In Suzanne Britts essay Neat People vs. Sloppy People. she carefully and humorously compares the two kinds, I personally enjoyed her interpretations very much. in her opinion, the variation was not merely the differences in preferences in cleanliness, but in morality, She states, Neat people are laZier and meaner than sloppy people. This is a bold statement, assuming that all neat people are lazy and mean, when some may beg to difler. Others consider sloppy people to be lazy ones. Her description of sloppy people I particularly enjoyed. At this point in time if Britt entered my dorm room, she would immediately identify my roommate and l as sloppy people. According to Britt, there is a very understandable reason to my untidiness, in her words, Sloppy people, you see, are not really sloppy. Their sloppiness is merely the unfortunate consequence of their extreme moral rectitude.
This means, despite my mothers constant nagging about my lack of cleanliness, this slack in tidiness iustifies what a great, ethical person I am. I Will have to remember this the next time lam at home long enough to create the type of mess Britt describes. lt WIII be my valid excuse, my justification, Britt describes neat people as being burns and clods at heart. She says they see every meaningful thing, such as family heirlooms, as potential dust catchers that must be disposed of as quickly as possible, there is one point in which I disagree with Britt. My grandmother is one of the most immaculate people Ive ever encountered in my life. Britt says that clean people are wasteful and place the neatness above everything including economics. My grandmother saves every plastic container, whether it once held butter, sour cream, or whipped cream. The author wrote that neat people would throw away all empty containers.
Britt states, I knew a neat person once who threw away a perlectly good dish drainer because It had mold on it. This was a contrast to her explanation of neat people. If they truly were as she described, they would not allow the mold to gather. Overall, Britt delivered her purpose of distinguishing her opinion of the difference between sloppy and neat people. Her inventive way of contrasting the two by their morality differences made the seemingly boring topic rather interesting. Being, of the two. one of the sloppy people, her interpretation of me was strikingly valid. Britt ingeniously contrasted sloppy people and neat people in a memorable way.
It’s important to note that the essay presents these characteristics in a light-hearted and humorous manner, using generalizations for illustrative purposes. Not all individuals fit neatly into these categories, and people’s attitudes towards cleanliness and organization can vary greatly. The purpose of the essay is not to label or judge individuals based on their neatness or sloppiness but to explore the contrasting perspectives and approaches people have towards orderliness. It highlights the humor and quirks associated with both types, encouraging readers to reflect on their own tendencies and consider the different ways people navigate their environments.
