We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Unethical Practices of Arthur Anderson

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAP) were not observed nor enforced; Arthur Anderson soaked/ condoned Enron to issue shares “as an increase to shareholders equity’ through the use of notes receivables. One should note, that only with the use of cash could this “transaction” be deemed valid. A lack of internal controls within the company and a conflict of interest were present and in uniform, unfortunately, this information was never made known to Enron’s audit committee.

Arthur Andersen added to Enron’s demise by herding company audit documents, this act alone confirmed all suspicions of Arthur Andersen’s consulting and auditing deficiencies; AAA was convicted of obstruction of justice; a once prestigious name known for its quality accounting is now irrefutably tarnished.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Unethical Practices of Arthur Anderson
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Ultimately, Arthur Andersen helped to devastate investor confidence in the financial markets by abandoning its legal duty to public shareholders and by favoring the interests of its clients. I. E. Enron, World, Waste Management, and Sunbeam.

What was the prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen’s audit partners on the Enron, World, Waste Management, and Sunbeam audits: the public interest or something else? Cite examples that reveal this motivation.

Revenue! Money was clearly the prime motivation behind the decisions of Arthur Andersen’s audit partners. However unlikely, Arthur Anderson managed to push company boundaries and employ tactics of a blind eye and a deaf ear within companies such as Enron, World, etc. With that being said, one should not fall under the impression that AAA acted alone or solely arranged for these occurrences I. . Enron and World bankruptcies to take place; clients were also at fault! According to Barbara Lye Toffee, ‘ ‘When Bernardino (Ass CEO) would get up at a partners meeting, all that was ever reported in terms of success was dollars. Quality wasn’t discussed. Content wasn’t discussed. Everything was measured in terms of the buck… Joe was blind to conflict. He was the most aggressive pursuer of revenue that ever met” (Brooks, L J. (2007). In addition, one should note that there were warnings of a disaster waiting to happen; why did AAA leaders allow Bernardino o make such crucial “sensitive” decisions?

Were they not aware that Bernardino, had every motive to incur revenue no matter the cost? According to the text, Bernardino “was most likely to subject to the influence of the client” (Brooks, L J. (2007). Because AAA chose to ignore obvious red flags within internal controls, the company faulted and the big 5 soon became known as the only 4. Some observers even speculate that company divisions were at competition amongst themselves specifically AAA auditing and consul Ting divisions.

Why should an auditor make decisions in the public interest rather than in the interest of management or current shareholders? An auditor’s loyalty and focus must be directed towards meeting and serving the publics interest rather than the interest of management and/or current shareholders for both legal and ethical reasons. It would be unethical to partake in any kind of manipulations, falsify information, and to purposely mislead investors for personal gains. Thankfully, the Serbians and Solely Act manifested itself right after the Enron and World schemes.

Finally, accessibility is not limited to only auditors; management and the board of directors Will be held accountable as well; internal controls will finally be enforced! Section 302: requires senior management to certify the accuracy of the financial statements. Section 404: requires both management and auditors to establish internal controls and reporting methods on the adequacy of those controls. (Investigated. Com) In short, by thinking short-term and not proportioning the publics interests over one’s own selfishness could have detrimental effects on our economy and irreversible effects on the livelihood of many stakeholders.

Consider how many jobs will be lost, how retirement plans that were meant to secure a families future will suddenly vanish, how bad our economy will suffer, companies; remember the domino effect! Be warned that these acts of misconduct will not go unpunished; imprisonment and/or fines will be exercised!

Cite this Unethical Practices of Arthur Anderson

Unethical Practices of Arthur Anderson. (2018, Feb 09). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/unethical-practices-of-arthur-anderson/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page