We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Pinchot’s Name as a Possible Presidential Candidate

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Thoughout much of his life in politics, Pinchot’s name had been occasionally thrown around as a possible Presidential candidate. It never happened. He was eventually elected to public office as Governor of Pennsylvania in 1922, largely through the support of rural counties and the new women’s vote. During his 1923-1927 administration, his major goals were the regulation of electric power companies and the enforcement of Prohibition. In a crusade for “clean politics,” he reorganized state government, did away with many longstanding political practices, eliminated the state’s $30,000,000 deficit, settled the anthracite coal strike of 1923 and was known for Because Pennsylvania governors were then prohibited from successive terms, Pinchot ran again forthe Senate and lost.

But in 1931, he began his second term as Pennsylvania’s governor during the depression years. He advocated Federal economic relief for states and donated a quarter of his own gross salary for one year. He successfully pressed for large reductions in utility rates and built twenty thousand miles of paved rural roads to “get the farmer out of the mud”.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Pinchot’s Name as a Possible Presidential Candidate
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

When Pinchot left office in 1935, he was seventy years old. He made a third run for the Senate and later again for the governorship. Both campaigns stalled in the primaries. During his last decade, he fought the transfer of the Forest Service from the Department of Agriculture to the Department of the Interior, an agency he insisted was still corrupt. He assisted his wife in her political career and a third unsuccessful bid for a Congressional seat. During World War II,he developed for the Navy a special fishing kit to help sailors adrift in lifeboats survive. The military commended him for saving countless lives. Shortly before his death, he completed a ten-year effort to write an autobiographical account ofhis work between 1889 and 1910 and his part in the development of forestry and conservation inthe United States. Breaking New Ground, the title excerpted from a Roosevelt accolade, was published posthumously in 1947. Other writings that Pinchot had authored included The Fightfor Conservation, a dozen monographs on forestry subjects, a popular book on his journey to the South Seas, and approximately 150 published articles, reports, bulletins, lectures and On October 4,1946, at the age of eighty-one, Gifford Pinchot died in New York City of leukemia.

