Plato once said, “We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.” Philosophers have been studying knowledge for as long as philosophy has existed. Our perception of the world is limited, and in order to truly understand it, we must maintain an open mind. The study of knowledge, which is known as epistemology, has been an ongoing topic in philosophy since before Plato’s time. The term itself comes from the Greek words “episteme”, which means knowledge, and “logos”, which means word or reason.
Epistemology is the field that investigates knowledge, analyzing its elements, the scope of our comprehension, and even challenging the feasibility of knowing anything. People have restricted perspectives on the world and need to adopt an open attitude to acquire more profound and wiser understandings. Plato becomes disheartened by both the “mob” and the “elite”. The jury in Socrates’ trial exemplifies the irrational and perilous conduct of the mob, easily influenced by manipulative emotional appeals rather than logical reasoning.
Plato contended that the majority of individuals do not possess the necessary skills and knowledge to make significant decisions for a fair society. He believed that most people lack wisdom and self-restraint, frequently opting for emotional choices driven by desires rather than rational decisions grounded in an objective comprehension of what is genuinely advantageous for both themselves and society as a whole. Plato’s observations of occurrences such as Socrates’ demise, the revolt of the Thirty, and manipulative tactics employed by sophists led him to conclude that a corrupt government ultimately generates corrupt citizens.
Plato’s goal was to develop a theory of knowledge that could challenge the doubts and moral relativism put forth by sophists. He held the belief that through differentiating between personal opinion and true knowledge, it would be feasible to establish an ideal society based on truth and knowledge instead of mere illusions and individual preferences. The concept is exemplified in the allegory of the cave, where prisoners confined to facing forward perceive shadows as their sole reality.
Plato’s narrative brings a valuable progression in comprehending reality and Goodness. It reveals the imperfections in our interpretations, making us realize the flaws in our perception. Plato stresses that education is not about imparting knowledge to empty minds but about awakening individuals to their innate understanding. This concept has had a lasting influence, implying that truth is inherent within us. According to Plato, reality is not perceived through our senses but through intelligible truths found in ideas and figures, distinct from the visible world.
Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” presents the physical world as a “dark place” where humans depend on their senses to perceive objects, which are considered inferior versions of reality. As a result, true knowledge of reality in this realm is unattainable. Plato illustrates the journey from ignorance to enlightenment, enabling individuals to comprehend the authentic essence of truth and discern what is genuinely real.
Despite the pain and distress it may cause, this process ultimately leads to freedom and enlightenment for those who acquire knowledge. True happiness is achieved through gaining an understanding of reality. The philosopher, possessing knowledge, is responsible for descending into the cave and assisting as many individuals as possible in acquiring knowledge, or in other words, discovering the truth. Although this argument does not persuade me, as science involves the pursuit of general truths through observation and systematic experimentation, Plato did not believe that a philosopher should rely on observation or empirical investigation to uncover truth.
Plato posited that true knowledge stems exclusively from abstract thinking, asserting that its core is immutable. For him, what holds true remains constant, and knowledge is inherently ingrained. Although I acknowledge the existence of absolute truths, I hold the belief that we acquire knowledge through experience as well, not solely through innate understanding. Aristotle, Plato’s esteemed disciple, is widely recognized as a highly influential ancient philosopher across various realms of philosophy, especially political theory. Aristotle’s perspective on reality diverges significantly from Plato’s ideas.
Aristotle disagreed with Plato, saying that it is impossible to know how the two Forms interact. If the “real or ideal forms” are eternal, perfect, and unchanging, then how do they relate to the imperfect physical objects or Forms on earth? Plato’s belief in a connection or imitation between the real and imaginary is a mistake, as nobody has proven such a connection exists. Even if a connection is established, it still doesn’t explain all the Forms in the physical world.
Plato does not clarify how the greater Form was controlled, raising the question of how Form can exercise control. Is there energy within the Forms? Aristotle countered that form can only be distinguished from content in thought, not in reality. He cautioned against confusing “intellectual analysis” with “ontological status.” Aristotle accused Plato of precisely this error by attributing actual existence to the Forms. According to Aristotle, form is part of the natural order present in specific things and cannot exist autonomously. How does this critique reinforce Aristotle’s own metaphysics?
Aristotle represents a significant manifestation in the quest for a fulfilling life: striving to obtain unbiased knowledge and utilizing it for the betterment of society. Aristotle stands as an exemplary figure of philosophical naturalism, which asserts that the natural world constitutes reality. The Naturalist’s worldview is characterized by an ordered universe, where all components adhere to consistent and discernible natural laws, enabling comprehensive comprehension. Anything beyond space and time is non-existent.
Philosophical naturalists believe that nature operates with a purpose and in order to comprehend anything, it is crucial to identify its fundamental purpose. They reject the notion of a distinct supernatural realm and contend that humans, though unique, are inseparable from the natural world and adhere to consistent laws and principles. Consequently, a thorough comprehension of nature is imperative for a comprehensive understanding of human behavior. Ethics and social science must be founded on diligently observed and gathered factual information through scientific methods, rather than speculative, ethereal, or rationalistic theories.
Aristotle’s philosophical perspective differed from Descartes’ dualistic viewpoint. Aristotle focused on examining real things and believed in naturalism, which asserts that the natural world is the reality governed by consistent laws. He had various opinions on subjects like nature and ethics, greatly influencing mathematics. According to Aristotle, the laws of nature define our existence and our understanding of life revolves around these boundaries. While he recognized absolute truths or knowledge, he emphasized that most knowledge comes from experience.
In contrast, Descartes proposed Dualism as a perspective that suggests the human body and mind are separate entities with distinct functions. This perspective posits the existence of both a physical world and an immaterial world. Dualism centers around two substances: the mind and matter.
Descartes proposed the concept that existence does not depend on the relationship between two things. He doubted his prior beliefs, as humans often hold incorrect ideas. He acknowledged that many of his convictions are based on his perceptions and recognized their potential to deceive him. He was open to the idea that knowledge might not be universally applicable. Furthermore, he played a key role in promoting the belief that the mind is a non-physical entity separate from the physical brain. Additionally, he connected concepts like self-awareness and self-consciousness with the mind.
Descartes focuses on the separation between mind and body in his philosophy, considering it a crucial aspect of human existence. According to his concept of dualism, the body is a material substance while the mind is an immaterial substance. Despite being part of one person, these two elements exist in separate realms. The body resides in the physical realm with tangible objects, while the mind exists in an intangible world that cannot be perceived or felt.
Descartes supports this perspective with his Conceivability argument and his famous quote “I think therefore I am,” which forms the basis of his theory known as dualism. This theory shows how the mind (thinking substance) interacts with the body (extended substance), creating a genuine human being according to Descartes.
Furthermore, Descartes holds a mechanistic viewpoint suggesting that the body operates independently from the mind. His exploration of what he calls “the thinking thing itself” represents a significant shift in modern philosophy from metaphysics to epistemology. Additionally, Descartes acknowledges the importance of adopting a systematic approach to thinking, which he refers to as method.
Descartes employed methodic doubt in his quest for an absolute certain and undoubtable idea. After discovering this undoubtable truth, he attempted to establish a dependable foundation for knowledge based on the innate idea of God. Both Plato and Descartes view mathematics as the paradigm for all knowledge, as mathematical truths are universally valid, irrespective of time, place, or circumstances. In contrast, inductive knowledge and matters of fact are contingent upon time, place, and circumstances. Consequently, Plato and Descartes dismiss our senses of sight, smell, and touch as unreliable sources of knowledge.
Both Descartes and Plato would agree that true knowledge is a priori, which means it is innate and prior to experience. We can use this innate knowledge to uncover what Plato and Descartes would consider as ‘ultimate’ truths. Knowledge presents numerous challenges throughout the day, beyond the basic survival needs that also involve knowledge. In almost every aspect of life, we encounter issues related to knowledge.
Knowledge questions span a wide range, encompassing both significant and trivial aspects of our lives. These questions include determining true friendships, career choices, time management, political decisions, financial considerations, religious beliefs, hobby-related purchases, resolving conflicts between children, selecting dining options, and choosing leisure reading material. These decisions, made constantly throughout each day, have the power to profoundly influence our own lives and the lives of those in our community.
Through these theories, I have acquired a deeper understanding. It is crucial to avoid claiming omniscience and instead utilize our intellect to broaden our comprehension of the world. We must persist in questioning and enhancing ourselves for the forthcoming days. Knowledge knows no bounds, enabling us to acquire fresh insights each day. It is invaluable for individual development and ought to be passed down to future generations. Knowledge endures perpetually and retains its relevance. While some might contend that particular knowledge has become obsolete after centuries of usage, it nevertheless remains efficacious.
Exploring the world allows us to gain a broader perspective and deepen our understanding. Our senses help us make sense of life, while doubting encourages bravery in further exploration. Acquiring knowledge is beneficial, and we can obtain it from teachers and friends who offer straightforward ways to comprehend our lives and the world.
Work Cited
. “Aristotle .” Internaet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. IEP , 21 2005. Web. 3 Nov 2012.
. “Greek Philosopher Plato.” AllAboutPhilosophy.org. AllAboutPhilosophy.org. Web. 3 Nov 2012 .
“Plato – Greek Philosopher.” Ancient / Classical History. About.com. Web. 3 Nov 2012.
“Plato.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Richard Kraut, 16 2011. Web. 3 Nov 2012.
“Plato.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. IEP, 9 2009. Web. 3 Nov 2012.
Shields, Christopher. “Aristotle.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Christopher Shields, 25 2008. Web. 3 Nov 2012.
