This paper revolves around psychologist Jean Piaget and his work. While swaying from the personal to the professional sides of the Swiss psychologist, the research touches on key influences that inspired young Piaget to become such a driven and well respected psychologist. However, the most extensive part of this paper is the explanation of his cognitive development theory and how it evolved. The three main pieces to Piaget¹s puzzle of cognitive development that are discussed are schemes, assimilation and accommodation, and the stages of cognitive growth. In addition to the material on the man and his theory, there is the most important component of the paper, the ways Piaget and his work molded the future.
Now known as one of the trailblazers of developmental psychology, Jean Piaget initially worked in a wide range of fields. Early in his career Piaget studied the human biological processes. These processes intrigued Piaget so much that he began to study the realm of human knowledge. From this study he was determined to uncover the secrets of cognitive growth in humans.
Jean Piaget¹s research on the growth of the human mind eventually lead to the formation of the cognitive development theory which consists of three main components: schemes, assimilation and accommodation, and the stage model. The theory is best known for Piaget¹s construction of the discontinuous stage model which was based on his study of children and how the processes and products of their minds develop over time. According to this stage model, there are four levels of cognitive growth: sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational.
While a substantial amount of psychologists presently choose to adhere to the constructs of the information processing approach, Piaget¹s ground breaking cognitive development view is still a valuable asset to the branch of developmental psychology. Whether or not Piaget uncovered any answers to the mysteries of human knowledge is disputable, but one belief that few dispute is that Jean Piaget did indeed lay a strong foundation for future developmental psychologists.
Abstract 2
Introduction 3
Historical Background 4
Theoretical Construct 7
Impact on Society 12
Reference List 13
In 1896 the summer in Switzerland was just an ordinary, uneventful three months. However, during this ordinary and uneventful span of time, a child was born who would become an extraordinary developmental psychologist and fulfill the future with ground breaking events in the field of cognitive psychology. He was the son of an intelligent man and a stern, smart religious woman, and godchild of respected epistemologist Samuel Cornut. With such scholarly surroundings, there is little surprise that Jean Piaget developed into such an intelligent individual.
At age eleven, young Piaget wrote a paper on albino sparrows and got it published. This publishing provided him with the opportunity to meet a man who would turn out to be very influential, Paul Godet, the curator at the local museum. Young Piaget also benefited highly from his prestigious high school in Neuchatel, along with the aforementioned godfather Samuel Cornut who introduced him to one of the two fields he would grow to love, epistemology, and most of all Jean Piaget¹s parents who not only instilled an academia home environment but also provided a solid religious background.
Another big moment came in the form of a book. Piaget names Henri Bergson¹s L¹Evolution Creatrice as the most influential piece of writing he has ever read in his adult life. He had this to say about it, ³reading Bergson was for me a revelation . . . close to ecstasy,² (Cohen, 1983).
From this book Piaget developed a desire for biology to go along with his existing interest in philosophy, epistemology to be exact.
Piaget stated in his first two books that he had ambitions of constructing a structure that addressed the basic questions of epistemology. However, according to Cohen (1983), Piaget¹s strong initial interest in philosophy declined somewhat when he discovered that the philosophers did not really know any factual answers to questions that have plagued humanity. Piaget now became equally interested in biology and epistemology. This dual interest attracted him to psychology, yet he still was unsure of what direction he should take in his career.
It was not until Piaget traveled to Paris to hear his favorite writer of the time, Bergson, that he began to get an idea of what he wanted to do. There Piaget met James M. Baldwin who would motivate him and teach him, ³the importance of imitation and of reversible operations,² (Cohen, 1983). Both of these qualities would play a key role in the formation of Piaget¹s development theory. However, Piaget¹s major turning point came when the co-worker of the late Alfred Binet, Dr. Simon, requested that he standardize an intelligence test. Piaget flourished in the role of answering complex philosophical questions. Yet, Piaget did not go along with the traditional epistemologists who simply laid back and tried to conjure up answers. Piaget opted for the more biological-type of experiments with epistemology topics.
This method of biological experimentation with epistemology gave
Piaget the motivation to begin testing children and to do what he felt he was destined to do, determine how the mind grows. His result was the cognitive development theory.
The cognitive development theory is Jean Piaget¹s attempt to explain how the human mind develops. A common description of Piaget¹s view of the mind is that it is, ³an active biological system that (uses) environmental information to fit with or adjust to its own existing mental structures,² (Zimbardo & Weber, 1994). Now, to describe how this biological system develops, Piaget breaks the development process down into three main components: schemes, assimilation and accommodation, and the stage model of cognitive growth. Schemes, ³are the structures or organizations of actions as they are transferred by repetition in similar or analogous circumstances,² (Piaget & Inhelder, 1969). In simple terms, schemes guide thoughts based on prior experiences, thus, serving as the building blocks of cognitive growth. Except, with simple schemes, which are the first schemes to develop in a child¹s life, the child has very little, if any, past experiences to guide his or her thoughts. Therefore, early thoughts depend almost entirely on the new born child¹s reflexes to senses. These basic schemes later combine with each other in order to develop more
complex schemes that are more capable of guiding the child than reflexes.
However, the complexity of the schemes depend upon how well and how much an individual either assimilates or accommodates information that is new to the mind. If schemes are considered building blocks, then
the assimilation and accommodation processes can best be described as the construction crews. These two processes aid in cognitive growth by arranging the new information with schemes that are already present in the individual¹s mind. The more new information the child assimilates or accommodates, the less his or her schemes will have to rely on physical objects to create cognitive operations. Of course, according to Piaget¹s stage model, this reliance on physical objects will not decrease until the latter stages of the child¹s cognitive growth.
While both the assimilation and accommodation processes are responsible for establishing a perfect cognitive fit between the scheme and the information, each completes the process in different manners, hence the need for two different terms. Assimilation reconfigures the new data to fit with existing schemes, and the accommodation process restructures a child¹s schemes to ³accommodate² the new environmental information. As Piaget states, ³Accommodation [is] the adjustment of the scheme to the particular situation.² He goes on to give an example of the two processes:
³An infant who¹s just discovered he can grasp what he sees (will then assimilate) everything he sees . . . to the schemes of prehension, that is, it becomes an object to grasp as well as an object to look at or an object to suck on. But if it¹s a large object for which he needs both hands . . . he will (accommodate) the scheme
of prehension,² (Bringuier, 1980).
The main component of Jean Piaget¹s development theory has been addressed somewhat, but a factor of this importance requires much more attention. The key component is the stage model of cognitive growth. Piaget makes it clear that these stages are not determined by age but cognitive development in this very brief explanation of the model, ³The stages are an order of succession. (The development) isn¹t [according to] the average age,² (Bringuier, 1980). He goes on to describe the model as a, ³sequential order,² (Bringuier, 1980) of cognitive growth. The stage model is made of four stages and as one may infer from the statements from Piaget, these stages are discontinuous.
The first stage the child goes through is the sensorimotor. During this stage there is, ³the existence of an intelligence before language,² (Piaget & Inhelder, 1969). While age does not determine the stage of growth, the average age of children in this stage is birth to two years old. Zimbardo and Weber (1994) explain Piaget¹s conclusion on this stage as one where, ³the child is tied to the immediate environment and motor-action schemes, lacking the cognitive ability to represent objects symbolically.² The main task during the sensorimotor stage is for the child to control and coordinate his or her body. While in the second year, most children begin, ³to form mental representations of absent objects,² (Zimbardo & Weber, 1994). Finally, at the end of the sensorimotor stage the child moves rather easily, can identify family members, has developed an understandable language level, yet the child is still, ³illogical, egocentric,
and unaware of his self,² (Cohen, 1983).
The next stage is the pre-operational which has an approximate range of age from two to seven years old. During this time, unfortunately, the child still can not carry out logical operations. However, to reach this stage the child must increase the speed of his or her manipulations, and become involved with more complex tasks. The child also creates mental symbols for physical objects during this phase. Most importantly, though, are the three features that preoccupy the mind during this stage as described by Zimbardo and Weber (1994): egocentrism – focus revolves around themselves and no one else; animistic thinking – believing inanimate objects have life and that they think; and there is centration – in which the child is often too focused on one characteristic of the perception, thus, the child is prevented from understanding the entire perception. Jean Piaget also notes that by the end of this stage the child develops, ³language, symbolic play, and mental images . . [which] . . permit the representation of thought, but it is a preoperational thought,² (Bringuier, 1980).
The approximate age for the third phase of cognitive development is seven to eleven years of age. The child can not think in abstracts during the concrete operational stage, but can maintain mental operations which allows them to solve problems that are concrete such as addition and subtraction. During this stage, the child has a general knowledge of the requirements and guidelines for a complex task but the child can not
complete the task because he or she can not visualize any possibilities. This is because all possibilities are represented by abstractions and the child can only represent objects in the concrete form. However, the child does begin to focus on the entire perception, slowly breaking away from the centration feature that is prevalent during the preoperational stage. Also, the egocentrism that was so obvious during the preoperational stage is usually left behind at that stage. One last improvement in the child¹s cognitive development is that the child now understands the idea of matter conservation.
The last stage of cognitive growth according to Jean Piaget is the formal operational which usually consists of individuals on the average of eleven years old. The child¹s cognitive formal operations, ³no longer relate directly to objects,² (Bringuier, 1980). The child can now think in abstracts and he or she realizes that their reality is not the only one that exists. The child also has, ³all the mental structures needed to go from being naive thinkers to experts,² (Zimbardo & Weber, 1994). Piaget
described this stage best when he said that, ³The great novelty of this stage is that . . . the (adolescent) becomes capable of reasoning correctly,² (Cohen, 1983).
Overall, the schemes, the assimilation and accommodation processes, and the stage model all are constructs that not only support Piaget¹s
brilliant theory, but they themselves are innovative theoretical components.
Jean Piaget was the leading experimental epistemologist, thanks in some part to Simon and Binet¹s work, but he set the standard that would not be accepted by the ethnocentric Americans until they were desperate during the Cold War and decided to open their eyes and accept his findings. Once they did this, they implemented Piaget¹s theory into many American school systems which would have had a much more beneficial outcome had the powers that be implemented the great man¹s work more carefully. Yet, Piaget and his theory have survived and he is labeled as, ³The dominant force in shaping the cognitive-field and perceptual-field theories . . .² (Adelani, etc. 1990). His theory was strong because he placed intellectual development over the child¹s emotional, social, and moral development because he viewed the intellect as having influence over these other developing entities. In conclusion, Piaget summarizes the cognitive development theory best in this
³My secret ambition is that the hypotheses one could oppose to my own will finally be seen not to contradict them but to result from a normal process of differentiation,² (Bringuier, 1980).
Piaget 13
Reference List
Adelani, L., Behle, J., Leftwich, B., and White, C. (1990). Mathematical Readiness: What is it? How do you measure it? How is it used? Saint Louis, Missouri: Harris Stowe State College.
Bringuier, J. C. (1980). Conversations with Jean Piaget. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, D. (1983). Piaget: Critique and Reassessment. New York City: St. Martin¹s Press.
Piaget, J. (1951). The Child¹s Conception of the World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. New York City: Basic Books.
www. piaget.org
Zimbardo, P. and Weber, A. (1994). Psychology and Life. Saint Louis, Missouri: McGraw-Hill Company.
