Brent went to Gregg home to tell him that he and Kathleen had been seeing each other and the child she was carrying was his, but that inversion turned into Greg punching him and trying to push him out of the door. Brent pulled out the gun he had brought to the house and shot Greg in the heart. He stayed long enough to hold Greg as he took his last breathe and promised Greg to take care of Kathleen and his unborn child. Brent knew murder was wrong, but he did not care. Greg was out of the way.
It was not the Kathleen that called, but instead was two detectives. Brent agreed to go speak to them. He brought his lawyer and was informed that they found his fingerprints at the scene and was charging him with murder. Although they had Beret’s engineering, the police were never able to find the murder weapon or break the alibi that Brent cleverly set up for himself. Brent was found not guilty of murder. Instead of Kathleen running to him for consoling, she went to the court house and filed a wrongful death suit against Brent.
Although he had already been cleared, Kathleen had every legal right to file the wrongful death suit under civil action. In this scenario, Brent was charged by the district attorney with one count of murder in the first degree. A person is charged with murder in the first degree if the homicide was committed with malice, which is characterized by the murder omitted with a deliberate and premeditated state of mind. The deliberate loss of someone inflicts grief and sadness upon the victim’s family, therefore committing murder is detrimental to societal order.
Due to the extreme effect murder has on society it is considered one of the most serious crimes worthy of the harshest of punishment which can include life without possibility of parole and even death. The criminal action used in this scenario was instituted by the government to punish the offense of homicide. The element of men’s rear was shown in this scenario because Brent intentionally and knowingly caused the death of Greg with malicious afterthought to make Kathleen fall in love with him. Brent wanted Greg out of the way so he went to his best friend’s home with the intent to shoot Greg knowing that this action would result in Gregg death.
The criminal act that Brent committed is the cactus reuse. Therefore because both men’s rear and cactus reuse were shown in this crime, Brent was charged with murder, which is a felony that can result in jail time from anywhere to 25 years to life and even result in the death penalty. The state can bring forth a criminal action case against someone for violating the criminal laws of the state. During the procedure of this criminal action, a person is charged, brought to trial, and then judged on their guilt or innocence (Reuters 2014).
All crimes are considered to be offenses against the state or society and therefore are brought forth as charges by the prosecutor in the court of law. The prosecutor then must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person is guilty in front of either a judge or a jury. The defendant in a criminal action case is entitled to a defense attorney by law and they are afforded certain protections, including the right against illegal search and seizure (Scott 2014). Criminal law regulates social conduct and punishes those that WOUld threaten, harm, or otherwise endanger the health, safety, and moral welfare of civilians in society.
Criminal law differs from civil law because civil laws main objective is dispute resolution and victim compensation whereas criminal laws main objective is to punish those whom break the law. In the scenario, Brent was found not guilty during the criminal proceedings, but was then charged with wrongful death in the civil proceeding. The civil action proceeding is the legal proceeding in which an individual, and not the state, lies a law suit because they have been harmed. The law suit is generally filed in the district court that has jurisdiction over the complaint and the plaintiff seeks equitable resolution (Hostilely 2013).
In the US, civil law makes up the largest number of cases in our legal system. An action in civil court begins when a lawsuit is filed against someone whom is believed to have wronged another individual. These courts are designed to resolve disputes between individuals with whom are believed to have been hurt physically or financially by each other and a legal remedy is pursued (Scott 2014). The burden of proof in a civil action s to prove the case beyond a preponderance of the evidence, which means your case must be believed over the other party’s case.
This burden of proof is a lot less than the burden of proof needed in a criminal case therefore civil cases have been won against defendants that were proven not guilty in the criminal court of law. Just as the case of CO Simpson, Brent was found not guilty in the Alexandria criminal court proceeding but was found liable to Kathleen in the wrongful death lawsuit that Kathleen filed with the Alexandria district court. Kathleen was able to file a wrongful death lawsuit against Brent because he caused the death of her Cubans, Greg.
