The issue of mercy killing or clemency violent death is a subject of broad argument in the universe for a long clip. Particularly in the state that euthanasia is illegal as Thailand. It is an of import issue because it involves morality. attitude and effects feelings of other people in society. Although it argues that mercy killing may do offenses. destroy critical societal values and it is prohibited in Buddhism ; nevertheless. it should be legalized in Thailand because mercy killing can salvage payment of relations.
right to life and decease should be self determination of patients. and most of people can accept it if it is allowed by the medical and nursing organisation.
It has been argued that clemency violent death may do other offenses. Such as organ trade or killing for heritages. Mercy killing has to be committed by good will to let go of patients from torment. but no standard can state what good will is. ? It is claimed that decease should be natural.
However. in our society. it is accepted that mercy killing can salvage payment of relations. Particularly in the hapless household that barely has adequate money for nutrient and besides has hopeless patient on the same clip. They have to take clemencies killing because they are hapless. And it is purpose of patients to decease because they do non desire to be a load of their household. Furthermore. variety meats from hopeless patients can be utile for others. but for utilizing those variety meats. it has to be a permission of patient to donate it for others non permission of a physician.
Harmonizing to the mercy killing debated by the Vancouver Sun in June. 2006. clemency killing would destruct critical societal values and symbols of human life. How people die could non merely a private ego finding. but it involves other people and society. Euthanasia of a critical individual can convert others to make the same. and it can make a inquiry “what is intending of human life? ” if we can destruct our life easy. However. O De Schutter said about the European Court of Human Rights pronounced in Pretty V. The United Kingdom instance ( 2002 ) that “The right to life creates the right to self finding in the sense of confabulating on an single the entitlement to take decease instead than life. ” It means people have the right to take decease or life by themselves because it is the right of single.
Buddhists believe that killing regardless of motive or non. is prohibitory because it is a wickedness. In forbidden 5 regulations of Buddhist. the first regulation is “do non kill others. ” It covers both worlds and animate beings although it is self-decision to kill themselves even in the hopeless instance that the physician allows to decease. However. harmonizing to the research on the attitude of Thai attorneies about mercy killing by Chulalongkorn University ( 2001 ) . most of people believe that mercy killing can be done if the medical and nursing organisations is responsible it. The physician is competent to judge whether a patient’s instance is hopeless and the physician should joint a patient and relations to make up one’s mind for mercy killing. It shows that many Thai attorneies accept euthanasia. society have to follow and accept that present has changed.
In decision. mercy violent death should be legalized. or at least mercy violent death should be allowed in the hopeless instance who wishes to decease and physicians. including relations. agree with it. Mercy killing lessenings family’s money for hopeless instances. patients have right to take life and decease. and if mercy violent deaths are allowed by professional physicians. most of people can accept it. It is true that Thailand is Buddhist civilization and clemency violent death is prohibitory. However. we must recognize that all life have right to take their manner of life. including decease. No 1 wants to be a condemnable because of perpetrating mercy killing from good head. If Thailand has good certain standard for clemency violent death and be legalized to perpetrate mercy killing. it can be utile for hopeless patients. their relations and all relevant people to perpetrate a last want of hopeless patients from a merciful head.
Cite this Euthanasia Should Be Legalized in Thailand Sample
Euthanasia Should Be Legalized in Thailand Sample. (2017, Jul 19). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/euthanasia-should-be-legalized-in-thailand-essay-sample-1093/