Transfer Pricing in India Sample

Table of Content

What is reassigning pricing?In today’s universe. houses have the capableness to put its activities at different places/ locations. Increasingly goods and services are traded within the entity from different geographical locations and reassign pricing is used to supervise and account for such intra house activities. Transfer monetary value of 120.

By and large Transfer Pricing is used when there are planetary locations of a same house trade with each other. To better understand this let’s expression at the illustration below diagram:

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Now. the company as a whole is doing net incomes at two degrees: 1. In US. where it is selling to its sister company at a net income of “Rs. 20” . This is usually done to keep internal and unit profitableness. 2. In India. where the company is besides doing a net income of “Rs. 20” by selling the good to the client. This company goes on to pay income revenue enhancements at the terminal of the twelvemonth on the “Rs. 20 – costs incurred in India. let’s say Rs. 10” ( so the company goes on to pay income revenue enhancements on Rs. 10 ) . This is how transfer pricing affects every state. Out of a dealing where the beginning of demand was India. the transnational makes net income in India and at the foreign location. The jurisprudence of transportation pricing regulates how much net incomes an entity can maintain outside India without pulling the revenue enhancement governments. 2 Transportation Pricing in India

a ) DefinitionThe Income Tax Act of 1961 does non explicate transportation pricing. The Indian Parliament approved transfer pricing statute law in April 2001 and the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) issued transfer pricing regulations in August 2001. CBDT defines transportation pricing as follows ( subdivision 92 ) : “One party transportations to another goods or services. for a monetary value. That monetary value is known as “transfer price” . This may be arbitrary and dictated. with no relation to cost and added value. diverge from the market forces. Transfer monetary value is. therefore. a monetary value. which represents the value of good ; or services between independently runing units of an organisation. But. the look “transfer pricing” by and large refers to monetary values of minutess between associated endeavors. which may take topographic point under conditions differing from those. taking topographic point between independent endeavors. It refers to the value attached to transportations of goods. services and engineering between related entities. It besides refers to the value attached to transportations between unrelated parties which are controlled by a common entity. ” The purpose of transportation pricing regulations is to forestall revenue enhancement equivocation by the two associated entities that can affect in dealing of goods and services at an ordered monetary value other than that determined by an arm’s length dealing. Such minutess can take to gross loss and drain of foreign exchange when one entity is in high-tax state and the other entity is in tax-heaven state. B ) Associated endeavors

The related parties involved in the dealing are determined by an “Associated Enterprises” ( AE ) construct. The attached position is determined by placing the direct or indirect direction. control or ownership of one endeavor by another endeavor ( subdivision 92C ) . For case. India recognizes the attached position in the undermentioned instances: 1. One endeavor has equity retention of 26 per centum or more in the other endeavor 2. Suppliers of natural stuff have “effective influence” on the users of the natural stuffs 3. Manufacturer have “effective influence” on the distributer through the finished merchandise 4. One-half of the board members are appointed by one of the endeavors 5. When the two endeavors have “mutual interest” in their relationship Above. “effective influence” and “mutual interest” are obscure footings that may use to several concern minutess in different ways. Their application can be understood from the instances discussed in the Section 3 ( transportation pricing instances in India ) . Enterprises entirely or partially conduct their concern through fixed topographic points in India that are referred as lasting constitutions ( PEs ) . degree Celsius ) International minutess

Transportation pricing merely applies to international minutess. International dealing is a dealing between two or more associated endeavors. either or all of whom are non-residents. for the exchange. sale or rental of any kind of good. services. money or other touchable or intangible assets holding a bearing on the net incomes. income. losingss or assets of such endeavors ( subdivision 92B ) . vitamin D ) Arm’s length dealing

India revenue enhancements international dealing at the monetary value determined by arm’s length dealing. The arm’s length monetary value for an international dealing shall be determined by any of the undermentioned methods ( subdivision 92C ) : — Comparable uncontrolled monetary value method

The comparable uncontrolled monetary value ( CUP ) method offers the most direct manner of finding an arm’s length monetary value. It compares the monetary value charged for goods or services transferred in a controlled dealing to the monetary value charged for belongings or services transferred in a comparable uncontrolled dealing. If it can be used. ‘the CUP method is preferred over all other methods’ . In pattern. this method is frequently really hard to use. as it is unusual for multinationals to hold entree to sufficient inside informations of suitably comparable 3rd party minutess.

Transportation pricing ordinances in most states allow CUPs to be adjusted if differences between the CUP and the related party dealing can be valued and have a moderately little consequence on the monetary value.

ExampleX Ltd. a maker of steel metal bars in Japan supplies Ingots to associate and unrelated metalworks concerns in India. The footings and conditions of the gross revenues to related party and unrelated clients are indistinguishable. except that the related clients are given payment footings of 90 yearss as opposed to merely 45 yearss for unrelated clients. Based on this information. it is determined that the unrelated party ingot gross revenues represent a CUP for the inter-company transportation monetary value and based on prevalent involvement rates. the cost of recognition for ( 90-45 =45 ) 45 yearss should be applied to these minutess for finding the true inter-company monetary value.

Resale monetary value methodAn arm’s length monetary value is determined utilizing the resale monetary value method by subtracting an appropriate price reduction for the activities of the reseller from the existent resale monetary value. The appropriate price reduction is the gross border. expressed as a per centum of net gross revenues. earned by a reseller on the sale of belongings that is both purchased and resold in an uncontrolled dealing in the relevant market.

Example“Designer Shirts. an Italian company. industries and sells interior decorator shirts. Manufacturing takes topographic point at the parent company’s mill in Italy. Its subordinates in US. France and India serve as distributers in their several markets. Through a hunt of comparable distributers of shirts. it is determined that independent distributers earn gross borders of 25 per cent. However. the independent distributers besides design the shirts and charge a three per cent royalty for planing shirts. Therefore. the gross border to be earned by the related party distributers is reduced from 25 to 22 per cent to account for the absence of a design map. ”

Cost plus methodThe cost plus method determines the arm’s length monetary value by adding an appropriate mark- up to the cost of production. The appropriate mark-up is the per centum earned by the maker on unrelated party gross revenues that are the same or really similar to the inter- company dealing. Mark-ups earned by makers could change well from one merchandise to another because of fabrication intangibles that may hold been developed by the fully-fledged maker.

Example“A UK company. Glass Shapes Ltd ( GSL ) . is a specialist glass maker. The company conducts all of its research and development ( R & A ; D ) and fabricating activities in the UK. After the glass has been produced. it is shipped to the manufacturer’s Irish affiliate where it is shaped. using a particular proficient procedure developed by the UK company. The Irish affiliate ne’er takes rubric to the glass ; instead. the unfinished glass is consigned to it.

In this instance. the Irish affiliate is a contract maker. Since the UK Company uses no other contract maker. a Cup does non be from the UK point of view. However. as the Irish affiliate is besides executing fabrication services for unrelated companies. comparable information will be available from these minutess. ”

Net income split methodThis method establishes transfer pricing by spliting the net incomes of a transnational endeavor in a manner that would be expected of independent endeavors in a joint-venture relationship. It might be appropriate to utilize this method where minutess are so mutualist that it is non possible to place closely comparable minutess. peculiarly in fortunes where both parties in a related party dealing have contributed valuable rational belongings. For this method. it is necessary to calculate the grosss and costs of each legal entity involved in the dealing.

Example“Wheels AG ( WAG ) is a German company that manufactures luggage bearers that are lighter than those sold by its rivals and which fold into a little bundle for usage by air hose riders. Key parts are manufactured at the parent company and sold to a subordinate located in the UK. The UK subordinate assembles the finished baggage bearers and markets and distributes the merchandises in the UK market. No comparable is available that would let the application of the CUP. resale monetary value or cost plus methods ; so WAG has decided to use a net income split method to find transportation monetary values. ” Transactional net border method ( TNMM )

The transactional net border method ( TNMM ) looks at the net net income border relation to an appropriate base ( for illustration. costs. gross revenues. assets ) that a taxpayer makes from a controlled dealing. Under TNMM. the focal point is ab initio on minutess ( instead than concern lines or possibly the operating income of a company ) and the statement is that this imposes a greater subject to look closely at the inter-company minutess and to warrant why they may be aggregated together for the intents of the analysis. Any other method prescribed by the board

Provided that where more than one monetary value is determined by the most appropriate method. the arm’s length monetary value ( ALP ) shall be taken to be the arithmetical mean of such monetary values ( subdivision 92C ) . vitamin E ) Keeping Documentation

This certification includes information on the commercial environment in which the dealing was carried on. the analysis done to find the appropriate method to place arm’s length monetary value of the dealing. The certification should besides supply general information such as ownership construction of the endeavor. including linkages and revenue enhancement position of its each entity. It should besides depict the concern. including its activities and competition. The certification should be kept in records for a minimal period of 8 old ages. This certification should be made available to CBDT within 30 yearss when requested by it.

In instance the value of the dealing is under Rs. 10 million. it is sufficient for a taxpayer to keep certification that describes how the arm’s length dealing monetary value was determined. degree Fahrenheit ) Tax governments. audit and punishments

Two officers are involved in transportation pricing audit in India. Measuring Officer ( AO ) and Transfer Pricing Officer ( TPO ) . Each officer has specific duties to execute. The AO. after taking an blessing from Income Tax Commissioner. may mention to TPO to cipher the arm’s length monetary value of a said international dealing of a taxpayer. The TPO shall function a notice to the taxpayer to supply the relevant certification related to the international dealing within 30 yearss. The TPO. after sing all the grounds and certification served by the taxpayer. shall calculate the arm’s length monetary value of the dealing in conformity with subdivision 92C and direct a transcript of it to the AO and the taxpayer. The AO so computes the entire income of the taxpayer sing the calculations made by the TPO and may impose punishment on the taxpayer. The taxpayer can appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax ( Appeals ) at a regional degree. The entreaties can farther travel to Income Tax Appellate Tribunals ( ITAT ) . If there are legal issues so the taxpayer can appeal to high tribunal. *Information taken from

a ) Transportation Pricing. IT Department ( cite a )B ) Price Waterhouse Coopers International Transfer Pricing 2008 ( cite K )

3 Transfer pricing instances in IndiaThe execution of transportation pricing in India is different from the remainder of the universe in certain ways. India Taxes the foreign companies at a higher rate ( 41. 2 % ) than domestic companies ( 32. 5 % ) . It imposes dual revenue enhancement on royalties and proficient fees paid by Indian companies to aliens. The nonsubjective in of Indian Tax Authorities is to find one true arm’s length monetary value. an attack used by some states earlier. This means that unlike states like Singapore or US. where an interquartile scope is used. Indian uses an arithmetic mean construct ( though it allows a divergence from the mean. prescribed by the authorities from clip to clip. Before Union Budget 2011-12 this was a fixed 5 % discrepancy scope ) . The difference of sentiment on transportation pricing. between the Tax Authorities and companies based out of India has given rise to many interesting instances where transportation pricing jurisprudence has been invoked and the tribunals have exercised their authorization. We are traveling to analyze three such instances for better apprehension of the jurisprudence and its deductions. a ) Sony India ( P ) Ltd. vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes Date: 16 October. 2006

( 2006 ) 206 CTR Del 157. 2007 288 ITR 52 DelhiBench: V Sen. S MuralidharDelhi High Court

Sony India ( P ) Limited a entirely owned subordinate of Sony Corporation of Japan is in the concern of piecing. fabrication and distribution of colour telecastings. sound merchandises and other high-end electronic merchandises in the market. The constituents for these merchandises or the merchandises are imported from Sony India ( P ) Limited’s foreign associated endeavor for selling in India. Sony India ( P ) Limited imported the goods and calculated their arm’s length monetary values utilizing Transactional Net Margin Method. Sony India computed the net incomes of its AEs sing them as tested parties with Indian comparable chosen from India database. The method was besides used to cipher the Arm’s Length Price for the distribution activities of its merchandises in India where it considered itself as a tried party. An Assessing Officer ( AO ) for consideration took up the affair. The AO asked a Transfer Pricing Officer ( TPO ) to measure the transportation pricing study for Sony India. The TPO did non hold that foreign Associated Enterprise ( s ) ( AE ) could be taken as tried parties for finding the arm’s length dealing monetary value. So. the TPO submitted the transportation pricing accommodations to the transportation pricing for considerations to the AO.

The AO asked Sony India to subject the adjusted revenue enhancement within 7 yearss. Sony India appealed to CIT against the transportation pricing accommodations where CIT upheld the appraisal made by the TPO. After that. company appealed to the ITAT. Delhi in this respect. The tribunal took a really matter-of-fact attack and made the undermentioned determinations ( Reference vitamin E ) : I ) An endeavor can be taken as comparable. Indian opposite number in this instance. if it’s a related party dealing and it does non traverse 10 to 15 % of its entire gross. two ) Losses along with other factors should be considered such that their cumulative consequence is accounted for. three ) Large figure of comparable should be selected to do a wide based comparing. four ) Tribunal allowed the reimbursement of advertisement disbursals received from an AE. V ) Under use of capacity could non warrant export of colour TVs at a monetary value less than the ALP six ) The Tribunal allowed a tax write-off of 20 % on history of differences in ownership of intangibles and research and development cost from the working capital.

