We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

A Response to Jeremy Rifkin

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

In “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin says that animals are more like us than we imagined and that we should treat them the same way we treat humans. Although Rifkin’s background is impressive, and he is probably very knowledgeable about economic trends in Washington DC, there is little evidence provided that he has much expertise in the areas of animal emotions and their cognitive abilities.

I feel that Rifkin’s argument is weakly supported by irrelevant research and anecdotes.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
A Response to Jeremy Rifkin
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

I fail to understand how “Betty” and “Abel”, the tool-making crows, are supposed to result in my change of heart about animals. Though I certainly feel that we should treat animals with care and regard for their well-being, we must also remember that animals provide an important food source for all the people of the world. In addition, the use of animals for research has resulted in valuable progress in the curing of many diseases.

Rifkin attempts to appeal to our emotions by naming the animals and personalizing them.

He also uses strong visuals, such as the elephant example, that creates a picture in our mind, producing an emotional response of sadness or empathy.

Rifkin states “The human journey is, at its core, about the extension of empathy to broader and more inclusive domains.” Though I feel that Rifkin had good intentions of trying to convince us that we should be more mindful about the emotional well-being of animals that we use for food, scientific research, etc., I feel that our resources would be better spent on improving the life and welfare of human beings, rather than animals. Personally, Rifkin did not succeed in changing my heart about animals.

Cite this A Response to Jeremy Rifkin

A Response to Jeremy Rifkin. (2016, Jun 28). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/a-response-to-jeremy-rifkin/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page