Abortion has been one of the most favored and argumentative topics that has still yet to be resolved. In the long run the question we are able to ask when trying to answer this problem is whether or not pregnant women should have the right to kill an unborn baby. Abortion is prior of a pregnancy before birth takes place and is a upstanding wrong. Can we as a community call ourselves human if we let the passing of fetal babies to take place? Those who take the side of pro-choice or as also known as pro-abortion frequently utilize declarations regarding existence, mankind, human privledge and independence to bear their claims. I rest assure abortion must be illegal because we as a society must guard the human lives that are in endangerment. They proceed by expressing that abortion is directlly a procedure that brings an end to pregnancy, not a life. This is an obvious misunderstanding because the term embryo mentions humans at specific states of evolution.agree completely that the fetus, or the human embryo, is in fact a living being. Moreover, human embryo is the “same” as human beings except, the difference between these two is that the embryo is not a full human person because the fetus is not fully developed yet. Every new life, whether it be animal or human, begins at conception. With this being said, no matter what the circumstances of conception, no matter how far along in the pregnancy, abortion, in my opinion, always ends the life of an individual human being. Abortion destroys the lives of helpless and innocent babies that have not done anything wrong.
Everyone is raised knowing the difference between right and wrong. Murder is not ok, so why is not abortion? These protectors of abortion argue that it is not murder if the child is unborn. So, why is it that if an infant is destroyed a month before the birth, there is no problem, but if killed a month after birth, it is considered as inhumane murder? They are not bubbles in a state of development, but preferably humans growing to be prepared for life. This simple bubble or embryo that people believe is okay to destroy is literally so far a composite form of a human. Beforehand the trimester stage the baby will have all its body parts needed for the rest of his or her life. In spite of countless scientific and medical textbooks agree that human life begins at conception, people are still doubtful whether or not our science is correct. But if we are truly uncertain when life starts, it still does not give us the right to destroy a possible life. Why must we doubt thousands of intelligent scientists who agree that life begins at conception because of religious beliefs? Can you truly say it is okay to kill a life because people’s religious beliefs? No matter how much better it sounds defining abortion as terminating pregnancy, in the end a heartbeat is stopped, and a life is not able to continue. Those who support abortion often overuse the claim that every individual has the right to choose and it is unfair to restrict a women’s choice on abortion. Although this claim at first thought may seem to be able to uphold the abuse of abortion, we ….Abortion is an extremely difficult issue and one that many people can have very strong feelings for on both sides of the debate. Those who support abortion rights argue that it is a woman’s choice what to do with her body. Although, the unborn baby inside a woman is still a person living, and terminating that pregnancy is the same thing as murder. No one should have the choice to commit murder. Abortion is honestly wrong because the laws prohibiting abortion help to keep people from playing God.
The purpose of this essay is to set out an argument the claim that abortion, except perhaps in instances, is seriously wrong. One reason for these exceptions is to remove from reflection cases whose social examination should be at issue detailed for clear-headed the opposition of abortion. Such cases include abortion after rape and abortion during the first two weeks days after fertilization when there is an argument that the fetus is not definitely an independent. Another cause for making these exceptions authorize for those cases in which the acceptable of abortion is occur together with the argument of this essay. Such cases include abortion when ongoing of a pregnancy puts at risk a woman’s life and when the fetus is senseless. I mean by an abortion an action intended to bring about the death of a fetus for the sake of the woman who carries it.
For 2015, CDC reported 638,169 abortions from 49 of the 52 reporting areas. Our babies at 8 weeks will smile at us and suck their thumbs. There is evidence that they will use their thumbs and they can dream. They recoil from pain, the ability from sonograms that doctors need to draw blood samples and use the needle, the baby will pull back because all major organs are functioning. Why? A nervous system has developed and the brain that receives signals. That it HURTS. By 21 weeks a baby with just a little help a baby can live outside the womb. Stasticially speaking majoirty of abortions are not taking place because your life is in danger or rape is purely around of conveince. Mary Elizabeth Williams states in her article, So what if abortion ends life? That “Yet I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying human life inside of me. I believe that’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesn’t make me one iota less solidly pro choice.” That’s ridiculous. Who chooses whose life has the most value? Who gets that ability? The baby might be in the woman’s body, but the baby is not the woman’s body. It has his own DNA, own functioning kidney, own genetic code, own blood type, own functioning brain and it’s own DREAMS. Almost everyone who is pro-choice says, “it’s her body, her choice” No, it’s not. By that logic, if a woman attempts to commit suicide, no one should stop her because it’s “her body” therefore “her choice” to end it. No one can do anything they want with their own bodies, there are limitations, so that argument is irrelevant.
When anyone sees a pregnant woman drinking or smoking, everyone tells them they shouldn’t because it will harm the baby, right? Some say the fetus (baby) is part of the mother, but it is not, and I have scientific proof. A baby inside the mother has 23 chromosomes from the mother AND 23 chromosomes from the father. And, the baby doesn’t even have to be a female like the mother is, the baby can be a male. And, the majority of the time the baby has a different blood type then the mother. The baby doesn’t even touch the mother during pregnancy because the baby is in an amniotic sac. Patients who receive a transplant have to take a medication that suppresses the immune system. If they do not take this, the body will attack and kill the tissue in the donor’s organ, because it will not recognize it as its own, because it has a different DNA. Since the baby has different DNA from the mother, the body would recognize it as an intruder. Because of this, the mother’s body would kill and remove the baby itself, which is why the baby is in an amniotic sac. Also, if you’re asking“what if she was raped?” If the mother was raped and can not take care of the baby, there is something called adoption. If someone says that a fetus (baby) is not of equal value to anyone else, because they aren’t as developed or because they are smaller, that is not justifiable at all. A newborn baby is not as developed as a 28 year old. A newborn baby is not as big as a 28 year old. So, by your reasoning, it should be legal to kill newborn babies, right? “About 15,000 abortions are attributed to rape and incest — representing 1.5 percent of all abortions.” – US abortion statistics. This shows that the majority of abortions are not caused by rape. Most abortions are done because people say they “are not ready to have children” If you are not ready to have children, they why are you engaging in premarital sex? Anyone who engages in premarital sex knows that one of the consequences of that is that you might get pregnant. You are going to punish an innocent human being because of a mistake that you caused. I like to back up my position on abortion with facts and scientific evidence. I don’t bring up religion, because I know that the majority of people who are pro-choice are not religious. If you bring religion into the debate, they will not take you seriously because you are coming from a religious standpoint. These, and many more are the reasons why I am pro-life.
It’s not the same. It’s so detached from rational thought. Our elected democratic republic gets to tell us all sorts of things that we can and cannot do. How unhuman our elected president Trump had the nerve to say, “The baby is born. The mother meets with the doctor. They take care of the baby. They wrap the baby beautifully, and then the doctor and the mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby.” It was misleading information he delivered, but it wasn’t the first time. Right now they are telling us we can murder babies. In the article, “Why Do More People Choose Abortion Over Adoption?” Kristi Burton Brown stated: “In the USA, there are approximately two million infertile couples waiting to adopt, many times regardless of the child’s medical problems such as Down Syndrome, Spina Bifida, HIV infection or terminally ill. Dr. Brad Imer, president of America’s pregnancy helpline, confirms the challenge of waiting couples by stating: only 1% of the helplines annual 40,000 clients inquires about adoption.” Parents are waiting at all times to adopt a baby.