B ) DIT ( International Tax ) vs. M/S Morgan Stanley & A ; Co Inc ( MSCo ) CASE NO. : Entreaty ( civil ) 2914 of 2007Petitioner: M/s DIT ( International Taxation ) . BombayRespondent: M/s Morgan Stanley & A ; Co. INCDate OF JUDGMENT: 09/07/2007Bench: Dr. Arijit Pasayat & A ; S. H. KapadiaSupreme Court of India

Morgan Stanley Group ( MS Group ) is one of the world’s largest diversifying fiscal services companies. It is a world-wide leader in investing banking and it is ranked amongst the top establishments in amalgamation and acquisitions. underwriting of equity and equity and related minutess. They filed on 19. 5. 2005 its progress opinion application in Form 34-C ask foring its progress opinion on the points enumerated herein below.

The basic inquiry associating to the dealing between the DIT and MSCo on which progress opinion was sought was two fold viz. . whether the applier was holding a PE in India under Article 5 ( 1 ) of the DTAA on history of the services rendered by MSAS under the Services Agreement dated April 14. 2005 entered into by MSAS with the applier and the sum of income attributable to such PE as MSAS merely served as a back office.

It has been ruled by the AAR that MSAS should be regarded as representing a service PE under Article 5 ( 2 ) ( cubic decimeter ) as it proposed to direct its employees to India for set abouting stewardship activities and for set abouting to direct some of its employees to India as deputationists in the employment of MSAS and MSCo provides services to MSAS. It is against this opinion of the AAR that the applier has come to this Court by manner of entreaty.

On the 2nd inquiry the AAR ruled that the Transactional Net Margin Method ( TNMM ) was the most appropriate method for the finding of the Arm’s Length Price ( ALP ) in regard of the service understanding dated 14. 4. 2005 between the applier and the MSAS and as the said method meets the trial of arm’s length. no farther income was attributable in the custodies of MSAS in India.

In the terminal. the judgement concluded. that the AAR was right in governing that MSAS would be a Service PE in India under Article 5 ( 2 ) ( cubic decimeter ) . though merely on history of the services to be performed by the deputationists deployed by MSCo and non on history of stewardship activities.

As respects income attributable to the PE ( MSAS ) . the Transactional Net Margin Method was the appropriate method for finding of the arm’s length monetary value in regard of dealing between MSCo and MSAS. It was accepted to rectify the calculation of the wage based on cost plus mark-up worked out at 29 % on the operating costs of MSAS. This place is besides accepted by the Assessing Officer in his order-dated 29. 12. 06 ( after the impugned opinion ) and besides by the transportation pricing officer vide order dated 22. 9. 06.

As respects ascription of farther net incomes to the PE of MSCo where the dealing between the two are held to be at arm’s length. the justice held that the opinion is right in rule provided that an associated endeavor ( that besides constitutes a PE ) is remunerated on arm’s length footing taking into history all the risk-taking maps of the transnational endeavor. In such a instance nil further would be left to impute to the PE. The full exercising finally is to determine whether the service charges collectible or paid to the service supplier ( MSAS in this instance ) to the full represents the value of the net income attributable to his service. degree Celsius ) Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Samsung India Electronics Ltd. ( SIEL )

Date: 20 April 2011Income Tax Entreaties:ITA No. 39/2010 ITA No. 40/2010 ITA No. 120/2010Bench: AK Sikri. ML Mehta

In this instance three income revenue enhancement entreaties which were brought to the notice of the tribunal. merely one inquiry was of paramount importance. ”Whether in facts and fortunes of the instance. the ITAT has erred in continuing the order of Commissioner of Income Tax ( Appeals ) in canceling the add-on made by the Assessing Officer ( AO ) ”

The assesse is a company jointly promoted by Samsung Electronics Corporation ( SEC ) and its Indian associates. . M/S Samsung is an electronics transnational headquartered in Korea. It has 74 % interest straight in SIEL.

The AO asked the assesse to warrant the rights on assorted sorts of natural stuffs which were imported from SEC. SIEL submitted that the stuffs imported were the best possible stuffs at the most competitory monetary values and submitted the grounds of confirmation of the imposts governments which mentioned that they were satisfied that the stuffs were procured at Arms Length.

