Get help now

Critical Analysis on “Is it Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater”

  • Pages 3
  • Words 743
  • Views 559
  • dovnload

    Download

    Cite

  • Pages 3
  • Words 743
  • Views 559
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    Critical Analysis on “Is it Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater” Sunaura and Andrew Taylor’s “Is It Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater? ” is an informative essay about the dirty side of the meat industry. They speak out of the physical abuse and poor living conditions endured by animals raised solely for the purpose of consumption. Because of the inhumane treatment towards animals, Taylor talks about a vegan solution and the many benefits associated with it.

    Animal cruelty is a sensitive topic that readers can easily be persuaded to either side. But, for the purpose of this essay, the reader can be swayed towards being a conscientious consumer. As mentioned already, animal rights and veganism will be discussed. It’s hard to imagine when drinking a glass of milk or frying some eggs that animals are enduring harsh treatment in the process of getting such products. Taylor makes a valid point when she says “It is impossible to produce eggs and milk without vast amounts of killing” (203, par 3).

    The author believes that even though animals used for their byproducts are not being slaughtered, they are still being treated inhumanely because of their poor living conditions which lead to many unnecessary deaths. Such living conditions include chickens being tightly compacted with no room to walk and a lack of sunlight and fresh air. According to Taylor, this falls under animal cruelty. By informing the reader of a different manner of animal cruelty, Taylor is able to convince an audience to rethink buying from farms that are inhumane.

    When talking about “equality”, usually it is in reference to people of race, color, creed etc. Not many people include animals to that equation. Taylor says “Some people argue that equality should only include human beings, for no other reason than for the fact they are human” (202, par 3). Taylor accepts as truth that both animals and humans have much of the same “physiological” and “neurochemical” make up. Even though animals do not have a spoken language, they still are able to feel pain and distress. What the author is trying to appeal to the reader is that animals and humans are not much different.

    It is easy to say that Taylor makes a convincing argument comparing humans and animals when she says “if the concept equality is based on suffering then it is impossible to not include animals in our moral framework” (203, par 2). Based on this statement, Taylor expresses her point by placing animals and humans as equals. They both have feelings and are aware of their own suffering. Since the average household has at least one pet considered part of the family, Taylor is able to open the minds of the reader to sympathize for their own animals thus being able to sympathize for said farm animals.

    If eating meat from slaughter houses contributes to animal cruelty, then what could possibly be the alternative? According to Taylor’s beliefs, veganism can benefit all people as well as the ecosystem moreover. “Veganism is humanitarian” (203, par 4). Because a vegan diet consists of all natural foods, it is safe for the planet, and more importantly eliminates the suffering of animals for their meat and byproducts. It is obvious to say that since crops do go further and feed more people, Taylor does make a effective argument.

    There is no question that animals do not suffer when someone chooses a vegan lifestyle, however; one downfall of a vegan diet is the cost. Organic foods as a whole are considerably higher, thus making it almost impossible for some to maintain such a lifestyle change completely. Overall, Taylor intelligently informs the reader of the origins of the meat they consume. The reader becomes aware that farms and slaughterhouses do not reflect on animals’ feelings of distress and pain endured. By focusing on sympathy and morals, the authors are able to convince the reader to become a more thoughtful consumer if anything.

    They [readers] are educated enough to make a conscientious choice to look into how animals are treated by their favorite companies. Not all readers will give up meat all together, but after reading this article, many will look at their food a little closer as a result becoming more conscientious. Will it be vegan or meat? Works Cited Taylor, Sunaura. Andrew Taylor. “Is it Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater? ” Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Sylvan Barnet & Hugo Bedau. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St Martin’s, 2011. Print.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Critical Analysis on “Is it Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater”. (2019, May 01). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/meat-vs-vegan/

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy