Get help now

Leadership Essay Examples Page 24

We found 440 free papers on Leadership

Essay Examples

Overview

Laissez-fair Leadership Style

Leadership

Transactional leadership

Words: 1008 (5 pages)

Leadership effectiveness is unexpected besides true leaders’ behavior. According to Madanchian, Hussein, Noordin & Taherdoost (2017), correct and superb leaders’ behavior is no longer past than to have a democratic and cooperative relationship with subordinates. It is the leadership style of a leader that makes either successful or ineffective leadership. Yet, nonetheless, there is no…

The Leadership Style Of Michael Dell Business

Leadership

Words: 2871 (12 pages)

The first property and most significantly, from the leader is the determination to go a leader. At what point of clip and the leaders decide they want to supply others with vision, and steering the class of events in the hereafter, and inspire others to accomplish success. These people have some features that aid people…

Nursing Leadership

Leadership

Nursing

Words: 1033 (5 pages)

            Good Leadership is a very essential factor in the efficiency and success of any hierarchal operation. Clinics and hospitals also adhere to this kind of top-down management in dealing with their affairs. Strong leadership should be observed in this kind of field since it deals with the well-being and lives of people. Being the…

What Is Participative Leadership?

Leadership

Words: 432 (2 pages)

Participative leadership is a style of leadership that involves all members of a team in identifying essential goals and developing procedures or strategies for reach those goals. From this perspective, participative leadership can be seen as a leadership style that relies heavily on the leader functioning as a facilitator rather than simply issuing orders or…

“Leadership is Action, Not Position”

Leadership

Words: 340 (2 pages)

There are a lot of conducted studies on leadership but Hughes, Ginnett and Curphy’s research on the said topic focuses on leadership as an action and not a position. Basically, leaders are not mainly elected, promoted and created to be in a position to exercise their power rather they are leaders because they possess something…

MBA : Implementing Strategy

Leadership

Organization

Strategic Management

Strategy

Words: 3001 (13 pages)

Strategy is the science of formulating decisions, implementing them and then evaluating cross-functional decisions in an organization. Strategy helps organization to achieve their aims and objectives. It provides a competitively superior fit between the organization and its environment or culture so that the organization can achieve its goals. Strategy basically focuses on integrating management, marketing,…

Transformational and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles Analysis

Leadership

Transformation

Words: 1532 (7 pages)

Introduction Transformational leadership style defines as leaders who can supply an imaginative and prescient and a feel of the mission, inspire, pleasure and achieve respect and believe thru charisma. These type of leaders are inspiring their followers to function in advance of expectations through influencing them to pursue greater and convincing to exchange their self-interests…

A Critical Analysis of Personal Leadership Style

Leadership

Transformational leadership

Words: 8425 (34 pages)

A critical analysis of personal leadership style with reference to classical theoretical frameworks. The aim of this study is to examine my personal leadership style, in the context of some of the major classical theoretical frameworks of leadership from within the wide body of literature available on this subject. I will aim to apply the…

The Effects of Leadership, Power, and Politics in Organizational Performance

Leadership

Politics

Words: 1646 (7 pages)

Abstract             Leadership, power, and politics are various factors that can have an effect on the performance of an employee or organization; they are embedded deep in the heart of an organization and can affect the structure of the firm.             This paper will focus on the effects of these factors on the performance of…

Emerging Leadership Theories

Leadership

Servant leadership

Words: 808 (4 pages)

Introduction In today’s fast-paced world, it can be challenging for a company to not only survive but also thrive amidst constant change. Delivering consistent quality products and services requires effective leadership. As Niccolo Machiavelli once said, “Whoevers constant success must change with time” (1879). Therefore, it is fair to say that perpetual change is the…

Show More
1 23 24 25 60
information

What is Leadership?

‘Leadership is about motivating people, contributing to an effort to do something extraordinary.’ Alan Keith, Genentech Effective leaders are those who can recognize both the strengths and weaknesses of their leadership.

They adapt their current strategies either by adopting new ones and at the same time recognizing both the strengths and weaknesses of other people. They are the leaders who are distinguished for their good reflection and for their ‘meditation’. They are the ones who succeed in adapting their attitudes both in their geographical location and in their organizational level, they are the ones who best deal with the challenges they face. In addition, those leaders who consciously know their environment and apply the behaviors that the environment demands them are the ones most likely to succeed at both individual and organizational levels.

Against society, leaders apply principles that are governed by justice, respect and service of mutual benefit beyond the implementation of the prefectures. To be successful, they not only act ethically but also encourage others to do the same. Intelligent leaders not only offer and apply practical ideas but also help others do the same. Intelligence is also the ability to manage change, which implies any innovation. In the big chapter ‘Human’, leaders create human relationships in order to share and achieve engagements, inspire common efforts, and improve communication among each other – in every form. 

The Leader and the Charisma

It just accepts the existence of the leader whose efficiency is due, to a large extent, to an excellent ability to inspire enthusiasm and dedication. accepts the existence of charismatic leaders within one bureaucratic structured organization. He believes the charismatic leader is the result of a particular sake (sanctity), heroism or extraordinary character (Eisenstadt, 1968). The phenomenon of the charismatic leader is characterized by an interaction between the features of that person called ‘charismatic’ and the needs, values, and beliefs of his ‘followers’. This interaction may in extreme case result in complete and unconditional acceptance and trust in the leader, dedication, submissiveness, a sense of completeness with the ‘co-operation’ on the leader’s mission (Conger & Kanungo, 1987). 

Types of Leadership Forced leadership

Coercive style of leadership implies very tough decisions. Examples of such decisions are job cuts, selling parts of the company, authoritarian behavior towards subordinates, etc. This compulsive-authoritarian behavior leads to:

  •  low employee morale,
  • increased number of executives, • Intimidation and terrorism, and
  •  Inability to make decisions by the subordinates, as decisions are imposed by the bosses alone. 

Employees under the influence of such a leadership lose their sense of responsibility for their work, do not take initiatives, they become cocky and refuse to Self-confident character structure: They are energetic, extrovert and competitive. They are characterized by diligence, determination and vision.

They are capable of devising shots, defining priorities, and working productively and comfortably with others. In exercising their role, they leave space to their subordinates and autonomy in the execution of their work. They demand from them, as by themselves, faith in the goals. they contribute on their own. The wage system is destroyed and the only motivation for work is money and not satisfaction from it. In this way, workers are alienated from their work.

This type of leadership can only have short-term results and should therefore be applied with great care and only in exceptional circumstances, such as in emergency and/or emergency situations. It is appropriate when it is necessary to make rapid changes to the structure of a company in order to eliminate ‘sick’ habits and to awaken the organization of the company so that it can be saved.

On the contrary, this type of leadership is not suitable for long-term implementation, as the reduced employee morale and lack of sensitivity will bring disastrous results. Self-confident character structure: They are energetic, extroverted and competitive. They are characterized by diligence, determination and vision. They are capable of devising shots, defining priorities, and working productively and comfortably with others. In exercising their role, they leave space to their subordinates and autonomy in the execution of their work. They demand from them, as by themselves, faith in the goals. 

Power type

This type of leadership is one of the most effective and can be applied in all conditions – situations encountered in business, especially when they are problematic. The authoritative leader has the following characteristics:  is a visionary,  motivates workers,  perceives the role of employees,  Ensures the greatest possible commitment from employees to achieve the organization’s goals,  sets out clear rules for all, and systematically inform employees of their performance in relation to their contribution to the achievement of the organization’s objectives,  Has a very clear pay system,  is relatively flexible,  has the final say, but leaves enough room for the existing ones to express their opinion and make decisions, and  gives room for innovation, experimentation and allows employees to take calculated risks. In any case, this type of leadership is appropriate for long-term results and not for the short term. integrity, ability and goodness (benevolence).

  •  Integrity. The leader has integrity when his colleagues believe that he has ethical principles such as honesty, consistency, fairness, accountability, and transparency in its decisions and conduct. Honesty means that the leader is honest, moral and moral specific principles which it observes in practice. That is, it leads through in the sense that their behavior and actions are The pillars supported by the confidence and ought to create the leader is: integrity, ability and ability benevolence. tangible examples of what he calls and asks fellow humans to accept and to act. Consistency means that he keeps his promises, he does what he preaches acts are consistent with the words, and that in his speech and values there is consistency and consistency, i.e. it does not ‘reach out and contradict’. Responsibility means that he always assumes the part of his responsibility is responsible for their decisions, actions, performance and acknowledges the mistakes of.
  •  The ability. This means that the associates of the leader believe that he has the knowledge, skills and know-how to respond effectively in his duties. The leader gains confidence when possesses and demonstrates that he is sufficiently aware of the realization of the work he undertakes, has a right judgment, strategic thinking, decision-making, resolution? problems and planning, human abilities, self-sufficiency, optimism, honesty, courage, courage, resilience, organizational, methodical. 
  • Goodness. The third pillar of trust is ‘goodness’ with her meaning that the leader is sincerely interested in the good of his associates, not theirs exploits, cares, protects and supports them at work and their development through guidance, education, encouragement and motivation. Through it, it is influential to people, to gaining confidence, convincing them, inspiring them motivates for high performance and directs them. Through it, it manages resources it has and develops its relations with its environment.  

Conclusion and Democratic Style of Leadership

Democratic style is one that has a lot of time looking for the consensus of the members of the working group. It spends a lot of time trying to ensure trust, respect, and commitment from its members. Many times, following these democratic processes, flexibility, accountability, high morale and realism are ensured by the people in the group.

Despite the above positive results, several researchers argue that the democratic leadership type is not always successful, as its impact on the creation of a consensual climate is less than other types of leadership. The biggest drawback is that too much time is lost – which in many cases is valuable and critical – to re-examine ideas that are already known. Many times, and despite the loss of precious time, the result is that the consensus, trust, and commitment of team members will not be guaranteed, and in the end, processing ideas with these processes can lead to confusion and sense of lack of direction.

Hi, my name is Amy 👋

In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

Get help with your paper
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy