We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

Leadership Style Adaptability

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Overview of Leadership theories in Consideration

Situational leading theory ( SLT ) is developed by Hersey and Blanchard ( 1968 ) and is based on the leader ‘s undertaking behavior, relationships and the adulthood or ability of the employees. Task behavior is based on how the leaders define function, how and what to make.Relationships are based on how leaders maintain dealingss with followings by back uping them. Adulthood shows the followings experience, willingness and ability to make the undertaking. Based on this, 4 types of leading manners s1, s2, s3, s4 are identified by Hersey and Blanchard ( 1996 ) .

SLT is utile in understanding the relationship between leading manner, degree of adulthood of follower and importance of leading manner adaptability. Several other research workers worked further to develop the theoretical account for application on assorted platforms.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Leadership Style Adaptability
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Transformational theory is the latest theory which developed in the last two decennaries and is of high relevancy and pattern. The thought was foremost developed by Burns ( 1978 ) through Transformational leading theory. Bass ( 1985 ) further developed the theory.

The Transformational leaders put passion and energy into the work atmosphere. They develop a vision for their followings and the followings try to accomplish the end via the energy from the excitement. Leaderships have to constantly convey or sell the vision to their followings. They will be ever with the followings in charge of the undertaking and have solution to most jobs. Bass ( 1985 ) suggested that transformational leaders try to increase the undertaking consciousness, motivates followings to work for the squad and administration and makes the followings to draw a bead on for demands. He proposed 5 factors or transformational leading factors, Charismatic leading, idealised influence, inspirational motive, Intellectual stimulation and individualised consideration. Based on these factors big figure of research worker has surveies the relevancy of transformational leading in assorted Fieldss and have tried to develop the theoretical account further.

Aim of the reappraisal

The reappraisal tries to associate the assorted surveies that have happened in the current decennary on situational leading and transformational leading. Assorted writers who have studied the relevancy of situational leading theory and Transformational leading theories are considered and their findings are taken into history for the development of the theories. The reappraisal checks the adaptability of both the theories in assorted work environment which helps to happen the countries which require farther surveies on the theoretical accounts.

Situational Leadership Theory

Situational Leadership Theory-Supporting Views

Several surveies by assorted research workers were conducted on the application of the SLT in organizational contexts. ( Arvidsson et al.2007 ) contend that leading manner adaptability vary harmonizing to group and single state of affairss and state of affairss where success and adversity is present for the employees. The writer farther asserts that the leading was relationship oriented and supportive in success and group state of affairss and undertaking oriented in adversity and group state of affairss. This requires variableness of leading manners of the leader harmonizing to the state of affairs, undertaking and ability of the followings. Silverthorne & A ; Wang ( 2001 ) farther supported this determination by asseverating that leading adaptability by directors requires better undertaking behavior and relationships and this increases productiveness. They asserts that this require different leading manners which vary harmonizing to state of affairss. This requires directors to exhibit different leading manners harmonizing to the undertaking and ability of the followings. Arvidsson et Al ( 2007 ) further contend and support this demoing the importance of changing leading manner harmonizing to the ability of the followings. They should be able to steer on the undertaking, and have successful and influencing dealingss with the followings. Equally far as my experience, this position holds in many gross revenues environments where the influencing leading manners give the focal point and motive to the followings. These leaders besides understand the adulthood or ability degree of the followings and back up them in assorted state of affairss and thereby making a strong resonance. My directors are seen to be exhibiting task behavior more towards junior directors whom are new to the occupation. They guide them and state them how to execute the undertaking and thereby make a strong resonance with the followings. All this shows visible radiation to the ability of the leader to accommodate to the state of affairs harmonizing to the assorted demands and motivations of the followings and state of affairs which supports the SLT by Hersey and Blanchard ( 1996 ) . Successful leaders therefore vary their leading manners and ability of the leaders to be adaptative to the environment leads to the success of administration Silverthorne & A ; Wang ( 2001 ) . ( Silverthorne & A ; Wang ( 2001 ) : Arvidsson et Al. ( 2007 ) ) province that leading adaptability and exhibiting of different leading manners depending on undertaking, dealingss and ability of followings are of import and thereby supports the SLT. My personal work experience as a leader supports this determination and thereby supports SLT.I have experienced the importance of undertaking particularization, relationships and the ability of followings to put to death the undertaking as an of import factor for success.

Situational Leadership Theory -Against

There was besides some determination s which goes against the SLT. Papworth et Al ( 2009 ) inquiries the pertinence of SLT of Hersey and Blanchard ( 1996 ) .They contend that their findings and research gave small support to the SLT theoretical account. They argue that the degree of supervisor behavior was independent of the supervisee experience. Support to SLT was merely found when the supervisee is extremely experient and skilled and the supervisor have to make less undertaking behaviors which were supported by Silverthorne & A ; Wang ( 2001 ) . Butler & A ; Rees ( 1991 ) was besides against the SLT theoretical account. They argue that the leading manner adaptability had small dealingss with the public presentation of the employees in a extremely competitory gross revenues environment ( Insurance ) . They asserts that there are more factors that may impact the public presentation and preparedness of the sales representative like followings perceptual experience of managerial manner, the trouble of undertaking involved in the sale procedure and difference in follower preparedness. Silverthorne & A ; Wang ( 2001 ) argues and supports SLT by asseverating that leading manners should change harmonizing to state of affairss and depending on follower preparedness. The determination of Butler & A ; Rees ( 1991 ) are rather relevant because from my ain experience in the Insurance industry over 2 old ages, I do understand that the changing perceptual experience of managerial manner and trouble of the undertaking in manus do hold an impact on the public presentation. Even though the directors vary their manner harmonizing to state of affairss of undertaking and ability, the factors proposed by Butler & A ; Rees ( 1991 ) do lend to the public presentation of employees. I would wish to add that leading adaptability is merely one among many factors that determine public presentation in competitory gross revenues environment. The objectiveness and the birthplace of the determination of Papworth et Al ( 2009 ) are truly questionable based on the type of the research and the country of research they conducted. They used clinical Sessionss and tapes from a really low sample and made all the appraisal about the situational leading theory. The relationships and undertakings In these Sessionss were compared to leading and undertaking of SLT. This causes broad unfavorable judgment and inquiries the relevancy of their determination on SLT. Furthermore Papworth et Al ( 2009 ) gives merely some theoretical grounds alternatively of an existent research consequence.

All this surveies point to the fact that SLT may non be widely accepted in all Fieldss of survey and industries. This besides points that SLT may be suited to certain industries and may non be fitted into some other.There are external and internal factors which are to be considered depending on the type of industry and environment, like undertaking involved and external factors.

Situational Leadership Theory-Alternate Views

Johnson ( 1998 ) proposes an surrogate or modified theoretical account of SLT. The writer combines SLT theoretical account which uses directing and back uping manners of leading. He besides takes phase theory of group development by Tuckman & A ; Jensen ( 1977 ) and the phases of development of the followings by Blanchard ( 1985 ) along with the SLT. This theoretical account varies from SLT by sing “ each of the four leading manners may be appropriate some of the clip, the most loosely applicable manner combines construction and empathy ” Johnson ( 1998 ) .The writer farther asserts that the theoretical account can be applied to persons and merely to the groups which are executing at the same degree. VanderVen ( 1998 ) farther supported this modified situational leading theoretical account. The theoretical account tries to get the better of some of the short falls of SLT. But my direction experience shows that directors do be given to demo situational attack based on the varying degrees of their follower public presentation. It is non likely that in existent universe you will acquire a squad of followings ( groups ) who perform In the same degree.

Discussion of Situational Leadership

The findings of Arvidsson et Al. ( 2007 ) and Silverthorne & A ; Wang ( 2001 ) favoring the SLT was across different civilizations ( Swedish & A ; Taiwanese ) .They besides researched in different industries of Information engineerings and air trade. Butler & A ; Rees, ( 1991 ) and Papworth et Al ( 2009 ) found no support to the leading manner adaptability and SLT in their several surveies. All these findings makes and repeat to the fact that situational leading varies harmonizing to industries and civilizations. This calls for farther surveies on the alteration and application of the SLT across assorted environments. The attempts put frontward by Johnson ( 1998 ) is applaudable and more research work should be done on farther rectifying the restrictions of the SLT theoretical account.One of the key countries which require research is the heterogeneousness of the degrees of subsidiaries and the behavior of leaders consequently.

Transformational Leadership Theory

Transformational Leadership Theory-Favourable factors

Purvanova et Al. ( 2006 ) conducted farther surveies on the impact of Transformational Leadership Theory ( TLT ) on occupation perceptual experience of the employees. Transformational leaders irrespective of the type of different occupations they were involved in exerted a positive influence on the employees perceptual experience of occupations. Employees with transformational directors found their occupation as, meaningful, disputing and animating.The surveies further supported Bass ( 1985 ) positions that transformational leaders inspire followings to see their occupations as of import and seeks them to execute beyond outlooks which they does. Chan & A ; Chan ( 2005 ) asserts that leaders with high use of transformational leading factors have more positive influence of occupation perceptual experience and public presentation. He farther contend and support that, all the transformational leading factors in the Bass ( 1985 ) TLT has direct impact on the leader effectivity, public presentation of employees, their perceptual experience of occupation and its satisfaction. Schyns & A ; Sanders ( 2006 ) contend that solidarity of follower with co-workers and leader is related extremely to Transformational leading manner of the leader. Higher the transformational manner perceptual experience of the employees, better solidarity to the leader and the squad was found. Panagopoulos & A ; Dimitriadis ( 2009 ) contend that a positive TL behavior of directors will do increase the public presentation of the gross revenues individual, high satisfaction due to their supervisor and creates or increases committedness to the administration. This was predicted in a behavior based control gross revenues environment instead than an result based gross revenues environment.

The plants by these writers are related and focuses on the impact of TL manners on the followings and their behavior in work.These works support that a high TL manner certainly increases the behavior, focal point, occupation satisfaction, and public presentation and committedness degrees of the followings. Purvanova et Al. ( 2006 ) and Chan & A ; Chan ( 2005 ) argue that exhibition of TL causes higher positive occupation perceptual experience of the employees. . Chen & A ; Baron ( 2006 ) farther supports this by foregrounding the impact of one of the TL manner which causes higher occupation perceptual experience to the followings. I personally have experienced transformational leading manners ( factors ) from my director during my work as a junior gross revenues director. This caused an addition in motive and committedness towards the administration and director ensuing in high public presentation and accomplishments. ( Purvanova et al. ( 2006 ) ; Panagopoulos, & A ; Dimitriadis ( 2009 ) ) .

All these findings ( Purvanova et al. ( 2006 ) ; Chan & A ; Chan ( 2005 ) ; Panagopoulos & A ; Dimitriadis ( 2009 ) ) shows that transformational leading manners of leaders do hold an impact on the employees perceptual experiences of their ain occupations. TL manner increases the reactivity, satisfaction, public presentation, inspiration, significance and a vision for the follower ‘s occupations. TL motivates followings to execute beyond outlook of the employer and thereby making more successful individuals and administrations. Further TL creates a committedness and focal point in the followings for the occupation and leader. TL generates a feel for squad work and solidarity to co-workers among the followings. Therefore TL as a whole aid in making a focused and motivated atmosphere were people work enthusiastically. My position is that, the application of TL in an administration will take to a motivated and successful administration subjected to other factors. These calls for the ability of directors and leaders to accommodate learn and implement TL manner for a better and successful work environment.

Transformational Leadership Theory – Limited favourability.

