Middle Range Theory

Table of Content

Middle-range theory. developed by Robert K. Merton. is an attack to sociological theorizing aimed at incorporating theory and empirical research. It is presently the de facto dominant attack to sociological theory building. [ 1 ] particularly in the United States. Middle-range theory starts with an empirical phenomenon ( as opposed to a wide abstract entity like the societal system ) and abstracts from it to make general statements that can be verified by informations. [ 2 ] This attack stands in contrast to the earlier “grand” theorizing of societal theory. such as functionalism and many struggle theories. Raymond Boudon has argued that “middle-range theory” is the same construct that most other scientific disciplines merely name ‘theory’ . [ 3 ] The analytical sociology motion has as its purpose the fusion of such theories into a consistent paradigm at a greater degree of abstraction. The midrange attack was developed by Robert Merton as a going from the general societal theorizing of Talcott Parsons.

Merton agreed with Parsons that a narrow empiricist philosophy dwelling wholly of simple statistical or experimental regularities can non get at successful theory. However. he found that Parsons’ “formulations were distant from supplying a problematics and a way for theory-oriented empirical enquiry into the discernible universes of civilization and society” . [ 4 ] He was therefore straight opposed to the abstract theorizing of bookmans who are engaged in the effort to build a entire theoretical system covering all facets of societal life. With the debut of the in-between scope theory plan. he advocated that sociologists should concentrate on mensurable facets of societal world that can be studied as separate societal phenomena. instead than trying to explicate the full societal universe. He saw both the middle-range theory attack and middle-range theories themselves as impermanent: when they matured. as natural scientific disciplines already had. the organic structure of in-between scope theories would go a system of cosmopolitan Torahs ; but. until that clip. societal scientific disciplines should avoid seeking to make a cosmopolitan theory. [ 5 ]

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Merton’s original foil in the building was Talcott Parsons. whose action theory Merton classified as a “grand theory” . ( Parsons vehemently rejected this categorization. ) Middle scope theories are usually constructed by using theory edifice techniques to empirical research. which produce generic propositions about the societal universe. which in bend can besides be through empirical observation tested. Examples of in-between scope theories are theories of mention groups. societal mobility. standardization processes. function struggle and the formation of societal norms. [ 3 ] The middle-range attack has played a cardinal function in turning sociology into an progressively empirically-oriented subject. [ 6 ]

This was besides of import in post-war idea. In the post-war period. middle-range theory became the dominant attack to theory building in all variable-based societal scientific disciplines. [ 5 ] Middle scope theory has besides been applied to the archeological kingdom by Lewis R. Binford. and to fiscal theory by Harvard Business School Professor Robert C. Merton. [ 7 ] [ 8 ] Robert K. Merton’s boy. In the recent decennaries. the analytical sociology plan has emerged as an effort synthesising middle-range theories into a more consistent abstract model ( as Merton had hoped would finally go on ) . Peter Hedstrom at Oxford is the bookman most associated with this attack. [ 9 ] while Peter Bearman is its most outstanding American advocator.

Middle Range Theory ( Final )

MRT attack was developed by R K Merton in contrast to abstract theorizing of entire system in all facet of societal life by bookmans peculiarly Talcott Parson. Hence it opposed the expansive theorizing of societal theory like functionalism. struggle theories etc. MRT is an attack to sociological theorizing that integrates Theory and Empirical research. They are constructed by using theory edifice techniques to empirical informations. These produce general statement about the societal phenomenon under survey which can be this verified by informations.

Examples: theories of mention groups ; Social mobility ; function struggle etc. However he agreed with Talcott Parson that narrow empiricist philosophy can non get at successful theory. He saw MRT attack and theories as impermanent that would go a system of cosmopolitan Torahs on adulthood. so before that he says that societal scientific discipline should avoid seeking to make a Universal Theory. Currently MRT attack has become a dominant attack to Sociological theory building and has been applied to other Fieldss like archeology. finance etc. as of now analytical sociology plan is trying to unite MRTs into consistent abstract model as hoped by Merton.

Cite this page

Middle Range Theory. (2017, Aug 27). Retrieved from


Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront