Abstract Predators are animals that engage in killing for their sustenance, a necessity for their survival. Controversies surrounding predation have arisen in certain regions, such as the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone National Park and elsewhere. The dynamics between predators and prey can have both positive and negative effects on various species. The least strong and unhealthy individuals serve as food for these predators, ultimately supporting the survival of the species by ensuring that only the most fit members of the population continue to exist and reproduce. Some prey species possess defense mechanisms intended to deter their predators.
The phrase “Survival of the fittest” effectively explains this type of ecological interaction. Predator-prey relationships are common in various ecosystems and communities. Predators, which rely on consuming other organisms to survive, hunt and kill their prey. Prey, on the other hand, are the organisms that are killed as a food source. This interaction is known as predation and can be described as a +/- relationship. It applies not only to animals hunting each other but also to interactions like bears eating berries or insects feeding on leaves. If predators fail to successfully hunt and consume their prey, they will ultimately die.
Over time, animals have adapted to enhance their hunting and survival skills due to the increased difficulty in catching both predators and prey. This essay will explore the effects of these interactions on various species within different ecosystems. The dynamic relationships between predators and prey are seen as either beneficial or detrimental, where the prey is killed, providing energy and nutrients for the predator. Predators play a vital role in transferring energy throughout the food web, with an increase in predator populations occurring when there is an abundance of prey, resulting in a continuous cycle.
When the prey population decreases, the predators also decrease, resulting in the rebuilding of the cycle. If the primary prey population chosen by predators declines, they adapt by seeking out another species to meet their needs. Once this alternative source is depleted, they are compelled to exit the area. As a result, the primary prey population will recover and eventually, the predators will return. This kind of interaction has both positive and negative effects in ecosystems. Over time, predators and prey have evolved differently.
Throughout their evolution, predators have developed improved hunting abilities.
Predators have evolved to enhance their speed in order to pursue and seize prey, relying on their heightened senses of smell, sight, and hearing to target vulnerable and unhealthy individuals. Similarly, prey animals possess acute olfactory and auditory capabilities that enable them to evade becoming a predator’s meal. Certain species have also developed strategies of camouflage to minimize visibility to predators. For instance, the snowshoe hare possesses white fur which allows it to seamlessly blend into its snowy environment, reducing the likelihood of being consumed by a predator.
Predators have developed different strategies to enhance their hunting abilities, such as improved agility and remarkable endurance. These adaptations allow predators to effectively chase and hunt prey across larger areas for extended periods of time. For example, the cheetah can reach speeds of up to 70 mph, while other predators can achieve speeds of up to 40 mph. It is important to consider that predators can function as both hunters and targets within the food chain (Phillips and Smith, 1996).
In an ecosystem, a spider can be found on a web, consuming an insect for its meal. Close by, a lizard lurks with its tongue ready to strike and devour the spider. Behind the lizard, a roadrunner patiently waits for an opportunity to have a meal. And one hour later, a coyote preys on the roadrunner. This complex network of interactions represents the food web within the ecosystem, and any disturbances to this delicate balance can lead to population decline in specific areas. Predation plays a vital role in maintaining the circle of life as predators benefit not only themselves but other species as well when they successfully make a kill.
Predation is important in the food chain as it provides numerous advantages. When an elk is hunted and killed, it serves as nourishment for various predators such as bears, mountain lions, coyotes, eagles, and others. Smaller creatures like rodents and scavengers like ravens also take advantage of the prey. Humans, who are also predators, understand the need to kill animals for food consumption. Even if we do not directly engage in hunting when we consume meat, any leftover food can still be given to dogs. Bacteria and parasites may also play a part in this process. Anything that we do not consume ourselves can be utilized for composting purposes. Overall, predation contributes to the various benefits that the food chain offers.
The text explores the significance of predation in the food web and its role in population control. Molles highlights that certain species, like snails, can transmit diseases to various species, including humans. In Kenya and other East African countries, crayfish have been utilized as a means of managing snail populations. This approach is also employed in some cases to eradicate problematic or invasive species. Furthermore, the text emphasizes the importance of predator body systems within the context of predation.
Predators, whether they are birds of prey or carnivores, rely on hunting and killing to obtain their food. Predation is the vital interaction between predators and their prey that is essential for all life. Predators hunt and kill in order to get the sustenance necessary for their survival. When looking for food, they skillfully select the most accessible prey, using their evolved abilities as exceptional athletes who are fast, strong, and equipped with specialized bodies, teeth, claws, and talons that are crucial for consuming raw meat and penetrating the skin and bodies of their prey.
Predators possess longer teeth and canines for stabbing and killing prey, as well as carnassials that act as cutting teeth to shear meat. Rather than chewing, they swallow large chunks of meat whole. To effectively kill their prey and access food, predators require a strong jaw, powerful muscles, and heavy skulls. For example, jaguars have incredibly strong teeth capable of biting through turtle shells, while hyenas can bite through bones to reach the marrow inside. Carnivores and predators have relatively simple digestive systems with small stomachs that enable them to consume large amounts of food at once. This allows them to gorge themselves and go without eating for days. Their digestive systems are adapted to efficiently process large quantities of food in a short time frame. Consequently, they extract nutrients from the meat and fat while only excreting fur and bones in their feces. Wolves exemplify this by consuming up to 20 pounds of food in one sitting and spending hours digesting or regurgitating meals for their pups.
In ocean ecosystems, starfish serve as one type of predator.I personally witnessed this in my saltwater aquarium at home where the starfish acted as the dominant predator by consuming all introduced snails (References: Phillips and Smith, 1996;DOW 2009). The sea star uses its tube feet to move towards the snail,latching onto the shell with its mouthand removing the snail.Similarly, sharks are important predators in ocean ecosystems.The Great Barrier Reef is faced with a specific issue: an excessive presence of crown of thorns starfish.
According to the Green Diary, the coral is being destroyed by voracious eaters – starfish. These starfish can devour up to 6 square meters of the reef in a year, causing significant harm. The problem stems from a decline in predator populations such as the hump head wrasse and giant triton, which normally feed on these starfish. Overfishing has resulted in a decrease in these predator numbers.
Birds of prey, such as the bald eagle, vultures, hawks, and the golden eagle, are considered predators. They have the ability to take down both young and adult livestock. These birds primarily rely on scavenging, feeding on large animals that are already dead. Equipped with talons and curved beaks, they tear into their prey and consume it voraciously. Their hunting technique involves swooping down with their talons extended. These birds possess three front talons and one in the back known as the hallux. Upon striking their prey, they firmly grasp it with their talons, which can puncture the lungs of young calves when targeting their shoulders.
After gorging themselves, they will abstain from eating for a few days. They have a slower eating pace compared to other predators and have a tendency to consume one side of the prey, flip it over, and eat the other side. The most formidable among them is the golden eagle. In Alaska, the golden eagle is renowned for preying on Dall sheep lambs and even caribou calves. Occasionally, golden eagles will collaborate in hunting and work together to obtain their food. They also heavily target snowshoe hare and various rodents. Interestingly, these eagles have been observed preying on healthy calves rather than solely focusing on the weak ones.
They primarily target moving animals. Calf deaths typically occur within the first week of life. If a mother spots an eagle approaching, she will attempt to protect her caribou calf by shielding it underneath her body and even attacking the eagle with her front feet. This behavior has been occasionally observed, as eagles struggle to retaliate while swooping down to defend against the calf’s mother. (Woodford, 2004) Certain prey organisms possess defense mechanisms to counter predators. Every organism possesses at least one form of defense mechanism within their bodies.
They possess a variety of defense mechanisms, including poison, sharp quills, chemical defenses, and other adaptations to prevent predation. Their abilities to evade becoming prey are fascinating and astonishing. Certain creatures flee at remarkable speeds, wouldn’t that be your initial instinct? Some engage in combat, while others employ camouflage to blend seamlessly into their surroundings and elude predators. Take chameleons for example, as they can alter their skin colors to match their surroundings and remain unseen.