Although the bulk of surveies showed support to the TLT theoretical account, there were some findings that offered limited support to the theoretical account and questioned the catholicity of the TLT theoretical account. Mannheim & A ; Halamish ( 2008 ) tested the TL theoretical account in the context of ground forces preparation cantonments. They conclude that the merely in the novices learning civilization the TL manner is related to group consequence. The writers found small support for the leading manners, group result and coherence in other higher degrees. This lead to the moderateness of TLT in assorted contexts and besides this may be due to many other factors which require farther research. Barnett et Al. ( 2001 ) supported this position by proposing that the TL behavior have a negative association with pupil larning civilization. Kelloway et Al. ( 2000 ) argued that leading preparation and feedback together will hold small consequence on the TL manner perceptual experience, where in the average clip both separately can hold an impact on the TL perceptual experience. Chen & A ; Baron ( 2006 ) echo a similar but somewhat variant position. They argue that the leaders do be given to demo high transformational leading accomplishments. But merely the idealized influence manner of TL increases the occupation satisfaction of the followings and if the leader Don show this facet of TL manner, the degree of satisfaction may be low. These findings do inquiries the variableness of TL manners and the impact of each manner over different state of affairss, work environment and civilizations. The findings of Mannheim & A ; Halamish ( 2008 ) and Barnett et Al. ( 2001 ) inquiries the use of TL manner in the acquisition and preparation civilization. Both of them conducted their surveies in an environment where preparation has an of import function to play.

The statements of Mannheim & A ; Halamish ( 2008 ) and Barnett et Al. ( 2001 ) clearly indicates that the TLT pertinence in the acquisition and preparation civilization is questionable as they found small grounds in favor of that in higher experient degrees. My personal experience supports this determination as experient followings find it hard to accommodate to TL theoretical account due to their exposure to other manners of leadings, whereas novice can be trained and moulded to the desired signifier ab initio as they are fresh in head. Chen & A ; Baron ( 2006 ) asserts that merely one type of TL manner have an impact over occupation satisfaction of followings. All these positions calls for farther research for the application of TLT in these countries and the factors which causes this consequence on TL should be found and due consideration must be given for this.

Transformational Leadership Theory -Alternative positions

Mitchell & A ; Boyle ( 2009 ) developed a theoretical account based on TL “ for extenuating against destructive emotional barriers to group effectivity ” Mitchell & A ; Boyle ( 2009 ) .Their theoretical account was based on TL impact on cognition creative activity in diverse groups and how TL will assist in making this. The theoretical account tries to explicate the fluctuation of diverse squad public presentations through the impact TL has on cognition creative activity. Dunn ( 2007 ) developed a modified leading theoretical account which was different from the TL theoretical account. They found a difference in leading manner alterations harmonizing to the gender of the leaders. Author argues that this moderated theoretical account will be advantageous to the administration. Both Mitchell & A ; Boyle ( 2009 ) and Dunn ( 2007 ) tried to develop a theoretical account in order to accommodate TL to the varying environments and to develop the theoretical account to a new degree.

Discussion of Transformational Leadership

To reason, Most of the research workers do found favorable factors for TL even though there are limited support findings for the TL. Purvanova et Al. ( 2006 ) , Chan & A ; Chan ( 2005 ) , Schyns & A ; Sanders ( 2006 ) and Panagopoulos & A ; Dimitriadis ( 2009 ) underline the fact that TL increases occupation perceptual experience, satisfaction and public presentation among employees. Mannheim & A ; Halamish ( 2008 ) and Barnett et Al. ( 2001 ) contend that TL have impact on larning civilization in novices level merely and TL do n’t hold much impact in higher experience employee learning civilization. Chen & A ; Baron ( 2006 ) highlights the impact of one TL manner higher than other manners. Mitchell & A ; Boyle ( 2009 ) developed TLT further for pertinence for diverse squad public presentation. TL has found to hold a high impact on the occupation perceptual experience of employee and their pertinence in the acquisition and preparation civilization requires farther research. Besides the impact of TL on civilizations and squad diverseness requires farther research.


Arvidsson et Al. ( 2007 ) and Silverthorne & A ; Wang ( 2001 ) studied and supported the SLT. Their surveies in these Fieldss are commentable and is of high relevancy. They together assert the demand for adaptability of leading and fluctuation of leading manner. I would besides wish to see up on Butler & A ; Rees ( 1991 ) who drew on the leading adaptability of competitory environment. There are many factors apart from leading adaptability and manners which need consideration in such an environment. Johnson ( 1998 ) tried to analyze in the facet of groups and the thought of SLT requires farther research and surveies on factors from external environment which consequence the followings and environment. Purvanova et Al. ( 2006 ) , Chan & A ; Chan ( 2005 ) and Panagopoulos & A ; Dimitriadis ( 2009 ) happening on TL supported and is of high significance in the industry. They show the consequence of TL on occupation perceptual experiences of followings. It besides shows the significance of TL manner in organisations. Their determination shows the relevancy of TL in the concern universe. Mannheim & A ; Halamish ( 2008 ) and Barnett et Al. ( 2001 inquiry the adaptability of TL in developing civilization of extremely experienced employees taking to restrictions in pertinence of TLT in all work environments. Mitchell & A ; Boyle ( 2009 ) modified the TL theoretical account and tried to analyze and implement the impact of TL on cognition creative activity and thereby impacting the diverseness in squad public presentation. Further research is recommended on TLT for application on larning civilizations and its discrepancy over civilizations. All the above surveies are of high relevancy to the leading surveies and helps in the development of situational and transformational leading theories. In general situational and transformational leading manners have high impact on the employees and work environment and requires farther surveies for application in assorted work environments.


  • Arvidsson, M. , Johansson, C.R. , Ek, A. and Akselsson, R. ( 2007 ) ‘SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ‘ , Journal of Air Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 1.
  • Barnett, K. , McCormick, J. , and Conners, R. ( 2001 ) ‘ Transformational leading in schools Panacea, placebo or job? ‘ , Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2001, pp. 24-46.
  • Butler, J. K. and Reese, R.M. ( 1991 ) ‘Leadership Style and gross revenues public presentation: A trial of Situational leading theoretical account ‘ , Journal of persona cubic decimeter merchandising and gross revenues direction, Volume XI, Number 3,
  • Chan, A.T. S. and Chan, E. H. W. ( 2005 ) ‘Impact of Perceived Leadership Styles on Work Outcomes: Case of Building Professionals ‘ , Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 4, pp 413-422
  • Chen, H. And Baron, M. ( 2006 ) ‘Nursing Directors ‘ Leadership Styles and Faculty Members ‘ Job Satisfaction in Taiwan ‘ , Journal of Nursing Education, Vol. 45, No. 10, 404-411
  • Dunn, M. ( 2007 ) ‘British army leading: is it gendered? ‘ , Women in Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 468-481.
  • Johnson, M.M ( 1998 ) ‘Applying a Modified Situational Leadership Model to Residential Group Care Settings ‘ , Child & A ; Youth Care Forum, 27 ( 6 ) .
  • Kelloway, E.K. , Barling, J. and Helleur, J. ( 2000 ) ‘Enhancing Transformational leading: the functions of preparation and feedback ‘ . Leadership and organizational Development Journal, 21/3, pp 145-149.
  • Mannheim, B. and Halamish, H. ( 2008 ) ‘Transformational leading as related to team results and contextual moderateness ‘ , Leadership & A ; Organization Development Journal, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 617-630
  • Mitchell, R. J. and Boyle, B ( 2009 ) ‘A theoretical theoretical account of transformational leading ‘s function in diverse squads ‘ , Leadership & A ; Organization Development Journal, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 455-474
  • Papworth, M.A. , Milne, D. and Boak, G. ( 2009 ) ‘An explorative content analysis of situational leading ‘ . Journal of Management Development, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 593-606
  • Purvanova, R.K. , Bono, J, E. , and Dzieweczynski.J ( 2006 ) ‘Transformational Leadership, Job Characteristics, and Organizational Citizenship Performance ‘ , Human Performance, 19 ( 1 ) , 1-22.
  • Drum sanders, K and Schyns, B ( 2006 ) ‘ Leadership and solidarity behaviour Consensus in perceptual experience of employees within squads ‘ , Personnel Review, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 538-556
  • Silverthorne, C. and Wang, T. ( 2001 ) ‘Situational Leadership Style as a Predictor of Success and Productivity among Taiwanese Business Organizations ‘ , The Journal of Psychology, pp 399-412
  • VanderVen, K. ( 1998 ) ‘Modelling and Modified Situational Leadership: Some Remarks on Johnson ‘ , Child & A ; Youth Care Forum, 27 ( 6 )
  • London Metropolitan University, MBAPage 5

Cite this Leadership Style Adaptability

Leadership Style Adaptability. (2017, Jul 15). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/leadership-style-adaptability-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page