Homosexuality Research Paper In today

Homosexuality Essay, Research Paper

In today ’ s society, there exists a mixture of issues which tend to raise

statements with people all over. There are a smattering of subjects that ever seem to

intensify these differences between people to the point where 1 who seriously

participates in treatment, argument and statement can direct their choler towards their

feelings on the individual themselves. Some illustrations of such delicate topics are the decease

punishment, abortion, and mercy killing. An issue that has in recent old ages, begun to increase

statements, is the acceptableness of homosexualism in society.

Until late, homosexualism

was considered purely taboo. If an person was homosexual, it was considered a secret

to be kept from all household, friends, and society. However, it seem that society has begun to

accept this lifestyle by leting same sex twosomes. The thought of coming out of the ‘ closet ’

has moved to the caput of homosexual persons when it used to be the exclusion.

Homosexuality is nil to be ashamed of and we should all come to recognize this.

The Government of Canada passed a jurisprudence doing it illegal to know apart

against an single ’ s sexual penchant. With this in head, the authorities would so

necessitate all of society, including spiritual communities, to welcome the matrimonies,

acceptances, and households of homophiles as though they were in no manner different from

heterosexual 1s. It is astonishing that such an authorization be involved in passing the

credence of the normalcy of this group of persons. To reason that the authorities

is taking a corageous act by passing this jurisprudence, it must be shown that homosexualism is

something we have to accept in society.

Many experience that such a life style is acceptable so long as it is kept in the privateness of

one ’ s ain place while others find it as a wickedness wherever it is. Society looks down at the

homophiles who are seen in the streets arm in arm, caressing, and even prosecuting in what

they call “ unsightly fumbling ” . If one was to see a heterosexual twosome making this

unsightly Acts of the Apostless of fondness nil would be thought of it. Often plenty, homophiles

effort to ‘ pick up ’ straight members of their ain sex, doing considerable uneasiness but to some that same edginess comes from person of the opposite sex every bit good. One adult male named John P. Phillips quoted in “ Essence Magazine ”

“ Having to cover with a homosexual on such an undistinguished juncture as purchasing staff of life, can easy do one ’ s skin crawl, if non destroy one ’ s twenty-four hours. This sort of behaviour disgust me. One should non do themselves ill from another ’ s pick in gender. It can non be denied that sing this activity will pique many but we should be able to alter these mentalities on life.

To those wishing to go parents and partners under the jurisprudence they will happen

many troubles along the manner in order to. The statement frequently heard is that

homophiles are deviants, that the kids they raise will be for good damaged if the

homophiles get the kid. Homosexuality in and of itself does non do one an

inherently hapless parent. This seems rather pathetic to some people when you consider the

issue of the homosexual, whom would evidently be thrilled to raise a kid. The kid

would turn up with his personality, life style, and attitude being formed by homophiles

which could look rather different but could really be interpreted by the kid as nil

out of the ordinary. The Child would turn up larning that homosexualism is normal and is

equal to heterosexualism. The kid will be larning a homosexual and heterosexual

environments. “ Learning life through a homosexual ’ s eyes can make little but

cause future confusion for the kid when he or she realizes that people are non ever

raised by same sex twosomes. These facts do non alter when there is a individual parent

state of affairs. Children will be confused when he or she notices other parents moving immensely

different from their own. ” I wholly disagree from this point of position. The Child will be able

to understand every bit shortly as brought into society that a kid could be raised by same sex

parents or antonym. It merely matters how the parent raises the kid.

A negative side to this proposition is that society, being a aggregation of

consecutive parents raising kids, would set the kid in a unsafe enviroment where

equals would hassle him for his manner of life. It may look to some rather barbarous to let

kids to see such a distressing state of affairs merely to pacify the wants of

homophiles. If we merely seriously look at the state of affairs we can see that it can really be a

valuble larning experience for the kid. If the kid can be put in a proper enviroment.

One with a safe acquisition and life milieus. We wouldn ’ Ts have to be worried of such

torture for a kid if more people would come to recognize that homosexualism can be and

should be accepted in today ’ s universe.

Marriages are brotherhoods of two people under God and the thought is that the two

persons will get down a household and prosper. The point lost in this statement is that at any

clip in the matrimony, wellness permitting, the heterosexual twosome could hold kids. If the

homosexual twosome wanted kids, they would be out of fortune unless they were able

procure some sort of acceptance. Marriage is non merely concerned with the ability to do a

household but to unify 2 loving persons as one. The common statement against any moral

visual aspect is that homosexual inclinations are something certain persons are born with.

It may non be that they are born with it but it is something they aquire to experience at a early age

and there for they are non able to alter what they have come to accept. Over the old ages

at that place have been several consecutive persons who have become homosexual. They have

ever felt this sense of homosexualism but have non been able to acknowledge it to themselves.

One may be afraid of what society will believe of them and how it will impact their every twenty-four hours

Life.

“ And you must non lie down with a male the same as you lie down with a

adult female. It is a abhorrent thing ” ( Leviticus 18:22 ) . The Bible itself, normally know as

God ’ s Word, tells mankind that homosexualism is incorrect. It seems hard to conceive of a

greater authorization than that of God. It seems clear that our ain Godhead scowls to a great extent

upon homosexualism. This is difficult for some to understand that God condemns homophiles

when it may non even be their pick to be homosexual or non. Even though God does non

license homosexualism does this mean we should handle them as castaway, deviants, or

felons? WE shouldn ’ t label these people, justice them, or reprobate them for that affair.

We should handle them as peers an as one of us because even if we are non homophiles

we still do wickednesss.

( 1 Cor 6:9-10 ) “ Do you non cognize that the wicked will non inherit the land of God. Make non be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolators nor fornicators nor male cocottes nor homosexual wrongdoers 1nor stealers nor the greedy nor rummies nor defamers nor defrauders will inherit the land of God ” This was addressed to the local church in Corinth. Corinth was filled with many heathen temples dedicated to the many Gods and goddesses of the clip. It is said that the major temple had over 10,000 priest-prostitutes. This transition is non turn toing Christians instead it is turn toing disbelievers. Regardless of what one does or does non make if they reject Jesus Christ they will non come in the land of Eden. Passages like these are unjust to homosexual people. They suggest that all homophiles are heathen worshippers and do nil but immorality which is wholly wrong.

“ For this is the message you have heard from the beginning, That we

should love one another. ” ( 1 John 3: 11 ) “ We know that we have passed from decease to

life because we love one another. Who of all time does non love abides to decease. All who hate a

brother or sister are liquidators, and you know that liquidators do non hold ageless life

staying in them. ” ( 1 John 3: 14-15 ) All Christians know that to love one another is one

of the most of import Torahs the Lord gave them. To follow this jurisprudence 1 must accept the

fact that homophiles are homophiles. They must love them for who they are and non

effort to alter them. If a Christian feels the nee to “ aid ” homophiles they should

back up them and do them a strong, unfastened minded single. They could besides stand tall

following to them giving the strength to stand up to the bias in society.

It is pathetic that some people have to take this bias to a higher

degree. Violence. “ A recent extended survey by the National Gay Task Force found that

over 90 per centum of Gays and Lesbians have been victimized in some signifier of the footing of

their sexual orientation. ” ( Morality in Practice ) This statistic is crazily absurd. More

so one in five work forces and about one in 10 sapphic adult females have been punched, hit, or

kicked, a one-fourth of all homosexuals had had objects thrown at them, a 3rd had been chased, a

3rd had been sexually harassed, and over 14 % had been spit on for their sexual

orientation. Peoples should non take their choler and hatred to that extreme. There is even a

specific violent act called queerbashing. In this act groups of immature work forces aim a

homosexual and beat him unconscious or until decease. During this whipping they yell out

opprobrious linguistic communication towards the victim. This sort of force and hatred can be compared to

serious racism in the yesteryear.

Some believe that homosexualism is something that transcends the statute law

procedure in that God and that no authorities ’ s proverbial mensurating stick of what is right

and incorrect can perchance compare to that of our Godhead. It is true that no jurisprudence can overrule

the jurisprudence of God but it is non for us to take who will travel to hell and who will hold ageless

life. That is for the Lord to take. He will take who will be condemned and who will

walk with him. To reason, it can be said that homosexualism is an issue unlike most

others confronting society, when the emotions it stirs are considered. The authorities is merely

assisting our society by making these Torahs. If these Torahs exist so people will turn usage to

them and perchance bias would diminish. Peoples should non hold the right to pique

others in public, raise kids in a manner detrimental to the kid ’ s mental wellness, behave

in an unnatural mode that offends the moral codifications of society and that of God. This I all

agree with but to what degree do we cognize that homophiles fit into all this? We have no

right to judge. We should go forth that to the Lord and he will do the right determination. He

will make up one’s mind what the evildoer does and doesn ’ t merit.

Christians know what to stay by. They may cognize that being a

homosexual is traveling against Gods word but they besides know that the Lord says that one

should love all no affair what fortunes. Naming homophiles violative names is merely

every bit violative as from public shows of fondness from homophiles. Of class I for one bash

non fin any sort of this public show offense but some might. So if some want the

regard to acquire homophiles to maintain their announcement of loving one another private so

they have to halt the name naming and force. Homosexuals are merely as human or

Christian as anyone may be so that is more of a ground to love them. The Bible says that

evildoers will be forgiven so for us to be more God like shouldn ’ t we forgive homophiles?