Argumentative of leadership style

Read Summary
Summary

The concept of leadership involves having a vision and an influential relationship with subordinates to direct them towards achieving the vision. Different leadership styles produce different results in an organization. The author argues that democratic leadership would result in greater productivity in the workplace. This is because democratic leadership is participatory, allowing everyone to share their ideas while maintaining the final decision. It also motivates members to perform better as their suggestions are considered and they feel a sense of responsibility. Furthermore, democratic leadership empowers group members and fosters a better working relationship that leads to productivity. However, some counter arguments include conflicts arising from too many ideas and leaders being too lenient in offering rewards and appreciation. Despite this, the author believes that democratic leadership encourages greater participation, motivation, and empowerment, resulting in greater productivity in the workplace.

Table of Content

ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY ON LEADERSHIP A leader is one who keeps the vision in front of the people. He is also one who has an influential relationship with his subordinates so as to direct them towards the vision. Different leadership styles would affect an organization differently, perhaps producing different results. As for me, I think the democratic leadership would result in greater productivity in the workplace. Firstly, democratic leadership is participatory. This means that leaders allow everyone to share ideas, input or suggestions while maintaining the final cession.

Since the group members may possess various skills and abilities, the leader capitalists on them to bring out contributions of higher quality. Secondly, another argument for democratic leadership is that there is more motivation for performance. This is because members feel they are appreciated as their suggestions are considered. Also, with involvement comes a sense of responsibility. This ultimately creates a positive environment for better job performance and productivity. The third argument is that democratic leadership offers empowerment to group members.

There is a sense of trust and respect between the members and their leader. As a result, there will be better working relationship that leads to productivity. However, some arguments against democratic leadership would be that ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’. With many different ideas and opinions, conflicts and misunderstanding can result. This can dampen motivation and work performance. Another counter argument is that democratic leaders are too lenient as they offer reward and appreciation freely.

These may cause embers to be laid back as there is no pressure to perform. Nevertheless, ‘two heads are better than one’. It is better to have members that contribute than to have none. As for the second counter argument, non-performing individuals will gradually get involved when they see others becoming successful. In conclusion, democratic leadership encourages greater participation, motivation and empowerment to members. Therefore, in my opinion, democratic leadership will definitely result in greater productivity in the workplace.

Cite this page

Argumentative of leadership style. (2018, Mar 22). Retrieved from

https://graduateway.com/argumentative-essay-of-leadership-style/

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront