Nucor Case Analysis

Nucor Corporation – Case Study and Recommendations on Strategy Nucor Corporation – Case Study and Recommendations on Strategy Introduction Nucor Corporation: Competing against Low Cost Steel imports deals with leading steel manufacturer Nucor Corporation and trends in the steel industry affecting Nucor. Steel manufacturing is an old business, but is currently facing the fast changes associated with new technologies, the rise of globalization, and changes in cost and efficiency.

To date, Nucor has maneuvered business cycles and market challenges to maintain a positive profit margin in every quarter since 1966 (Thompson, 2008). The company’s strategy of decentralized structure, focus on disruptive technology, unique employee engagement and emphasis on reducing costs has been key to this success. This case analysis will take into account the many successful aspects of Nucor’s historic business strategy against current economic and internal conditions and provide recommendations with respect to Nucor’s future.

Academic anxiety?
Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task
Get your paper price

124 experts online

SWOT Analysis In making recommendations respecting the future direction for Nucor Corporation, it is important to understand both the internal and external operating environments of the company. A SWOT analysis enables conclusions to be made about the company’s current situation (Thompson, Strickland, Gamble, 2008). The SWOT analysis in Table 1 quickly portrays the environments Nucor operates within. Table 1 NUCOR SWOT Analysis Strengths |Weaknesses | |Strong market position |Geographical concentration | |Increasing production capacity |Increasing expenses | |Strong technological focus |Recent leadership turnover | |Strong historical management direction from Iverson | | |Employee relationships | | Opportunities |Threats | |HIsmelt technology |Cyclical nature of industry | |Joint Venture with CVRD |Consolidation in the global steel industry | |Inorganic growth opportunities |Overcapacity in the global steel industry | |Strong Asian steel consumption projected |Increasing raw material costs | |Iron / scrap replacement alternatives |International competition (lower price) | | |Easy substitution of products between sellers | SWOT elements arise from the understanding the industries dominant economic features, as identified by Thompson, Strickland, and Gamble (2008). Through understanding the aspects of product innovation, vertical integration, market size and growth rate, and degree of product differentiation we are able to better assess the competing forces and thus identify the key SWOT elements: threats and weaknesses. Understanding these two components allows companies to fix weaknesses and defend against threats (Thompson, Strickland, Gamble, 2008). The desire to address weaknesses and threats is the primary driver for strategy change. What Nucor Does Well

To date, as evident in the seven year financial and operating summary for Nucor presented by Thompson (2008), Nucor has deftly maneuvered competitive challenges to become one of the most profitable steel producers in the United States. Understanding Nucor’s key success factors in addressing past threats and weaknesses is important as they may be applied to the threats and weaknesses currently facing Nucor. Nucor’s key success factors are: Decentralization of Management – The company employs a decentralized business style distributing the administrative functions and empowering mangers and employees. The increased level of empowerment allows each division manger control over day-to-day decisions that will increase profitability.

This key success factor contributes to mitigating threats related to price and cost including the cyclical nature of industry, raw material cost, and low cost competitors. Strong Employee Relations – Nucor’s employee relations practices were a key factor in their successful growth through the ability to produce steel at margins that could compete with imports. Perhaps Nucor’s most important key factor of success, the building of successful employee relations is more difficult to imitate by competitors than tangible business factors. Use of Disruptive Technology – Nucor has an extremely a strong technological focus. Their introduction of the mini-mill has proven to be industry changing with the manufacture of raw sheet for the auto industry.

Additionally Nucor introduced the first electric arc furnace, continuous casting, the process to avoid reheating billits, and the twin shell furnace. The value added by Nucor technology in mitigating threats is proven by a high sales volume and steady profits. Strong leadership – While Nucor did have a decentralized management structure, it relied heavily on the aligned visions of managers under the charismatic leadership of Ken Iverson. The company did (and continues to) not have a formal mission statement. Nonetheless, all Nucor employees can tell you what their job entails and what the objective of the organization is – the production of high volumes of quality, low-cost steel (Thompson, 2008).

Again, threats and weaknesses related to costs and price are well mitigated through a strong leadership driving the corporate culture to all levels (Thompson, Strickland, Gamble, 2008). Recommendations to Address Threats and Weaknesses In reviewing Nucor’s Key success factors, it is evident that that the threats and weaknesses related to product price and production costs are currently well addressed. Not to imply that Nucor should not manage for continual improvement related to the threats addressed by the key factors, the recommendations presented are directed at those threats and weaknesses not currently addressed. Development of a Formalized Strategy – Nucor has had the luxury of a charismatic leader to drive corporate culture.

As Nucor transfers leadership, the key to smooth transition is to clearly and credibly inculcate the leader’s vision into the firm’s internal structure and governance. Otherwise, best practices may prove to be transient and limited to the leader’s tenure (Thompson, Strickland, Gamble, 2008). Controlled Inorganic Growth – As seen in Thompson (2008) the United States steel industry is mature with low expected growth. Nucor must look internationally for growth as the Asian market has the highest projected growth rate. So while international growth is required to counter globalization, consolidation by lager players, and pricing pressures the growth must be controlled to take advantage of market downturns.

Nucor must examine its current growth projects, and determine whether growth plans are due to the sufficient presence of profitable, applicable project opportunities, or whether projects are being taken on simply to meet growth expectations based on prior growth rates. Continue with Development of Disruptive Technology – As pricing and cost pressures continue to increase the development of disruptive technologies respecting scrap and iron alternatives, and increased use of natural gas will be extremely important in maintaining competitive edge. Conclusion Nucor has had the luxury, through strong charismatic leadership, of a well understood company strategy.

This common understanding has lead to the development of the key success factors that have enables Nucor to excel within the steel production industry. Given the change in leadership and the current economic challenges the opportunity to review corporate strategy presents itself. A SWOT analysis in the context of the dominant economic features presented in Thompson (2008) enables an assessment of current strategy against market and internal conditions. The SWOT identified that the current strategy and resultant key success factors have a strong potential to defend Nucor from threats, but they are contingent on continued successful communication of informal strategy.

Resultantly the key recommendation arrived at is formal strategy development and communication. Additional recommendations, while important to address identified threats, are not major shifts in the direction or strategy of Nucor and as such indicate the strength of Nucor’s strategy to date (Thompson, Strickland, Gamble, 2008). References Thompson, A. A. , Strickland, A. J. , Gamble, J. E. (2008) Crafting and Executing Strategy – The Quest for Competitive Advantage Concepts and Cases. McGraw-Hill / Irwin: New York. Thompson, A. A. (2008) “Nucor Corporation: Competing against Low-Cost Steel Imports” Crafting and Executing Strategy – The Quest for Competitive Advantage Concepts and Cases. 2008

This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

Order custom paper Without paying upfront

Nucor Case Analysis. (2018, Mar 02). Retrieved from