Some organisms employ deception and possess adaptations that mimic those of unappealing prey to deter predators. Possums utilize the strategy of “playing dead” and can even enter a state of semi-coma to deceive predators and prevent them from experiencing the thrill of capturing their prey. Alternatively, they may foam at the mouth, creating the illusion of sickness or toxicity to avoid being consumed. Certain species have developed sharp quills or other defensive mechanisms, such as the porcupine’s quills that make consumption difficult. Similarly, various ungulate species possess antlers and horns as a means of defense.
Survival in the animal kingdom requires various defense mechanisms. Some creatures employ physical weapons, such as horns or antlers, to impale their opponents. These appendages act as a deterrent, safeguarding the creature’s well-being. Similarly, certain species possess a robust external shell, akin to turtles. This armor acts as a formidable barrier, hindering any attempts to penetrate it. Alternatively, chemical defense mechanisms serve as a means to intimidate potential predators. Take the skunk, for instance, which possesses a potent anal musk that it sprays on its victims. A direct hit to the eyes can even result in blindness. Remarkably, some creatures utilize excrement for self-defense. The potato beetle, for instance, employs its own feces to repel predators. Unpleasant as it may be, this strategy proves effective. Other animals exhibit peculiar defense mechanisms like the horned lizard, which fills its sinus cavities with blood and ejects it from its eyes when threatened. Even the sea cucumber possesses incredible tactics. It has the ability to transform its body from solid to liquid and turn itself inside out, thanks to a toxic substance within its digestive tract that poisons enemies. This adaptable creature can liquefy and seep through crevices before reabsorbing water and returning to its original form. The astonishing methods employed by these creatures truly showcase their determination to survive. Some species rely on their strong feet and tails for defense, exemplified by kangaroos.
There is an ant called the Malaysian ant that can explode when it becomes stressed. When threatened, their bodies rupture, causing them to perish. Surprisingly, they patiently wait for a potential victim to provoke them. On the other hand, the Soldier ant produces toxins, which they release from their abdomen when feeling threatened. The toxins cause their glands to swell and eventually burst, spraying the poison onto their prey. Another case is the hagfish, which secretes a suffocating slime from its pores when it feels endangered. This slimy substance envelops and suffocates its predator.
But sometimes, the hagfish becomes trapped in its own sticky slime and ends up contorting itself in an attempt to escape. (Web Ecoist, 2008) The issue of controlling predation has been the subject of controversy over the years. As early as 1975, Thefethen argued for the eradication of all grey wolves. (Trefethen, 1975) Farmers have experienced losses of livestock to predators when they graze in areas where food is scarce and become vulnerable to attacks from local predators.
Cattle and other livestock have been lost for different reasons. Predation is not a major cause of livestock deaths, as stated by the Defenders. Nevertheless, the USDA offers a program to assist in recovering costs incurred from disease and predation on livestock. The USDA claims that ranchers and producers suffer annual losses of $71 million due to predation. Please refer to the graph below for a comparison between the perspectives of the Defenders of Wildlife and the USDA regarding livestock killings.
According to a study conducted by the USDA in 2000, coyotes are the primary predators of sheep and cause significant harm to livestock. The study revealed that coyotes were responsible for an incredible 65% of all livestock deaths caused by predators in the United States. This emphasizes the necessity for producers and farmers to improve their scare tactics for better protection of their livestock. As a result, they are partnering with Wildlife Services to implement more effective strategies for safeguarding their production.
The National Wildlife Research Center is conducting tests on non-lethal techniques to reduce livestock loss for producers. They have implemented measures like lights and sirens and have installed a “wolf-alarm” in Idaho, where wolf predation is prominent. This alarm, controlled by radio, aims to frighten off the wolves. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, prior to the formation of the National Park Service, the Army was enlisted in Yellowstone and other regions to eliminate all predatory animals, sparking controversy.
Once considered merciless and bloodthirsty creatures, mountain lions and coyotes were perceived as predators that required elimination. Between 1904 and 1908, the Army executed a total of 63 mountain lions and 196 coyotes, disregarding Theodore Roosevelt’s pleas in letters to the military. During the following nine years, Yellowstone witnessed the demise of 23 mountain lions, 1,188 coyotes, and 18 wolves. It was only in 1933 when the National Park Service assumed control that these unnecessary killings finally ceased. Overall, the wolf wars resulted in the loss of 132 wolves.
Following years of advocating for the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone, the park witnessed the introduction of eight wolves in 1995. This move has had a positive effect on the elk population, other species, and vegetation within the region. While beneficial outcomes have resulted from reintroducing these predators, there remains controversy surrounding wolves’ lethal hunting abilities. Worries emerge from hunters and hunting outfitters due to the rapid growth of wolf numbers and their potential impact on elk.
The central concern is the impact of reintroducing wolves on elk numbers. A 2005 report from Montana’s fish, wildlife, and park service reveals a slight increase in the elk population from 2002 to 2005. To regulate wolf numbers, permits allowing shooting have been granted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife bureau, who have also taken direct action by shooting wolves themselves. This response was prompted by worries among farmers and livestock owners due to wolves encroaching on agricultural land and causing harm to livestock.
Observation based estimates suggest that there should be roughly 1.4 to 2.2 elk per wolf every 30 days. Ongoing research by various organizations will determine the future of the Yellowstone wolf population (Preston, 2005). In conclusion, predation is a complex interaction with both positive and negative aspects. While controversial, predator control measures, such as hunting, are implemented in problematic areas, and other strategies are employed to protect livestock from being preyed upon.
As this country and all countries progress, there will always be debates surrounding the subject of taking away space from the living beings that inhabit these ecosystems. This creates a challenge in finding a balance, which remains an ongoing issue. Additionally, as predators ourselves, humans require sustenance just like all other living creatures. Therefore, it is imperative to establish a common ground where coexistence between all beings can be achieved harmoniously (Molles MC. 2000. Ecology: Concepts and Applications, Fourth Edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education. 343-344 p.; Trefethen JB. 1975. An American Crusade for Wildlife).
New York, NY: Winchester Press.409 p.
Hausman L. 1948.Birds Of Prey.New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.165 p.
Phillips MK, Smith DW.1996.The Wolves of Yellowstone.Stillwater, MN: Voyaguar Press.128 p.
Preston, Charles R., curator, Draper Museum of Natural History, Points West article.”Living on the Edge: Wolves and Human Communities in the Greater Yellowstone Area.” Spring 2005 issue.http://www.bbhc.org/pointswest/PWArticle.cfm?ArticleID=179#top Accessed 25 July 2009
The following sources provide information on wolf taxonomy and biology, predation, trophic links including predation and parasitism,
Alaska’s most powerful bird of prey,
and predator starfish causing dramatic damage to the Great Barrier Reefs:
– Defenders of Wildlife.“The basics of Wolf Taxonomy and Biology and Predation.” 2009.Accessed 20 July 2009.[Link](http://www.efenders.org/programs_and_policy/wildlife_conservation/imperiled_species/wolves/wolf_facts/biology.php)
– “Trophic Links: Predation and Parasitism” 2005.Accessed 26 July 2009.[Link](http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange1/current/lectures/predation/predation.html)
– Woodford, Riley.“Alaska’s Most Powerful Bird of Prey.” Alaska Wildlife Conservation News.2004 December.Accessed 26 July 2009.The Green Diary article titled “Predator Starfish Wiping Out The Great Barrier Reefs Dramatically” was published in April 2007. You can read the article by clicking on this [link](http://www.wildlifenews.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=wildlife_news.view_article&articles_id=94&issue_id=21).
Accessed 26 July 2009. http://www.greendiary.com/entry/predator-starfish-wiping-out-the-great-barrier-reefs-corals-dramtically/
USDA. “Wildlife Services Protects Livestock. Assisting Ranchers and Farmers, Preventing Livestock Predation and Wildlife-borne Diseases Developing New Management Methods.” Wildlife Services. FY 2004 report. Accessed 22 July 2006. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ws/introreports/livestock.pdf
“10 of the Most Bizarre Animal Defense Mechanisms” Web Ecoist. Nov 2008. Accessed 29 July 2009.http://webecoist.com/2008/11/04/9-of-the-most-bizarre-animal-defense-mechanisms/