The AO was non satisfied with this account and said that the information submitted was really generic in nature and was of the sentiment that MNC set up subordinates in other states with the purpose of doing advancement and that the monetary values at which natural stuffs were supplied must be sole. Therefore he disallowed 2 % of the natural stuff monetary values and added that to the assessable income of SIEL.

Feeling aggrieved by the appraisal. SIEL appealed before the Commissioner of Income Tax ( Appeals ) and CIT ( A ) upheld that there was no footing of such an add-on under Section 40A ( 2 ) and mentioned that the stuffs were imported at sensible monetary values. The order of the CIT ( A ) was upheld by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) .

The tribunal made a opinion that. the findings of CIT ( A ) and ITAT were so right based on the above information and besides: I ) CIT ( A ) said that monetary values were more or less changeless and any fluctuation that was seen was due to the fluctuation in foreign exchange rate two ) CIT ( A ) besides mentioned that SIEL was in the concern of white goods where the competition was intense and any addition in monetary values would impact the fight of the company and its market standing and in bend affect the parent SEC. Hence the tribunal dismissed the entreaty.

DecisionFrom the above instances. it can be deduced that the Indian Transfer Pricing regulations are still germinating. The multi-national organisations are non clear on the Indian transportation pricing regulations. They could non place when their lasting constitutions ( PE ) in India are considered as Associated Enterprise and cipher the arm’s length monetary value in the Indian market context. In every instance. the judgements given by the tribunals and the courts reinforced the appraisals made by the Indian revenue enhancement governments. This shows the finding of Indian revenue enhancement governments to avoid revenue enhancement equivocation by the foreign companies in every instance we covered.

The Indian Transfer pricing Torahs and its execution by the Tax governments is among the strictest in the universe. A glance of which can be inferred by the study that was conducted by TP hebdomad that states that India is on the 2nd place after Japan. ( 2010 rank ) . ( Reference i. ) However. this has besides resulted in high conformity with its regulations and a study conducted by Ernst and Young maintains that 78 % of companies prepare Transfer Pricing paperss contemporaneously while registering their corporate revenue enhancement returns. This is higher than the US ( 75 % ) ( Reference j. ) However. there have been. calls for India to aline the Transfer Pricing regulations with the remainder of the universe and make off with the “arithmetic mean” method and travel to an interquartile scope.

There have been uninterrupted betterments in the planetary economic environment. Measuring a multinational’s planetary concern theoretical account is no longer an optional exercising. As India gets more and more incorporate with the planetary economic system. it has to be alert of companies happening revenue enhancement oasiss in India. This will assist India in increasing revenue enhancement grosss by curtailing revenue enhancement equivocations by these foreign companies. With India developing clearer and more comprehensive transportation pricing regulations. foreign companies will happen it easier to setup their lasting constitutions in India and do concern with their Indian opposite numbers at a minimal transportation mispricing hazard. The outgrowth of these new concern theoretical accounts and reassign pricing policies will assist better the effectual revenue enhancement rates. To avail these chances and do the most returns. the companies can take action before set abouting major strategic enterprises. investings and determinations. This will assist them turn to many challenges related to reassign pricing and prehend chances in the India concern sphere.


a ) Transportation Pricing. IT Department. hypertext transfer protocol: //law. incometaxindia. gov. in/Directtaxlaws/act2005/tp1. htm B ) Law of Transfer Pricing. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. cci. in/upload % 5CArticle % 5Cfile % 5CFileKCKXXZHlaw_transfer_pricing. pdf degree Celsius ) India Transfer Pricing Cases. HeinOnline. 9 Corp. Bus. Tax’n Monthly 9 2007-2008 vitamin D ) Judgment. Sony India ( P ) Limited vs Central Board of Direct Taxes. Oct 16. 06 vitamin E ) Tax Hotline. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nishithdesai. com/tax-hotline/2008/Tax-hotline-Oct-1-2008. hypertext markup language. Oct 1. 08 degree Fahrenheit ) Sony India Transfer pricing. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. transferpricing. com/pdf/sony_india_transfer_pricing. pdf g ) Morgan Stanley Transfer pricing instance: hypertext transfer protocol: //transfer-pricing. in H ) Samsung India Transfer pricing instance: hypertext transfer protocol: //transfer-pricing. in I ) Global Transfer Pricing Review 2011. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. kpmgnews. ch/melin/fvault/common/GlobalTransferPricingReview. pdf J ) E & A ; Y Global Transfer Pricing Survey

Cite this page

Transfer Pricing in India Sample. (2017, Aug 20). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront