And Patrick Henry Essay, Research Paper
The Similarities and Differences of Jonathan Edwards and Patrick Henry
convey theiThere were many similarities and differences between address manners of the early 1700 ’ s and the late 1700 ’ s. Speakers were known to utilize persuasive techniques in these clip periods to act upon their audience ’ s sentiments. Speakers were besides utilizing an oratory attack to their addresss. Two talkers of this clip period were Jonathan Edwards and Patrick Henry. The persuasive techniques of these talkers were different due to their subjects, their intent, and their messages being conveyed, yet they were similar due to their authorization, their strong sense of emotion, and their belief in their topics.
Jonathan Edward ’ s sermon “ Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, ” was an illustration of a persuasive address in which Edwards used scare tactics to carry his audience. Jonathan Edwards ’ intent was merely to convey a message to the people of the church with purposes of altering their moral and spiritual positions. Edwards frequently appealed to ground and logic and
extremely emotional “fire and brimstone” techniques to convey his point.
Patrick Henry ’ s “ Speech in the Virginia Convention ” was a powerful statement for American Independence. This was an illustration of an oratory attack. Henry used political positions to assist in his persuasion. Unlike Jonathan Edwards, Henry did non utilize the attack of scare tactics, but instead the attack to ground and logic. Both of the celebrated talkers used strong feelings in their persuasive addresss. They besides used Biblical semblances to beef up their points. The two talkers both had to derive the attending of the audience. The talkers besides gained their attending through the fact that they held high societal and political degree places. Through these similarities, the talkers achieved their ends.
In Jonathan Edward ’ s sermon “ Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, ” and Patrick Henry ’ s “ Speech in the Virginia Convention, ” there were many similarities and differences. Their addresss were really persuasive and argumentative, and their strong entreaty to logic and ground made it possible to successfully r messages.
