A Comparison of Discipline Models
Wong’s Pragmatic Classroom Kagan, Kyle, and Scott’s win-win discipline Morrish’s Real Discipline Compare and Contrast
- Students are given the choose to what they feel is good for them to do.
- Students, teacher and parents are involved in the rule making.
- Help students understand each other’s responsibilities along with what the teacher’s responsibilities are.
- Discipline is something that the win-win problem doesn’t do to students.
- Corrects the situation which allows the students to come up better actions which will result in acceptable behavior.
- According to Morrish’s real discipline children can only learn SELF DISCIPLINE through experience.
- Morrish further states that when children enter school they do not have the knowledge on behaving properly.
- With the Three theories they all have the similarity that the teachers and students are involved in the learning process of the required discipline. Strengths
- Students, Teachers and parents all work together to establish the rules to have a better school experience.
- Teachers help students behave which is acceptable behavior to their teacher.
- Win-win discipline is to help students develop log-term, self-managed responsibility.
- Morrish rewards occasionally the students for behaving correctly.
- Morrish gives students courage that they may not have when working through issues that are sensitive. •
• There is too much compromise between teacher and student when establishing the classroom rules.
• Teachers are too limited on what they can do to prevent disruptions.
• The program is most effective if it is implemented from the first day of school until the last day of school.
• Morrish overstates the role of the teacher. “The because I said so” response. • Morrish believes that teachers who praise children to build up their self-esteem actually do more harm than good.
• Morrish is against giving students the freedom to choose…. [continues] Read full essay