To film news reports about crime or dangerous events, directors would have to film constantly to get every bit of information. But news reports can’t always get everything and missed parts ofthe action. so they re-act the situation, which means parts of the information are changed or not revealed, leaving the audience with the wrong information. This can make the responders question if the composers control the truth in media. In the film Catfish, the composers have given us information that was not reliable.
The chat website Megan gave to Nev wasn’t real, which tells us that the conversation and web chats were fake.
Some news articles can be a bit unbelievable because the situation is predictable. Because of this, the audience questions if the composers are manipulation the whole thing. In Catfish, the plot of the documentary is a very common and predictable situation that happens in fiction books and movies, making it hard to believe that this situation really happened in the film.
These examples from Catfish allow the audience to raise questions about the truth in media. In the film, questions were raised about having enough information in the recorded scenes to use in the documentary.
To get the information they eed, news reporters interview people who have witnessed the scene or have knowledge about the topic. Since the people interviewed have personal opinions even though they have witnessed the same scene the story always turns out to be a bit different from each other. The documentary Catfish allows the responders to consider if the composers include and exclude parts in the media shown to the audience. Trailers are made to show briefly what the film is about making it fun and interesting at the same time.
But this can be misleading because they exclude and joined together different scenes like it was originally filmed that way. In the film Catfish, when Nev meets Angela and Abby, they spend some time together at the beach. But the composers didn’t show what they were talking about, making the audience wonder if they purposely muted their voices. Another example which includes and excludes different scenes together is trailers. Trailers and previews are examples of media which are made by different parts of the film. Trailers are made to show briefly what is going to happen in the film by using parts of the films all joined together.
But the Catfish trailer is very misleading and doesn’t explain what the documentary is about. The documentary Catfish allows us to consider who chooses what to include and exclude in the media shown to the audience. The Catfish trailer describes the film differently to what it actually is. The difference between the film and trailers and preview. The difference between the film and trailers/previews can be misleading and The Catfish trailer doesn’t explain what the film is about because they exclude and join different scene together like it was originally filmed that way How do they know if this is the information they need?
How do they know when to film to get the info they need? Who do/don’t they ask to get the info? If the documentary doesn’t edit or exclude unimportant parts, the film would be too long and the audience would get bored and uninterested. Since the people interviewed have personal opinions even though they have witnessed the same scene the story always turns out to be a bit different from each other. Movies show what the composers want it to be. Makes you feel the same way as they do. Makes the good person look good, and bad people look bad. Have control of the situation, news reporter twists story to make it more engaging to the audience.
Cite this Catfish Documentary
Catfish Documentary. (2017, Jul 19). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/catfish-documentary-essay-42528/