We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

Aristotle Political Views Research Paper AristotleBorn Essay

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Aristotle: Political Positions Essay, Research Paper


Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Aristotle Political Views Research Paper AristotleBorn
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Born in the twelvemonth of 384 B.C. Aristotle was seen as conventional for his

clip, for he regarded bondage as a natural class of nature and believed that

certain people were born to be slaves due to the fact that their psyche lacked the

rational portion that should govern in a human being ; However in certain

fortunes it is apparent that Aristotle did non believe that all work forces who were

slaves were meant to be slaves.

In his book Politics, Aristotle begins with the Theory of The Household,

and it is here that the bulk of his positions upon bondage are found. With the

beginning of Chapter IV, Aristotle & # 8217 ; s thought of bondage is clearly defined. & # 8220 ; The

instruments of the family signifier its stock of belongings: they are animate and

inanimate: the slave is an animate instrument, intended ( like all the

instruments of the family ) for action, and non for productions. & # 8221 ; This

differentiation between action and production, is based upon the apprehension that

& # 8216 ; production & # 8217 ; is a class in which a consequence is desired beyond the immediate act

of making. Where as, the simple act of finishing a undertaking is identified as

& # 8216 ; action & # 8217 ; . Aristotle, who believed that life was action and non production

theorized that slaves were instruments of life and were hence needed to organize

a complete family. In fact Aristotle went every bit far as to state that a slave was

comparable to a tame animate being, with their lone divergency in the fact that a slave

could grok ground. For he concluded that a slave and animate beings merely usage was

to provide their proprietors with bodily aid.

At the terminal of the Theories of the Household, Aristotle explains how

slaves are different from andy other types of people, in the sence that they are

the lone category who are born into their business and go belongings of their

Masterss. In analyzing this relationship we find that he thought that while

Masterss were the Masterss of the slaves, they still held a life other than that

of being maestro ; However, Aristotle believed that non merely was the slave a

slave to his maestro, but the slave had no other life or aim than belonging.

From this consideration we begin to understand Aristotle & # 8217 ; s positions on the

relationship between Master and Slave.

At the beginning of Chapter V of the Theory of the Household, the

distinguishable function of maestro and slave is defined.

There is a rule of regulation and subordin-

action in nature at big: it appears

particularly in the kingdom of animate creative activity.

By virtuousness of that rule, the psyche regulations

the organic structure ; and by virtuousness of it the maestro, who

possesses the rational module of the psyche,

regulations the slave, who possesses merely bodily

powers and the module of understanding the

waies given by another & # 8217 ; s ground.

It was Aristotle & # 8217 ; s positions on the human psyche that gave evidences to his

statements for bondage. It was his beliefs that the psyche was divided into two

parts, being the rational module and the capacity for obeying. Aristotle

postulated that a freewoman was innately born with the rational module while & # 8220 ; A

slave is wholly without the module of deliberation. & # 8221 ; And with his positions he

felt as though it was necessary for there to be a natural opinion order, whereas,

the organic structure was ruled by the psyche, and those with the natural rational module

within their psyche should govern others without. This relationship, Aristotle

found to be an indispensable component in his thought of maestro and break one’s back being two parts

organizing one common entity.

It was his belief that a adult male & # 8217 ; s organic structure was the representation of his inner

ego and that it was nature & # 8217 ; s purposes to separate between those who were

born to be freewomans and those born to be slaves. However, we see that Aristotle

hold somewhat reserves upon his beliefs that all slaves corresponded to his

cast. With such quotation marks as & # 8220 ; But with nature, though she intends, does non

ever win in accomplishing a clear differentiation between work forces born to be Masterss

and work forces born to be slaves. & # 8221 ; we begin to see that Aristotle was non as

conservative as believed. In fact, we start to understand the left-wing

attitudes that Aristotle held. At the terminal of Chapter V of the Theories of the

Family, Aristotle concludes & # 8220 ; The reverse of nature & # 8217 ; s purposes, nevertheless,

frequently happens: there are some slaves who have the organic structures of freemen-as there

are others who have a freewoman & # 8217 ; s soul. & # 8221 ;

Aristotle in his Theories of the Household, allocates a full subdivision

( subdivision 9 chapter VI ) , to the account of the relationship between a slave

and a freewoman who are non of course meant to be as such. It was Aristotle & # 8217 ; s

position that although there are slaves who were born to be freewomans and freewomans who

were born to be slaves, there could be a relationship in such instances where the

two discerning parties would work in a community of involvement and in a

relationship of friendly relationship. & # 8220 ; The portion and the whole, like the organic structure and the psyche,

hold an indistinguishable involvement ; and the slave is a portion of the maestro, in the sence

if being a life but separate part. & # 8221 ;

Aristotle had many slaves himself within his family, and during the

class of his decease and through the execution of his will we happen insight into

the character of Aristotle. He died in the twelvemonth of 322 B.C. and with his decease

he requested that four of his slaves be emancipated. Besides he asked that none of

his house slaves be sold and that they all be given the chance of being set

free at a due age if they so deserved. This act of generousness and good will

gives visible radiation to the attitudes that Aristotle held. It is apparent that he

believed that these slaves had the capacity to be freewomans with the rational

module within themselves to do witting, and sensible determinations. Many

bookmans such as Professor Jaeger, writer of Aristotleles, theorized that many

of the positions that Aristotle held upon the topic of bondage were developed

through the stopping point relationship that Aristotle had formed with an ex-slave. This

adult male was Hermias. A adult male who had risen from the ranks of slave to a prince of

considerable wealth, every bit good as male parent in jurisprudence to Aristotle.

On the general analysis of Aristotle we find that he was a adult male of great

wonder, wisdom and thoughts. Although his positions on bondage seemed to keep true

to the times, he had many fluctuations on the conservative norms and beliefs. He

had believed that bondage was a merely system where both maestro and slave were

beneficial from this relationship. And with this he thought that by nature,

certain people were born to be slaves, yet with these beliefs we find many

exclusions, where Aristotle allocates countries to depict those who by opportunity

became slaves but in his sentiment were born to be free. And in such incidence

where work forces born free were non fit to be Masterss Aristotle explained how it would

be easier for the maestro to obtain a steward who was more expert at giving

instructions to run the family and leave the maestro of the house to more

prudent issues.

We can merely think as to what made Aristotle believe that by the human

psyche one could define whether or non a adult male was meant to be a slave or a

freewoman. And with his statements we find that it was merely as hard for him

to do that differentiation every bit good. & # 8220 ; Though it is non as easy to see the beauty

of the psyche as it is to see that of the body. & # 8221 ;

Cite this Aristotle Political Views Research Paper AristotleBorn Essay

Aristotle Political Views Research Paper AristotleBorn Essay. (2018, May 28). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/aristotle-political-views-essay-research-paper-aristotleborn/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page