Get help now

Susan Smith Research Paper Susan SmithIn

  • Pages 7
  • Words 1585
  • Views 623
  • dovnload



  • Pages 7
  • Words 1585
  • Views 623
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    In the wink of an oculus, North America was informed of Susan Smith ’ s

    tragic loss of her two immature male childs. No 1 would hold guessed that such a

    violent offense could hold occurred in a little town. Throughout the ordeal,

    constabularies began to see the defects in Susan Smith ’ s narrative. This lead to intuitions,

    doing the constabulary to do Susan Smith their premier suspect. Dayss subsequently, Susan

    Smith confessed to the horrid offense she committed, go forthing the state in

    disgust. The actions of Susan Smith, which were based on her background and the

    events in inquiry have left a profound societal and legal impact on society ’ s

    positions of violent offenses.

    Susan Smith lived what most would see a normal life up to the clip

    before the event refering the slaying of her two kids. The lone

    exceeding incident in her yesteryear was the self-destruction of her male parent when she was

    eight old ages old. Susan met her hereafter partner David Smith, at the age of nine-

    adolescent. The twosome subsequently went on to hold two kids, Michael and Alex. She

    was described as “ well-known and well-liked ” by her friends, neighbors and

    relations. None of her friends or neighbors could hold expected Susan Smith to

    commit such a atrocious offense.

    The event took topographic point in a little town in Union, South Carolina. On

    October 25th Susan Smith explained that she was “ heading E on Highway 49 when

    she stopped at a ruddy visible radiation at Monarch Mills about 9:15 p.m. , and a adult male jumped

    into the rider seat. ” She described the adult male “ as a black male in his late

    20s to early 30s, have oning a tartan shirt, denims and a toboggan-type hat. ” She

    said that the kidnapper held her at gun point and told her to drive. She drove

    nor’-east of Union for approximately 4 stat mis. Then the adult male all of a sudden told her to halt the

    auto. Mrs. Smith said she asked if she should draw over, but the adult male said for her

    to halt in the center of the route. She claimed that she begged for the release

    of her two kids, who were still strapped in the back place, but it was to no

    help. The town sent out 1000s of voluntaries to seek through “ over five

    hundred square stat mis for the children. ” The narrative subsequently went national but

    there was still no mark of the kids or the aggressor. The town Sheriff, John

    Wells, with the aid of an FBI computing machine system went after every lead that came

    in from psychics, cranks and unthreatening citizens. Even choppers with

    heat seeking devices were used to seek and turn up the kids ’ s organic structures. Both

    Susan and her ex-husband besides faced the cameras in an emotional call for aid.

    Police and prosecuting officers played a major function in bring outing holes in Susan

    Smith ’ s narrative of the abduction. As yearss passed Susan ’ s narrative left excessively many

    unreciprocated inquiries. “ No offenses had been reported in the country that dark so

    why would a fishy be flying? Why would he take the kids if he merely

    needed a auto? If the halt visible radiation Susan stopped at utilizations detectors to observe other

    autos so as to find when to blink a green or ruddy visible radiation, how could she hold

    stopped at a ruddy visible radiation with no other autos around? ” Besides, ” Susan ’ s description

    of the kidnapper was so ordinary that it was useless. ” “ Marc Klass and Jeanne

    Boylen came to Union to assist the constabulary with the probe yet Susan wanted

    nil to make with them. ” The incident had so many holes in it that everyone

    started to acquire leery of the narrative. The constabulary began to inquire about

    Susan ’ s artlessness even though nil of the kind was said in public. The

    constabularies eventually called Susan in for oppugning and searched her place for

    fingerprints. She failed a lie sensor trial and the neighbors began to acquire

    leery stating the constabulary about a adult male she was late seeing. A missive

    from Tom Fidley ( the adult male she was seeing ) was found stating Susan that he wanted

    to be with her, yet he was non ready for a ready made household. “ The force per unit areas

    were all of a sudden more than Susan could manage and she broke down under oppugning

    and confessed after nine days. ” On November 3rd, she told constabularies the location

    of the organic structures. Divers went to John D Long Lake at 4:15pm on Thursday and they

    pulled the auto from the clay. At 6:45pm it was confirmed that two organic structures were

    found in the back place. Mrs. Smith was arrested and charged with two counts of


    The prosecution in the test, Prosecutor Thomas Pope, sought whole-


    edly to convict Susan Smith to the full extent of the jurisprudence in the slaying of

    her two kids. “ At one point during the test he asked for the decease

    penalty. ” On July 22nd, 1995, a jury of nine work forces and three adult females fleetly

    rejected the decease punishment after merely two and a half hours of deliberation.

    They decided that the decease punishment was non appropriate for a “ truly upset

    person. ” When it came to the test her attorney tried to reason she had “ suffered

    plenty for submerging her two immature boies, and that the jury should be lenient. ”

    The petition fell on deaf ears. Susan ’ s confession led to her sentencing to life

    in prison. She will be eligible for word in 30 old ages.

    The actions of Susan Smith will ne’er be forgotten, particularly by those

    who live in Union, South Carolina. The inexcusable misbehaviors of Smith have had

    an tremendous impact on this small town which citizen described as “ ? a God-

    fearing, observant place. ” The whole town of Union bonded together to assist

    support Susan and the constabulary during this hard clip. The citizens hung

    xanthous threads on their doors as a mark of hope that the two small male childs would

    shortly be found. Once Susan admitted to killing her boies the reaction was intense

    and ferocious. Peoples replaced their xanthous threads with black 1s for bereavement,

    bluish 1s for male childs and white 1s for artlessness. Flowers were left near the

    lake by grievers and many felt the demand to keep their kids for a piece

    during this clip. Susan Smith fooled everyone, even her hubby of three old ages

    and her household. Once Susan admitted her guilt, choler and hatred rose in the

    Black Marias of those who believed in her. Thousands everyplace had no thought how

    person could be filled with so much desperation as to step so far over the line of

    right and incorrect and slay her ain two boies. At Susan ’ s bond hearing 100s

    of people showed up to voice their sentiments shouting? slaying! ’ and? babe killing

    bitch ’ Out of choler besides arose ugliness. Some people advocated “ threading her

    up right in the center of the courthouse. ” Many African Americans were besides

    really upset at the fact that Smith labeled the kidnapper as a black adult male. “ The

    actions of Susan Smith will ne’er go forth the Black Marias and heads of the citizens in

    Union who one time trusted her and sympathized with her. ”

    This peculiar instance did non do alterations in the jurisprudence or the legal

    system. What it did make is rouse the people of the United States and Canada to

    the world that immorality and fraudulence lives in our states. Because of this

    incident plans have now been opened throughout the United States and Canada

    to supply support and aid for troubled households.

    The three rules of jurisprudence could be seen in the instance against Susan

    Smith. “ Law as a legal construct ” was illustrated in the instance through the usage of

    the jury to come out with a merely determination refering Susan Smith. “ Law as a

    legal system ” was besides seen in the many bureaus of our society used to continue

    rights. The constabulary and the FBI got to the truth about what truly happened, and

    arrested the individual responsible. Finally “ jurisprudence as a set of regulations ” was shown in

    this instance because the tribunal decided that Susan Smith broke one of the assorted

    regulations set by society and she must be punished for it.

    Susan Smith ’ s actions were based on infinite actions throughout her

    life. Traumatic experiences found in her background necessarily lead to the

    shocking offense. One thing that is certain is that it left a cicatrix on society,

    and had an impact on their societal and legal positions. This research assignment has

    enriched my apprehension of jurisprudence as a legal construct, jurisprudence as a legal system and

    jurisprudence as a set of regulations. It has shown me first manus the usage of these three

    constructs in our universe today.


    Adler, Jerry. “ Sins of the Mother ” Newsweek, 14 November 1994.

    Brooke, Heathe. hypertext transfer protocol: //

    Brurn, Alex. “ Susan Smith Review ” Law and Society Review, 28 November 1994.

    Gibbs, Nancy. “ Death and Deceit ” Time, 14 November 1994.

    Grenm, Roy. The Disgust of a Nation ( New York: HEADLINE Publication 1995 )

    Henderson, Gary, The Susan Smith Trial: Nine Dayss in Union ( South Carolina:

    Herald Publishing 1996 ) , p.193

    Reuter, A.P. “ Abducted childs, ma accused of slaying ” Toronto Star, 9 November

    1994, intelligence sec. , p. C 26

    Schultz, Steven. hypertext transfer protocol: //

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Susan Smith Research Paper Susan SmithIn. (2017, Jul 14). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy