The Internet is a wonderful place of entertainment and education, but like all places where people conspire, there are some corners that people would prefer children not to explore. World society as a whole attempt to protect children, yet there are n required technological constraints to Internet surfing. In a civilization where people have become demented and twisted, aiming to please themselves with naked pictures, o women and children, it may be necessary to censor this material for the mora advancement of our society as a whole.
The Internet was originally a place for people to freely express their idea worldwide, and it has become one of America’s most useful tools. Scientists use email for quick and convenient communication. They can post their current scientific discoveries on the web and others in the same field can know in minutes. But at the same time, adults who spend the majority of their pathetic lives in their mom’s basements, can post pictures of naked women for all to see. Since the Internet is open t virtually anyone, it is incredibly easy for children to be exposed to this material.
Whether or not this material is damaging to children, or anyone for that matter, can not b determined. The Internet itself is completely amoral, but its what people do with I As a whole, the Internet is incredibly useful and informative. Anything that yo could ever wish to know, can be found somewhere on the net. This surplus o information is useful for students, teachers, doctors, lawyers or basically anyone in a field who wishes to become more informed.
Though it is sometimes quite difficult t find the information you are looking for, primarily because of all the porn that you have to stumble through, it is a consequence that comes with the use of this extraordinary tool. The information is out there, and when the right amount of time is invested, it ca The media is giving a mixed message on censorship of the Internet. It really depends on what you are reading. Most newspapers and magazines take an objective standpoint, but the Internet as a whole seems to oppose it.
Most people don’t want t to censor themselves or the things that they are looking at, and this is certainly understandable. I found a drastic majority of sites on the net opposed to censorship that I did for those who were for it. People seem to enjoy the freedom of speech and they should be able to. “Online systems give people far more genuinely free speech than ever before in human history” (Corn-Reverse 71). This is very true. If the government were to take action to censor the Internet, they would be acting unconstitutionally and would fac hearings in front of the Supreme Court.
This is why they do not take direct action towards complete censorship of the net. It must also be understood that censoring the net is technologically impossible. As described by Allison and Baxter, “Any computer Science graduate can create completely secure encryption system for their own purposes. The material can even b disguised, for example hidden inside a perfect picture” (Allison and Baxter 6). If a person wants to publish offensive material on the Internet, then they will find a way. Th same thing happened during prohibition.
Though alcohol was illegal, it still made it Also, censorship of the Internet would be a complete contradiction. Pornography is legal in videos and magazines, so it would be inconsistent to ban the Internet equivalents. People should be able to restrict the information flow into their homes. They should be able to exclude any subject matter that they do not want their children t see. But sooner or later, those children will be exposed to everything that they have been shielded from, and they will have to deal with these shocking sights with thei uncultivated moral standards. Everyone will sooner or later be exposed to something tha they find offensive, so there is really no reason to attempt avoidance.
These sights will be drastically more horrific for someone who wasn’t exposed to them at an earlier age than someone who was and has learned how to deal with them. The government should maintain their “hands-off” policy on this issue. It should be the parents full and complete responsibility to censor their child’s Internet use. If the parent does not wish to or is unable to supervise their child’s Internet use, there are way to secure censorship.
There are hundreds of programs that can be easily installed that will block most of the offensive material. America Online even has this feature built i and it can be easily turned on to prohibit viewing of certain sites. If the parent wishes t block all offensive material, then the only solution would be to not have Internet accessibility at their homes. These parents should stop being so naive and should le their children freely use the Internet without fear of restriction. The government isn’ going to do anything about it, and neither are Internet providers. Pornography will always be there, and it’s not really that big of an issue. Even if a parent were to restrict Internet use, in a feeble attempt to keep their kids away from porn, they should realize that it is not hard to obtain. If the child wishes to look at pornography, then they will fin it.
That is a harsh reality in our society today. The media frequently addresses the issue of censorship, and I feel that they ar saying the right thing. The majority of the time they are saying, hey, we’re not going t censor ourselves, but feel free to do it yourself. This is what I firmly believe. If someone wishes to post an Internet site that appeals to pedophiles and zoophilia, then so be it. you don’t want to view that site, then don’t go there. These things aren’t disguised. You know when you see the description for a pornography site. It is said that people ar sexually aroused by this type of thing, but that’s just the type of society that we live in. This isn’t going to change, so everyone should learn how to deal with it.