After Pinchot left the Forest Service, his interest turned to holding public office. Many conservationists regretted it. With his talents diverted, they claimed, the progress of the movement declined. He was criticized for political opportunism and the relegation of forestry A Republican, Pinchot ran for the United States Senate in 1914 and lost–soundly. In the wordsof Pinchot’s new wife, Cornelia, the powerful incumbent, Boise Penrose “mopped up the floor But when Penrose died in 1921, the old political machinery in Pennsylvania hiccupped. Pinchot ran for governor. Among his supporters were numerous labor unions, farmers and a number of progressives. Perhaps his strongest backers were various women’s organizations. Pinchot insistedit was due to Cornelia and the women she organized that contributed most to his success. An underdog, he won the primary by just 9,000 votes. Soon after, in 1922, he was elected. Pinchot viewed his two terms in the governorship as the most interesting and challenging yearsof his life. He is still considered to have been one of Pennsylvania’s best and most progressive governors. Because he took a strong stand against the old guard of the Republican party, the people respected and trusted him. His accomplishments in fiscal management, reorganization of the state bureaucracy, and regulation of power companies all earned him esteem. Labor relations and public relief were core to his administrations both at the state and national When he died in 1946, Pennsylvania’s government offices closed in special tribute on the dayPinchot was first elected Governor in 1922. In typical fashion, he jumped right in, oftenworking sixteen hour days. He was “always stepping,” said a member of his staff who had worked with several governors, “and it keeps us stepping too.” Brimming with new ideas, Pinchot beganan open door policy, moving into the huge reception room outside his office two hours a day,three days a week. Anyone could get in line and talk to him. It worked. “I am seeing at least three times as many people as I could the other way,” he said. Pennsylvania’s fiscal matters were in disarray when Pinchot took over. Only a week after hiselection, he presented the first budget in the state’s history. His desire to hold down spending quieted those who feared he was a “radical” or a “socialist”. He also pushed through legislation to reorganize the government, to give it a more business-like look and standardizestate salaries. Within two years, the state’s thirty million dollar deficit had been wiped out. In true progressive style, he tried harder than anyone else to enforce prohibition. Most of the “wets”, in his opinion, sided with big business, supported child labor as well as the general abuse of the people, and struck a blow to the common good. He had some success. By 1923, liquor still flowed, but not so freely. His optimism showed in a letter to a friend: “The booze hounds will die out pretty soon and the liquor question will pretty much disappear In 1926, while still Governor, he again ran for the United States Senate. In his heart, hewas “constantly more interested in National work than in State work.” Indeed, at varioustimes, his name had been mentioned as a possible Presidential candidate. But it was not tobe. During the senatorial primary, Pinchot did well in the rural areas but poorly in citieslike Philadelphia where the Republican machine had firm control. Again he lost. Then came the anthracite coal strike. After it became apparent the President of the United States would do nothing, Pinchot took the matter into his own hands. He asked for both sides to meet with him in Harrisburg. Placing each in separate rooms, Pinchot acted as a roving mediator, promising that anything said to him would be held in strict confidence. He never broke his word. Basically siding with the underdog coal miners, Pinchot settled the strike. But the operators merely passed the wage increases on to the consuming public, who were not pleased. This confirmed Pinchot’s opinion of the anthracite managers as “hard-boiled monopolists whose sole interest in the people is what can be got out of them.” Pennsylvania law at that time disallowed consecutive terms for Governor. Just prior to stepping down and with his flair for the dramatic, Pinchot addressed the General Assembly with a stingingspeech. “I am going out of office with the most hearty contempt not only for the morals and intentions, but also for the minds of the gang politicians of Pennsylvania.” He named namesand singled out the Mellon machine in Pittsburg as typical of city organizations spreading “their black hawk-like shadows over the community.” He blasted “respectable elements” for collaborating with “organized crime” to support such machines. In prior administrations, hesaid, the state was run by big money, and the “people got little more than the crumbs thatfell from the rich man’s table.” But Pinchot had resisted, he claimed, and in a stirring conclusion, he called for all to rally behind the “liberal movement to which Roosevelt gaveThe applause, nevertheless, did not knock him from the podium. He later told his sister he “really had a great time writing it, and even more fun delivering it. You ought to have seenthe opposition squirm!” He wrote to John L. Lewis, the leader of the mine workers’ union,that he “greatly enjoyed rubbing it into the gangsters in the Legislature.” Pinchot was proud of his record. The majority of Pennsylvanians agreed with him. So did the Philadelphia Inquirer: “The Pinchot administration has accomplished much,” it said. And on the floor of the United States Senate, Pat Harrison of Mississippi praised him for his”integrity, honesty, and high purpose.” Pinchot was elected Governor again in 1930. Four things were on his mind–control of the public utilities, the state economy, improving rural roads and the 1932 presidential election. Over the next four years he battled relentlessly and with some success for regulation of public utilities. This was also the time of the Great Depression, and Pennsylvania was hithard. Nowhere did a governor, or anyone else for that matter, fight more tirelessly forunemployment relief than did Gifford Pinchot. With a flurry of innovation, he set up work camps throughout the state, which later became models for Roosevelt’s Civilian ConservationHis second term, like the first, boiled over with lively battles. He was often at odds with both parties, loving every minute of it. Always on the lookout for the best personfor the job, he appointed two women to his cabinet. During another coal strike, he attackedthe “swine of the Steel Trust” as he called them, and threatened to take control of the mines. Meanwhile, he became upset with a report from the Society of American Foresters, anorganization he had basically founded. He called the organization “wishy washy” as the nation’s forests continued to shrink through fire, erosion and massive neglect. Collaboratingwith Bob Marshall, the father of modern day wilderness, Pinchot wrote a letter chastising theforestry profession for its policy failures and “spiritual decay”. Bibliography:

Cite this Pinchot’s Name as a Possible Presidential Candidate

Pinchot’s Name as a Possible Presidential Candidate. (2019, May 08). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/pinchots-name-as-a-possible-presidential-candidate/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page