Get help now

External and Internal Validity

  • Pages 2
  • Words 316
  • Views 63
  • dovnload



  • Pages 2
  • Words 316
  • Views 63
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    External and Internal Validity

                Babbie refers to internal and external validity as the two indispensable issues in any sociological research design. In general terms, “internal validity refers specifically to whether an experimental treatment / condition makes a difference or not, and whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim” (Campbell & Stanley 40). Furthermore, external validity is directly linked to statistical generalizations; external validity determines the applicability of the research results to more general social groups.

     Babbie is extremely accurate with the choice of sociological terms: in his book, internal and external validity issues are expressed through “external and internal invalidity”, which threaten the relevance of any sociological research results. Babbie’s list of the internal invalidity sources includes history, maturation, testing, and instrumentation (238). Statistical regression is another internal validity problem. Rooted in the wrong choice of subjects, statistical regression threatens the internal validity. The choice of subjects with extreme characteristics initially distorts the design and objectives of any sociological research. The list of external validity threats includes “multiple treatment interference, reactive effects of experimental arrangements and interaction effects of selection biases and the experimental variable” (Campbell & Stanley 41).

    Internal invalidity issues in sociology can be resolved by means of probability statistics. The methods of selecting the research subjects, the problems of maturation and regression are easily solvable within the boundaries of the probability logic. In contrast, logic will not help eliminating external validity threats: we cannot logically evaluate the impact and the essence of all external conditions. We can improve external validity by using concept mapping and the principles of proximal similarity (Trochim). Replication of the study will substantially facilitate generalization of the research results.

    Works Cited

    Babbie, E. The Basic of Social Research, 4th edition. Wadsworth Publishing, 2007.

    Campbell, D. & Stanley, J. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research.

    Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1996.

    Trochim, W.K. “External Validity.” 2006. Research Methods. 02 June 2008.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    External and Internal Validity. (2016, Oct 23). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy