The second part of the essays begins by discussing the concept of a classless society as defined by Karl Marx. This is followed by an assessment as to whether or not a classless society is attainable and sustainable in this century. Class The term class has several different definitions. It can be defined as the segment of a population that have similar social standings in society or a similar social status.
That is, a group of people in society sharing broadly similar types and levels of resources, who possess similar styles of living and, some common perception of their collective condition.
Alternatively, Marxist are not concerned with the ideas of individual workers about their position in society. They hold that a person’s class is not determined by the amount of wealth that he has, but by how he acquires it, as determined by his relation to labor and to the means of production. As defined by Lenin Vladimir 1. “Classes are large groups of people differing from each other by the place they occupy in a historically determined system of social production, by their relation (in most cases fixed and formulated by law) to the means of production, by their role in the social organization of labor, and, consequently, by the dimensions of the share of social wealth of which they expose and their mode of acquiring it” (1965, IPPP).
Class Struggle According to Marxist theory, there once existed a classless society which encompassed tribal society and primitive communism because everyone was poor and carried out the same type of work.
Classes emerged only at a certain stage in the development of productive forces and the division of labor. This occurred when the transition to an agricultural society created the existence of surplus of production, which was more than enough to satisfy an individual’s needs at a particular time. It is this surplus production hat brought about the development of classes in society, because the surplus could be used by the higher class. That is, the ruling class which did not participate in production. Types of Class “There are three great social groups, whose members… Live on wages, profit and ground rent respectively”. Karl Marx: 1971, p. 886). These three social groups or classes are: ; the proletariat or working class, ; the bourgeoisie or capitalist class, ; the landlord class The Landlord Class Marxist-Leninist define the landlord class as that class which owns land and derives its income from ground rent on that land. Marx considered them a marginal class, progressively losing their importance with the development of capitalist society. Thus, in a developed capitalist society, there are still three basic social classes, but these are now the bourgeoisie; the petty bourgeoisie; and the proletariat: “Every capitalist country… S basically divided into three main forces: the bourgeoisie, the petty bourgeoisie and the proletariat” (Vladimir l. Lenin; 1964, p. 202). The Bourgeoisie These are the owners Of capital. It is this capital that they use to buy and exploit labor power and then use the surplus value from employment fifths Barbour power to accumulate or expand their capital. Marxist-Leninist define the bourgeoisie or capitalist class as “… The class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labor”. (Frederica Engel’s: Note to: Karl Marx & Frederica Engel’s: 1943; p. 04). Classlessness The term classlessness can be used to describe several different social situations occurring in society. Amongst these include; I. Societies in which classes have never developed. These being societies in which all people are considered equal, carry out similar economic roles and have never created a vision of labor. Ii. Societies where classes have been deliberately or voluntarily abolished such as is the case for the Israeli kibbutz’s. Class analysis explains how modern capitalist society works and accounts for many of the other issues raised by the other approaches.
But class analysis has been criticized as economically too deterministic and not able to explain changes in modern societies where people from different strata show mobility as they benefit from the dynamic organization of the capitalist economy. Another critique of class analysis is that, because of the focus on he production, it tends to ignore the fact that social stratification in society occurs along various planes and not just economic organization as. Others have identified stratification on the basis of gender, race, ethnicity as key to understanding most societies.
From the above, a classless society can be explained as one where there is no private ownership and control/rights over property. That is, a society where the basis of class division in property has been eliminated through public ownership of the means of production. By implication, all value including surplus value created by labor is consumed electively by the community. In accordance with the above analysis of Marks theory on class and classless society, and the occurrences of this century, it can be concluded that a classless society is not likely to be attained, nor sustained.
This is because time and history have invalidated many of Karl Mar’s assumptions and predictions. For instance, capitalist ownership and control of production have been separated. Joint stock companies forming most of the industrial sector are now almost entirely operated by non-capital- owning managers. There is also the case of people in a society not only being employees of a company, but also owning capital, that is, shares in the company they work for. In such a situation, it is not expected that a revolution against the capitalist can take place as the worker is the capitalist.
It would not be logical for a person to overthrow himself. Workers are divided and subdivided into different skill groups. They have not grown homogeneous. Thus, it is quite difficult for the proletariat to start a revolution as each worker or skill group has different goals and values. That is, workers are not united and not all may be willing to participate in the overthrow of the capitalist. In edition, class stability has been undermined by the development of a large middle class and considerable social mobility.
Instead of increasing extremes of wealth and poverty, there has been a social leveling. And finally, bourgeois political power has progressively weakened with growth in worker oriented legislation and of labor-oriented parties, and with a narrowing of the rights and privileges of capital ownership. Most important, the severest manifestation of conflict between workers and capitalist (the strike) has been institutionalized through collective bargaining legislation and the legalization of strikes. Furthermore, some of Mar’s predictions have not come to pass: Growth of capitalism.
While Marx expected capitalism to expand and he understood the adaptability of capitalism to new conditions, he appears to have expected capitalism to eventually collapse. Today, capitalism has adapted and has created new means of expanding itself – through development of new technologies, new forms of organization, colonialism and imperialism, and new markets. Technology reducing profits. Marx predicted that as industry becomes more mechanisms, using more constant capital and less variable capital, the rate of profit would fall.
Cite this Karl Marx Classless Society
Karl Marx Classless Society. (2018, Apr 07). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/karl-marx-classless-society/