Less than ten years ago, drones were rarely discussed. However, they are now the subject of extensive debate. It is worth noting that these unmanned aerial vehicles have become crucial in the War on Terror, something that may have seemed unimaginable before. The U.S. military and various government agencies use drones to protect individuals and save money. Despite this, there are critics who oppose their use.
People are concerned about the usage of drones in overseas combat and domestic surveillance, making it a prominent issue in national politics with worries over safety and privacy. General Atomics Corporation is a leading company in aerospace and defense, but there are reported concerns about their lobbying practices. Some people worry that their extensive lobbying efforts prioritize big business interests over ethical considerations. Is General Atomics guided by greed and power or are they a morally responsible powerhouse in their industry?
In 1955, General Atomics was created as a division of General Dynamics with the primary goal of exploring civilian uses for atomic energy. Over time, the company has gained global recognition for its expertise in advanced systems such as surveillance aircraft, sensors, electronics, wireless technologies, and lasers. The increasing use of military drones has solidified General Atomics’ position as a top defense contractor.
General Atomics is well-known for creating the Predator, a highly respected unmanned surveillance aircraft used extensively in the ongoing fight against terrorism. Both the military and government view drones as essential tools in achieving success in the war on terror, particularly in countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Drones have played a vital role in collecting intelligence and conducting surveillance operations, including their pivotal contribution to locating Osama Bin Laden. Since their exclusive use for surveillance purposes starting from the late 90s, UAVs have undergone significant advancements.
Following the September 11 attack, the collaboration between the CIA and military resulted in weaponizing drones. The initial drone employed after September 11th was called Predator, offering vital live surveillance capabilities while hovering over targets. Subsequent enhancements enabled Predators to transport missiles and other weapons, thereby allowing General Atomics and their drones to carry out missions without endangering military personnel lives. Drones are a continuously advancing technology with applications extending beyond solely military utilization.
Remote-controlled aircraft equipped with cameras are being utilized for various purposes. They are used in the study of weather systems and ecosystems, as well as by law enforcement agencies and small private companies that have developed mini-aircraft for sale. According to CNN Money (2013), journalists and sports photographers opt for them over costly helicopters, while real estate agents employ them for aerial photos and videos. Moreover, wildlife researchers, search-and-rescue teams, and even the utility industry are exploring their potential benefits. For instance, the utility industry can use them to locate downed power lines after a storm.
The drone industry is thriving and profitability is evident. While drones have revolutionized warfare, concerns over their ethical implications persist. Many worry that the rapidly advancing technology may be abused. Recently, General Atomics faced backlash as protestors gathered outside their offices, expressing opposition to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles for lethal operations abroad.
On early Friday, a group of about 40 protesters organized by Code Pink staged a street demonstration in front of the home of Neal Blue, the chief executive officer of General Atomics, which manufactures the Predator drone (Walker 2013). The company issued a statement expressing pride in its remotely piloted aircraft that protect our troops and support national security.” The statement also recognized the right to demonstrate: “GA is honored that it can contribute in this way while at the same time recognizing the right to demonstrate.” However, General Atomics has faced more than just a group of protesters questioning their ethics.
The discussion surrounding the impact of businesses on Congress is widespread. Companies regularly engage in business lobbying to advocate for legislation that benefits their organization. Based on data from the Center for Responsible Politics, General Atomics allocated over $1.5 million annually for lobbying efforts between 2005 and 2011. Furthermore, a study of nine months’ worth of congressional travel disclosure forms identified General Atomics as the largest corporate sponsor of Congressional trips from January 2000 to June 2005. The company sponsored a total of 86 trips taken by members of Congress, their aides, and families, with an expenditure exceeding $660,000.
General Atomics is an expert in the field of drone development.
General Atomics is not the only company with its own political action committee (PAC) to influence the government. The manufacturers of drones, along with their trade group called the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, also engage in lobbying efforts. Their spending in Washington last year exceeded $100 million. In addition, members of this association, including prominent defense contractors, contributed over $26 million to political campaigns through their respective company PACs. These practices raise questions about whether they are inherent to politics or if they reflect the notion that “he who has the gold rules”. Another perspective argues that it is simply a prudent business strategy.
Businesses in the United States have the freedom to utilize money for influencing government, which is widely accepted in the public policy process (Buchholtz, 2012). Although some may view it as unethical for large corporations, it remains within legal boundaries. Lobbying activities are frequently undertaken by companies, and General Atomics’ lobbying efforts likely contributed to their drones’ success. Through such involvement in lobbying, General Atomics has demonstrated its commitment to corporate social responsibility and earned significant acclaim for their product.
General Atomics, a company that values profitability and maximizing sales, is also dedicated to social responsibility. They have made a positive impact on the local community by providing job opportunities and promoting economic stability. The manufacturing of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has played a significant role in the regional economy, contributing approximately $1.3 billion to San Diego in 2011. Erik Bruvold, President of the National University Institute System for Policy Research, recognizes General Atomics Aeronautical Systems and Northrop Grumman as key drivers of this growth.
According to Jones (2013), San Diego’s defense manufacturing sector in 2011 had UAVs as the largest contributor, supporting a total of 7,135 jobs directly and indirectly in the county. General Atomics actively participates in various education outreach programs focused on promoting energy conservation. These programs include support for fusion energy research and development as well as general science education. The company’s website www.ga-asi.com/ states that General Atomics is committed to developing innovative energy solutions to address global needs by exploring safe and cost-effective alternative technologies.
General Atomics specializes in innovative technology to improve quality. Their focus is on drone technology, which has been essential in military operations. They take pride in their accomplishments and are dedicated to further advancing their technological capabilities.
Overall, I think General Atomics is a responsible and ethical company as evident from their Predator drone’s popularity among regional governments. Although some individuals might have concerns regarding the impact of new technology, General Atomics seems to be highly competent and proficient in addressing these concerns.
There is currently a lack of awareness about the potential and advantages of drones, which hinders their widespread recognition. To address this concern, drone manufacturers such as General Atomics have the opportunity to use their public affairs department to disseminate more information about drones. It is widely anticipated that by 2015, drones will become a common fixture in daily life.
Bibliography
- Buchholtz, A. B. (2012). Business & Society Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management. South-Western Cengage.
- Jones, H. J. (2013, January 10). Drone Business a Big Economic Force Locally. San Diego Tribune, pp. 1-2.
- Levs, J. (2013, February 8). CNN Explains: U.S. Drones. CNN.
- Open Secrets.org (2011). Lobbying and Spending Data: The Center for Responsive Politics.
- Postelnicu, A. (2006, June 5). General Atomics Top Corporate Trip-Giver for Congress. Market Watch.
-
U.S Air Force (2011). Fact Sheet General Atomics Predator: National Museum of the Air Force,
344 & pg1.
-
Anti-drone Protests Hit CEO’s Home
.
walker,M.(2013,April5).walker,M.(2013,April5).walker,M.(2013,April5).
