We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Assignment Samantha Smith

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

The fifth Defendant is found only 49% at fault or less, the Plaintiff is awarded nothing. Mind. Code Ann. 5 34-11-2-4 Sec. 4. States that “An action for  injury to person or character,  injury to personal property; or  forfeiture of penalty given by statute; must be commenced within two  years after the cause of action accrues.

Statement of Facts

Samaritan Smith was shopping at a local grocery store in Indiana a few months ago and had an accident. She slipped and fell on some shampoo that had leaked out of one of the bottles.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment Samantha Smith
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

The day Samaritan fell, the employee in charge of the aisle inspection was an older gentleman with glasses. The shampoo on the floor was a clear gel. The store alleges that Samaritan had a duty to avoid the spill in the aisle. The store claims that she is at much as fault as they are. Further, they allege that she was too distracted by her 2-year-old son in the cart, who was misbehaving, to notice the floor.

Question Presented

Can Samaritan recover for her injuries under Indiana law? Can the grocery store be liable for Cantata’s injuries under Indiana law?

Brief Answer

Ms. Smith can recover but will need many months of physical therapy. Not 100% reliable. Applicable statute- Mind. Code Ann. 5 34-11-2-sec. 4. States that “An action for (1) injury to person or character, (2) injury to personal property; or (3) forfeiture of penalty given by statute; must be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues

Discussion

The Indiana grocery store can deny that they were at fault by saying Ms. Smith was too distracted by her son and could have seen the spill on the floor.

This brings up a comparative fault that can allow a jury to consider. If Ms. Smith says that she was at part fault, then the jury can find a percentage of fault to go to both parties.

Conclusion

The grocery store denies that they are at fault, they can say that she had seen the shampoo, was distracted by her son, and avoided it, it will be tough to argue that case only because it was just checked at 1: app. M. Also we can argue that the spill was clear which is tough to see on the floor and that that looks down while shopping for groceries on the floor.

Cite this Assignment Samantha Smith

Assignment Samantha Smith. (2018, Jul 02). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/assignment-samantha-smith/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page