Get help now

Deviance is in the Eye of the Beholder

  • Pages 2
  • Words 329
  • Views 391
  • dovnload



  • Pages 2
  • Words 329
  • Views 391
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    Not only beauty but also deviance is in the eye of the beholder, which is what many criminologists say.

    However, when they refer to deviance, they do not mean that everything is relative. There are categories of deviance that set the standards whether or not an act can be considered as criminal. Moreover, they give the context the freedom to define what behavior is fit for punishment or not; and that human behavior depends on the motives why they are being enacted.Consequently, there are two defining ideas of deviance: an act can be criminal and deviant; and an act can be deviant but not criminal.

    In the first category, murder is rigidly and definitely included because it is a criminal act more than that it is a social and moral deviancy. Killing a person is a criminal act and it is being deviant because it is not a norm to kill a person.On the other hand, in some contexts, like in tribal where there is a head hunting season and murdering people is just part of their culture. But in a general and most acceptable context, murder is criminal deviancy.

    The second category is more subjective. For example, in a society where norms are very patriarchal and where the standards of dressing is set, men dressing as women are social deviancy but is not considered a criminal act. Other examples of such deviance come with breaking religious rules.When a member breaks a rule in his or her religious he or she is not subject to the punishment of the social law rather limited to the religious laws.

    What is a deviant to one organization may not be taken against a person in other organizations. The subjectivity of the category depends on the context. As such, when a deviancy is committed, it is not always subjected in the eyes of the criminologists to consider as a criminal act; it is still in the eyes of the beholder.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Deviance is in the Eye of the Beholder. (2017, Apr 16). Retrieved from

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Feel free to contact us anytime, we are always ready to help you!

    Which sociologist makes a distinction between primary and secondary deviance?
    The sociologist Edwin Lemert introduced the concepts of primary and secondary deviance. Secondary deviance may be a result of the reactions that follow the primary devianceprimary devianceIntroduced by Edwin Lemert in 1951, primary deviance is engaging in the initial act of deviance, he subsequently suggested that secondary deviance is the process of a deviant identity, integrating it into conceptions of self, potentially affecting the individual long term. › wiki › Secondary_devianceSecondary deviance - Wikipedia.
    Who is the eye of the beholder?
    A beholder is an observer: someone who gains awareness of things through the senses, especially sight. If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then the person who is observing gets to decide what is beautiful.

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy