In the absence of trade, each state has to bring forth fabric and doodads because they can non import goods from other states. Therefore, the comparative monetary values are equal to the comparative unit labor demands.
production possibility frontier ( PPF ) of Home and Foreign
What is the maximal end product of doodads and fabric?
Home: L = 2000
if = 0 you are able to bring forth 2000/200 = 10 doodads
if = 0 you are able to bring forth 2000/100 = 20 fabric
Foreign: L = 1200
if = 0 you are able to bring forth 1200/30 = 40 doodads
if = 0 you are able to bring forth 1200/60 = 20 fabric
Slope of the PPF: Home: = = -2
Foreign: = = -0,5
Graph of the universe comparative supply and demand curves
RS = Relative Supply Curve RD = Relative Demand Curve
L/a LC L*/a*LW
Explanation to the Relative Supply Curve:
Up to a comparative monetary value of fabric of 0,5 there will be no supply of fabric.
When the comparative monetary value of fabric is precisely 0,5, workers in Home will be willing to bring forth cloth = level subdivision of the supply curve.
Equally long as the comparative monetary value is below 2 Foreign will go on to specialise in bring forthing doodads and Home will bring forth fabrics.
If the comparative monetary value of fabric = 2 Foreign workers are apathetic between bring forthing fabric and doodads = 2nd level subdivision of the supply curve.
For any comparative monetary value of fabric between aLc/aLw and aLc*/aLw* the comparative supply of fabric is ( L/aLc ) / ( L*/aLw* ) ( in this instance 0,5 ) .
The equilibrium comparative monetary value of fabric would be between 0,5 and two.
The production of fabric in Foreign is 4 times more dearly-won than at Home in footings of doodads and at Home the production of doodads is 4 times more dearly-won than in Foreign in footings of fabric. That means, Home has a comparative advantage in fabric and Foreign has a comparative advantage in doodads.
Cloth ( in footings of doodads )
& gt ;
Doodads ( in footings of fabric )
& lt ;
From this it follows that Home exports fabric and imports doodads and Foreign exports doodads and imports fabric. Both states specialize in bring forthing that good in which they have a comparative advantage.
Both states gain from trade due to the fact, that trade produces imports indirectly cheaper. However, some groups lose from trade.
Question 12 ( 100 % )
Export-biased growing. IF point degree Celsius is the production point with trade Albania has a comparative advantage in B. What means that Albania will export good B. Export-biased growing is growing that expands a PPF disproportionally in the way of the exported Good. Therefore the new PPF is grown disproportionally in the way of good B it is an export-biased growing. After the growing Albania still has an comparative advantage in bring forthing good B
This export-biased growing consequences in a lessening in the comparative monetary value of good B and hence declining the footings of trade of Albania ( as an exporter of good B ) and an betterment in the footings of trade of Foreigners ( as an importer of good B ) . The footings of trade consequence besides worsen AlbaniaA?s public assistance and existent income.
One premise is that Albania is a big state as little states can non act upon the universe monetary values and its ain footings of trade.
Import-biased growing. Import-biased growing is growing that expands a countryA?s PPF disproportionally in production of that countryA?s imports.
If Albania is a big state this import-biased growing consequences in an addition of AlbaniaA?s footings of trade, by and large increasing its public assistance and decreases the public assistance of foreign states.
If Albania is a little state the footings of trade would non alter as Albania can non impact the universe monetary value.
Question 13 ( 100 % )
See the diagram below.
If trade would be unfastened, state P will export fabrics and state R will export nutrient. This is consistent with the Heckscher-Ohlin theoretical account because each state would bring forth comparatively more of that good that uses its abundant resources intensively.
The footings of trade would lies between the comparative monetary values in autarky on the PC/PF axis. The comparative rewards of both states are indistinguishable and prevarication between the rewards in autarky. These statements consist with the Heckscher-Ohlin theoretical account.
In the idealised Heckscher-Ohlin theoretical account international trade would really take to equalisation of the comparative rewards ( w/r ) between states. In world, complete factor-prize equalisation will non happen due to the fact, that there are broad differences in resources, barriers of trade, and international differences in engineering. The existent rewards will non go equal.
The production point will be found above point 5. P will switch its production composing to the labour intensive good fabric because of its copiousness of the factor labour.
The K/L strength ratio in the production will alter due to the fact, that the comparative rewards ( w/r ) are increasing. Therefore the states will seek to counterbalance the now comparatively more expensive labor with more usage of land in the production procedure to salvage money.
Question 14 ( 100 % )
See the diagram below.
Intersection of the supply- and demand curve, that means, at this Point D = S. As you can see in the diagram the intersection is by 60.
Supply: 2 + 0,1x Demand: 14 – 0,1x
2 + 0,1x = 14 – 0,1x
0,2x = 12
ten = 60
Absence of Trade:
Consumer Excess: 0,5 ten ( 6×60 ) = 180
Producer Surplus: 0,5 ten ( 6×60 ) = 180
With free trade the monetary value for doodads is the universe monetary value = 3
As you can see in the diagram the demand at the universe monetary value of 3 $ is 100 and the supply at the monetary value of 3 $ is 10. What means, that the demand is 90 bigger than the supply. This extra demand will be covered through import.
With an specific duty of 3 $ the market monetary value is 3 $ +3 $ = 6 $
As you can see in the diagram the demand at the monetary value of 6 $ is 80 and the supply at this monetary value is 40. What means, that the demand is 40 bigger than the supply. This extra demand will be covered through import.
Consumer Excess: 0,5 ten ( 11×100 ) = 550
Producer Surplus: 0,5 ten ( 1×10 ) = 5
Consumer Excess: 0,5 ten ( 8×80 ) = 320
Producer Surplus: 0,5 ten ( 4×40 ) = 80
By a alteration from free trade to the trade with duty, the consumer excess decreases from 550 to 320 by 230. The manufacturer excess additions from 5 to 80 by 75.
5 $ . Because by a duty of 5 $ on the universe monetary value of 3 $ the market monetary value would be 8 $ like in autarky.
Question 15 ( 100 % )
Alternatively of import replacing industrialisation, some states in East Asia adopted trade policies that promoted exports in targeted industries. Their success refutes the old conventional wisdom, that industrial development must take topographic point via import permutation. These economic systems are sometimes called “ high public presentation Asiatic economic systems ” ( HPAEs ) . But besides this “ miracle ” is arguable. Be it merely the export oriented industrialisation which brought the success? Some economic experts argue that the HPAEs achieved their success by high salvaging rates and rapid betterment in public instruction. So it is ill-defined to what degree the export oriented industrialisation contributed to overall economic growing.
The complexness of the trade policies makes comparings hard because they differ among themselves well in the grade and form with which they reduced protectionist policies. In any instance, export-promotion policies can falsify comparative monetary values every bit good as import protectionist policies, and therefore can take to the same waste and misallocation of national resources
Question 16 ( 100 % )
Refer to the above tabular array.
Airbus will come in the market foremost. That company which enters the market foremost, has an advantage because the other one will forbear from come ining the market because it will non be able to cover its costs. It follows, that a head start represents a strategic advantage.
There is no decidedly predictable scheme for one of the companies because no 1 can be perfectly certain to be better of. It is the same like in reply a. the company who enters the market foremost has a strategic advantage.
With the premise that the information from undertaking a. “ Airbus is set to bring forth the aircraft before Boeing ” besides plays a function in undertaking B. Merely Airbus will bring forth because it knows that the subsidy would non be sufficiently big to lure Boeing to come in the market, excessively because Boeing will non be able to cover its costs. Merely a subsidy of $ 5 million would be big plenty to lure Boeing to come in the market.
End OF EXAM PAPER
Cite this INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS trade theory and policy
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS trade theory and policy. (2017, Jul 15). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/international-economics-trade-theory-and-policy/