfully accurate? Make these Internet sites affect the political sentiments of our states youth? The Internet creates a negative influence on the political lives of immature electors because it is damaging to the development of immature informed electors.

The Internet is a huge. unfastened web where users create and portion media such as pictures and images. information. personal sentiments. and thoughts publicly for others to theorize on. Examples of these sites are Facebook. Twitter. YouTube. Google. Wikipedia. and assorted blogging pages where on-line media can be accessed 24/7. Statistically. within the age group of 18-24 around 98 % of these immature grownups are already utilizing societal media. Besides. there is an norm of 70 billion new pieces of content shared on Facebook each month and an unbelievable 2. 9 billion hours spent watching pictures uploaded to YouTube. In the United States entirely. the mean sum of clip spent on the Internet is 7. 6 hours per month ( Social Networking Statistics ) .

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Social media mercantile establishments and common hunt engines are. for the most portion. being used by the young person of the universe and it has limitless sums of information that they can entree. Many of these sites. nevertheless. have tainted information. and rapidly turn fact into personal sentiment. Because these sites are accessible by anyone. the information that is being advertised can be edited by anyone. which allows for tainted information and misinformed audiences. These sites are treated as an accurate resource and are used by immature electors to voice their sentiments. However. what might be deemed accurate political information has potential to be straight-out bias information. This limits the sum of true information that immature electors can entree making the potency to be a less informed elector.

The dependability of the Internet is a controversial issue and it is that ground that one can non swear everything they read on it. Many users of the Internet might reason that on-line information. whether it is streamed through societal media. hunt engines. web logs. or ads is in copiousness. This allows for a assortment of sentiment and accurate information for the user to entree. Major sites such as: Google. Twitter. or YouTube. can be used by typing in any term and immediately having 1000s of pages full of information on any possible subject conceivable. With an plus every bit efficient as Internet resources. which gather information with easiness. it would look as if they allow immature electors to go accurately informed electors ; nevertheless. this is non true. Many users who rely on these sites for their political demands will come across information that is an unfastened beginning to the populace. The sites viewable by the public allow anyone to entree them. nevertheless. merely because they are accessible does non intend that the information is right.

Major online sites such as Google. Wikipedia. WikiAnswers. Answers. com. YouTube. Facebook Pages and Twitter really confine users to information that they are comfy with and already cognize. even if it is non politically accurate. This limits immature electors to information that will non let them to do educated determinations or go an informed citizen. Many of the these mercantile establishments mentioned earlier be given to model to your perceptual experience of what is common cognition to the spectator. For illustration. while watching pictures. YouTube makes note of the picture you are sing and based off this information the site will urge pictures that fit your profile. When watching a pro Obama run media mercantile establishment on YouTube. there are many other facets that relate to advancing the Democratic Party and their values. As seen on this specific picture ( President Clinton Explains Mitt Romney’s $ 5 Trillion Tax Cut ) . there is a little nexus that takes you straight to Obama’s functionary YouTube page. every bit good as a important sum of picture associating to the Democratic Party and the Obama run.

Another point to take away from this picture is that former Democratic president Bill Clinton. is defaming current Republican campaigner Mitt Romney. and non associating to the current Democratic campaigner Barack Obama at all. It is besides evident that there is no intimation of right flying media on this YouTube page. This doesn’t let the immature elector the ability to see both sides of this political statement. but instead inhibits him in his political sentiments. As a consequence. this media mercantile establishment limits all 682. 000 viewing audiences who have watched this picture from being informed electors in a huge democracy. Another illustration of Internet sites restricting political point of views is the personalization of the Google hunt engine. Google and other major companies have inclinations to sophisticate hunt consequences to model to single thoughts. Eli Pariser. writer of The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. stated in an academic argument aired on NPR that. “these companies aren’t blind to the phycology… they have read all of the surveies that show that when you present people with information that confirms what they already believe was true. you can really see explosion of pleasance in peoples encephalons. ”

With these psychological surveies readily available to them. it would merely look natural for large corporate companies to sophisticate the hunt engines to suit your beliefs ; in most instances. they do. Pariser goes a measure further claiming that “there has been a survey. the lone equal reappraisal survey that I am cognizant of. on Google hunt consequences and the affects of personalization that shows that 60 % of the hunt consequences on the front page are normally personalized” ( NPR: Intelligence Squared “Is The Internet Closing Our Minds Politically? ” ) . For illustration a immature elector. whose recent hunt history tilts towards right flying political orientation. hunts about the 2012 political runs. Statistically. around 60 % of their first page on their Google hunt will associate to right flying political orientation and pro Romney run advertisement. This on-line hunt engine by and large limits the mean immature elector to information that they are comfy with and already believe. reassuring them that their political beliefs are right. making immense prejudices against the other party. This allows for farther isolation from a all-around apprehension of modern twenty-four hours political relations and opposing political ideals. normally negatively impacting the political consciousness of immature electors.

Bing an informed and cognizant elector is indispensable to the United States because as a democratic state the populace has immense power when it comes to political elections. Understanding current political issues and elections are an indispensable portion of being an American citizen. Through remaining informed. you are leting yourself the chance to organize your ain sentiments and understand what politicians stand for. This manner when it comes to voting as an person. you are more politically cognizant of who to vote for and who will really run into the demands that you as an single deem of import. It might look like a arduous undertaking. nevertheless. in the United States the populace has a say in who remains in offices of power and how they will direct our state politically. Legislation affects all of us as persons so it merely seems necessary to go more cognizant of the political society that surrounds us.

Jason Zinser. professor at University of North Florida. claimed in his academic essay. “The Good. The Bad. and The Daily Show” that. “an informed populace is the lubricating oil that keeps democracy running decently. Although foreign and domestic issues aren’t settled by popular ballot. an informed public wields great democratic power” ( 364. Gerald Graff. et. Al ) . It is necessary for younger electors to research all facets of political argument to make their ain thoughts. Without their ain educated sentiment. they will most likely non be able to reflect an informed elector. Technology. specifically major online sites. bounds immature electors abilities to go informed political persons. It seems necessary for immature electors to hold an unfastened head when it comes to political relations. showing likes and disfavors. and making their ain personal beliefs so that they so can do informed determinations that will impact the states hereafter. However. the ways common on-line media and information outlets’ are normally designed allow for viewing audiences to see constructs that they already understand. believe. and will most likely limit their assortment of media due to personal penchant. It is really easy for immature electors to associate what they already know to a media mercantile establishment that is reiterating their beliefs. Ultimately. the dominant information mercantile establishments on the Internet bound political consciousness in the immature elector population.

Plants Cited

Graff Gerald. Cathy Birkenstein. and Russel Durst. They Say. I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W. W. Norton & A ; . 2010. Print.

Pariser. Eli. Siva Vaidhyanathan. Evgeny Morozov. and Jacob Weisberg. “Is The Internet Closing Our Minds Politically? ” Interview. Audio web log station. N. p. . 23 Apr. 2012. Web. 12 Nov. 2012

“President Clinton Explains Mitt Romney’s $ 5 Trillion Tax Cut. ” YouTube. YouTube. 16 Oct. 2012. Web. 12 Nov. 2012. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=mB7I0vpwT7M & gt ; .

“Social Networking Statistics. ” Statistic Brain. N. p. . n. d. Web. 12 Nov. 2012. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www. statisticbrain. com/social-networking-statistics/ & gt ; .

Cite this page

Technology and Politics Sample. (2017, Aug 04). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront