How can we measure conservatism in Financial accounting

Table of Content

As an accounting pupil it is of import to cognize how the accounting truly works. It is non merely about Numberss but it is besides approximately seeking to understand the implicit in theories and how it all helped to specify accounting as now we know it. Understanding the theories will besides do you understand the accounting methods used presents and can give you some thoughts to do future research or suggestions in the accounting field. For our Financial accounting 2 class we were given the undermentioned subject: Accounting conservativism.

Our research inquiry is:

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

“ How can we mensurate conservativism in Financial accounting? ”

This paper will indicate out some cardinal issues, the current province and a critical reappraisal sing accounting conservativism literature that we used. Our paper will be based on, among others, Ross L. Watts ‘[ 1 ]paper about conservativism in accounting and accounting conservativism and the efficiency of debt Contracts written by Frank Giggler, Chandra Canodia, Haresh Sapra and Ragu Venugopalan.[ 2 ]

Accounting Conservatism


Ross L. Watts ( 2002, p.3 ) defines accounting conservativism “ as the differential verifiability required for acknowledgment of net incomes versus losingss. In its utmost signifier the definition incorporates the traditional conservativism proverb: “ anticipate no net income, but anticipate all losingss. ” ”[ 3 ]

Paton and Littleton suggest that ( 1940, p. 128 ) : “ aˆ¦it may good be noted that conservativism in saying the assets. . . is non a rule to steer computations of net income, but a regulation of cautiousness in construing the consequences of accounting measurings made harmonizing to a coherent organic structure of philosophy. ”

So accounting conservativism means that we book costs when they are incurred and net incomes when the company receives the payments. We can in some grade compare it with the fiting rule of accounting. Companies will utilize this method when the benefits of utilizing this method or higher than the costs. We will turn to this farther in the paper.

Current province of conservativism in accounting

Conservatism and debt holders

When companies approach Bankss to borrow money, Bankss are likely to look into if these companies have adequate net assets to cover their loans. Banks are non interested in the hereafter values of the assets but the present values, because future values are non verifiable or believable.

Gigler ( 2009 ) suggest that “ conservativism consequences in timely loss acknowledgment at the disbursal of timely addition acknowledgment. Given the asymmetric final payment to debt holders, seasonably loss acknowledgment is of much greater importance to them than seasonably gain acknowledgment. Timely loss acknowledgment consequences in earlier misdemeanor of debt contracts. Debt holders can exert their contractual rights more rapidly and can curtail the actions of directors. ”[ 4 ]

So accounting conservativism helps the bank to derive dependable information of the present value of the net assets of these companies. So we can do the premise that accounting conservativism can heighten the efficiency of debt contracts.

Conservative accounting as information for equity investors

Conservative public presentation steps or Numberss can be rather utile for equity investors. When faced with settlement the conservative value of the net assets can be of great importance for the investors.. An of import component of equity rating is the abandonment option. When the

runing value of the house falls below the settlement value of net assets there is an chance for increasing the value of the house by neutralizing the assets and travel out of concern. This is merely the pattern that corporate plunderers do. They buy companies when their operating value is below their cyberspace plus value and sell the net assets to do an arbitrage net income and hence have been accused of taking over houses to make merely that.

Watts ( 2002, p 13 ) stated that ”Even if the forsaking option is non in the money, the orderly settlement value of net assets is relevant. In that state of affairs there is often still a chance the option will be in the money in the hereafter. In that instance the option value affects the current rating of equity. ”[ 5 ]

An income revenue enhancement account for accounting conservativism

Income revenue enhancements have long been tied to reported net incomes and as a consequence have influenced the computation of net incomes. Profitable companies have a inclination to utilize accounting methods to cut down reported net incomes. So most of these companies use the accounting conservativism method that will probably cut down their net income. These lower reported net income leads to a lessening in revenue enhancement payments.

Accounting conservativism and directors.

If someway accounting conservativism can take to an addition in net incomes and directors fillips are linked to the net incomes. The directors are more likely to utilize this method.

This behaviour can make a principal-agent job.

The principal-agent theory

This portion will explicate how conservativism is measured. We will utilize this portion so we can do a critical reappraisal of the literature.

Measuring Conservatism[ 6 ]

So Watts defines three types of steps for accounting conservativism:

Earnings/stock returns relation steps ;

Net plus steps

Earnings/accrual steps.

Watts ‘ research on mensurating accounting conservativism:

Earnings/stock returns relation steps

“ Conservatism is the demand of a higher grade of confirmation for additions than for losingss. Additions are additions in the value of net assets and losingss are decreases in the value of net assets. Differences in the grade of required confirmation can be determined by first detecting existent net plus additions and losingss when they occur and so finding whether there is a difference in the velocity with which those additions and losingss are captured by accounting. Reasonably, Basu ( 1997 ) assumes that positive stock returns in a period by and large reflect net plus additions and negative stock returns reflect net plus losingss. If losingss are capable to a lesser grade of confirmation than additions, Basu argues net incomes will reflect net plus losingss more rapidly than net assets additions. The effect is that stock returns and net incomes will be given to reflect net plus losingss in the same period, but stock returns will reflect net plus additions in earlier periods than net incomes. In peculiar, Basu predicts that negative stock returns are more likely than positive stock returns to be to the full reflected in net incomes of the period in which those returns occur.

Basu illustrates his anticipation with the net incomes effects of a alteration in the estimated utile life of a fixed plus. When the estimated life beads, the plus ‘s value beads and the plus is written down to go forth the estimated depreciation of future old ages unchanged.

All of the loss appears in net incomes of the twelvemonth of the loss. Net incomes of that twelvemonth are lower and the expected net incomes of future old ages are unchanged. However, when the estimated life additions ( the value of the plus additions ) , the addition is non taken. Alternatively, the staying book value of the plus is spread over the increased figure of staying old ages of the plus ‘s life, cut downing depreciation for those future old ages. The consequence is to increase the net incomes of the twelvemonth of the addition and the net incomes of future old ages by a fraction of the addition in plus value. Merely a little fraction of the addition occurs in the net incomes of the twelvemonth of the addition.

To supply estimations of his conservativism step Basu ( 1997 ) regresses one-year net incomes on stock returns of the same twelvemonth. The R2 of this arrested development is predicted to be higher for a sample of houses with negative stock returns than for the sample of houses with positive returns. Likewise the coefficient of stock returns is predicted to be higher for the negative stock return sample. This latter anticipation is illustrated by the full loss looking in net incomes in the twelvemonth of loss in the estimated life illustration while merely a fraction of the addition appears in net incomes. If stock returns measured the addition or loss merely so the coefficient would be one for the negative return sample and 1/n for the positive return sample ( where N is the staying life of the plus )

Consistent with the conservativism anticipations, utilizing US informations, Basu ( 1997 ) finds that both the R2 and estimated coefficient of stock returns in a arrested development of a current period ‘s net incomes on stock returns are higher for samples of negative returns. Using fluctuations on this methodological analysis, the consequence has been replicated in other surveies including, among others, Ball, Kothari and Robin ( 2000 ) , Givoly and Hayn ( 2000 ) , Holthausen and Watts ( 2001 ) and Pope and Walker ( 1999 ) . ”

Net plus steps[ 7 ]

”Valuation theoretical account steps. Conservatism ‘s differential confirmation of additions and losingss causes there to be more unrecognised additions than losingss and so understates net assets. A figure of rating surveies estimate the degree of net plus understatement ( conservativism ) utilizing equity rating theoretical accounts. The rating theoretical accounts are either Feltham- Ohlson rating theoretical accounts or theoretical accounts of the ratio of book value of equity to market value of equity ( book-to-market ratios ) .

The Feltham-Ohlson theoretical accounts ( Feltham and Ohlson, 1995 and 1996 ) include parametric quantities that reflect the grade of understatement of runing assets ( due to the accounting rate of depreciation transcending the economic rate ) . Estimates of those conservativism parametric quantities are generated from appraisal of the rating theoretical account itself and besides from clip series appraisal of the relation between variables that are inputs to the rating theoretical account. The rating theoretical account appraisal parametric quantity is obtained from cross-section arrested developments of value on unnatural net incomes, assets and investing. An illustration from Ahmed, Morton and Schaefer ( 2000 ) is the arrested development of houses ‘ estimated good will on unnatural net incomes, lagged operating assets and contemporary investing in runing assets. The coefficient of lagged runing assets should be positive in the presence of conservativism. The other parametric quantity is obtained from the clip series arrested development of unnatural net incomes on lagged unnatural net incomes and lagged book value of runing assets ( see Myers, 1999 ) . Again, the coefficient of lagged runing assets

should be positive if conservativism exists. To obtain the intuition for these anticipations, note that the more unostentatious the operating assets ( due to extra depreciation ) , the greater the coefficient that will hold to be applied to the lagged operating assets to obtain either estimated good will or unnatural net incomes.

Stober ( 1996 ) , Dechow, Hutton and Sloan ( 1999 ) , Myers ( 1999 ) and Ahmed, Morton and Schaefer ( 2000 ) find that the conservativism parametric quantity estimated from the unnatural net incomes arrested developments tend to be negative, non positive as predicted. The writers attribute this incompatibility to the misspecification of the relation between the variables. The specification of the relation is arbitrary and is non guided by any theory of conservativism or accumulations other than the premise that the depreciation rate is excessively high. As a consequence the specification ignores other known dealingss in the time-series of net incomes. In peculiar, it ignores the negative consecutive correlativity that conservativism generates in net incomes and net incomes alterations because of conservativism ( see below ) or because of accrual appraisal mistakes ( see Ball and Watts, 1972 ) . The estimated conservativism parametric quantity in the rating arrested development is less capable to these effects and is by and large positive as predicted. ”

Book-to-market steps.[ 8 ]

”Beaver and Ryan ( 2000 ) step conservativism utilizing houses ‘ book-to-market ratios. Using pooled clip series and transverse sectional informations they regress book-to-market ratios on single twelvemonth and house silent person variables and on single house stock returns for the current and old five old ages. The estimated coefficient of an single house ‘s silent person captures the relentless part of the difference between the house ‘s book and market values of equity. The lower the coefficient, the more conservative the house ( the more book value is biased downward ) . By building, the average coefficient is zero so the coefficient is a step of comparative conservativism and non aggregative conservativism. The step is used to proxy for the extent to which conservativism varies across houses. ”

Earnings/accrual steps

”Earnings steps. Basu ( 1997 ) and Watts ( 1993, p. 11 ) predict negative net incomes alterations are more likely to change by reversal in the following period than positive net incomes alterations. The ground is that ( by choice ) negative alterations are likely to include more plus write-downs and write-ups of liabilities. Since these decreases in net incomes and net assets anticipate future hard currency flow effects, following period ‘s net incomes will non on norm have such write-downs and will increase. On the other manus, the deductions of positive net incomes alterations are non to the full incorporated into current net incomes bring forthing positive dependance in positive net incomes alterations. This anticipation can be extended to net incomes degrees. Again by choice, negative net incomes are more likely to include plus write-downs and liability write-ups. Given these charges are of a one clip nature, following period ‘s net incomes are less likely to be negative. Positive net incomes will be less likely to hold these reversals. Givoly and Hayn ( 2000 ) point out that this asymmetric consequence on net incomes will bring forth negative lopsidedness in the net incomes distribution.

Evidence that negative net incomes alterations are more likely to change by reversal than positive net incomes alterations already existed in the literature before Basu ( 1997 ) , in peculiar in Brooks and Buckmaster ( 1976 ) and Elgers and Lo ( 1994 ) . Basu besides finds this consequence. He regresses net incomes alterations deflated by beginning-of-period monetary value on lagged deflated net incomes alterations. The estimated incline coefficient for positive net incomes alterations insignificantly different from zero, consistent with positive net incomes alterations being lasting and non change by reversaling. The estimated incline coefficient for negative net incomes alterations is significantly negative ( -.69 ) , but is non significantly different from subtraction one, the value expected if negative net incomes alterations are wholly ephemeral. This consequence is consistent with write-downs due to conservatism doing net incomes alterations. If those write-offs gaining control all expected hereafter losingss on the assets, they would be wholly ephemeral. ”

Accrual steps[ 9 ]

“ Givoly and Hayn ( 2000 ) note that conservativism reduces cumulative reported net incomes over clip. They suggest the mark and magnitude of accrued accumulations over clip are steps of conservativism. In a steady province ( no growing ) with no conservativism, net incomes would meet to hard currency flows and periodic accumulations would meet to zero. “ A consistent predomination of negative accumulations across houses over a long period is, ceteris paribus, an indicant of conservativism, while the rate of accretion of negative accumulations is an indicant of the displacement in the grade of conservativism over clip ” ( Givoly and Hayn, 2000, p. 292 ) . Consistent with conservativism, Givoly and Hayn ( 2000 ) find that the distribution of return on assets ( whether derived from time-series of single houses or the cross-section of firm-years ) is negatively skewed for most of the period they examine ( 1956-1999 ) . Givoly and Hayn besides find that over the period 1965-1998 accumulations ( excepting depreciation ) cumulate to an sum that represents 16 % of cumulative net incomes over the same period. This accretion occurs from 1982-1998, consistent with the timing of a big addition in conservativism observed utilizing the earnings/stock return. “

So this is what Ross L. Watts described in his paper.

In the following subdivision we are traveling to give our decisions, review on above mentioned literature and we will seek to explicate research inquiries on this subject.


After an intensive reappraisal of the available literature we can reply our research inquiry:

“ How can we mensurate conservativism in Financial accounting? ”

In the literature there are three chief steps for conservativism in fiscal accounting. First, the earnings/stock returns relation step. Conservatism is the demand of a higher grade of confirmation for additions than for losingss. Differences in the grade of required confirmation can be determined by look intoing whether there is a difference in the velocity with which those additions and losingss are captured by accounting.

Second, the net plus steps, in peculiar the Feltham-Ohlson theoretical accounts ( Feltham and Ohlson, 1995 and 1996 ) . Feltham and Ohlson ( 1995 ) use their theoretical accounts to exemplify the consequence of conservative accounting on the relation between equity value, accounting book value and future net incomes.

Last, the earnings/accrual steps. Givoly and Hayn ( 2000 ) note that conservativism reduces cumulative reported net incomes over clip. They suggest the mark and magnitude of accrued accumulations over clip are steps of conservativism.

Now we have described the different steps for conservativism in fiscal accounting, we are traveling to discourse possible issues on this topic for farther research. As we mentioned before, conservativism is the demand of a higher grade of confirmation for additions than for losingss. Interesting inquiry for future research could be to which extent the demand of a higher grade of confirmation for additions should be to name it accounting conservativism. Another interesting topic to research is the relation ( or non ) between conservativism and net incomes direction. Other possible inquiries for farther research are:

If conservativism can take to a lessening in revenue enhancements how can this hold an consequence on the economic system?

How can the authorities reference this job and to which extent should the authorities be involved with the accounting methods used in the state?

How should the FASB and IFRS reference this issue if the authorities is traveling to take action?

Cite this page

How can we measure conservatism in Financial accounting. (2016, Nov 15). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront