Should we pay college jocks? That is a large subject in NCAA athleticss right now. Peoples think that college jocks work hard and that they deserve to acquire paid. Michael Wilbon is one of these people. At first he was against paying college jocks. but now he is all for it. He says that he is interested in seeing the people that make gross portion a small piece of it. Then you have people like a newsman from the Daily Evergreen. He is against paying the jocks. He states that when you are a pupil jock it is student foremost and athlete second. and that if you start paying college jocks it will set being an jock foremost. I strongly think that college jocks shouldn’t be paid for playing athleticss in college. Paying participants to play athleticss in college can do participants to destroy their calling. do the NCAA to be one sided. and would take away scholarships.
The first job with paying college jocks is that it could destroy a college athlete’s future calling. For illustration. what happens when you give a small child money? They spend it on debris that they don’t need. So the same thing would go on with most immature college jocks. Think about it. you’re giving a adolescent straight out of high schools a clump of money to come a drama athleticss at your school. Adolescents are non responsible with money. A premier illustration of this occurrence is Josh Hamilton. Hamilton is a professional baseball participant in the Major Leagues. He got drafted out of high school and signed a contract with the Tampa Bay Rays for about 4 million dollars. He got hooked up with the incorrect people and ended up blowing all his money on drugs and tattoos. He even got kicked out of Major League baseball for a piece. I think that this would go on to a batch of participant in college if they got paid.
Another job with paying college jocks is that it will do the NCAA to go one sided. It will do college athleticss merely like professional athleticss. The colleges with the most money will hold the best squads and the colleges with the least money will hold the worst squads. The competition would disintegrate. Take a expression at professional baseball for illustration. The highest paid squad in the Major leagues is the New York Yankees. and they are besides the best. The lowest paid squad is the Kansas City Royals. and they are the worst squad in baseball. New York has money to purchase the best participants out at that place. while the Royals don’t. They can’t acquire good participants because of their budget. This is precisely what would go on if college jocks got paid. The college with the highest budget would acquire the best participants in the state. while the college with the worst budget wouldn’t be able to acquire good participants. This will do the same squads good and the same squads bad twelvemonth in and twelvemonth out. It would take all the competition off.
The 3rd and concluding ground that paying college jocks is a bad pick is that it would take away scholarships. Think about it. you are already paying college jocks to play by giving them scholarships. Why would you necessitate to pay them more to play if they have a scholarship already? You wouldn’t. Which means that scholarships would be gone all together and that’s non just to everyone else? What about the people that are non-athletes? They wouldn’t be able to acquire scholarships because they don’t play athleticss. This would do the pupil population to diminish. Lots of people can’t afford to travel to the colleges they go to. The lone ground they can travel is because scholarships allow them to. It’s non right to take away the chance for less fortunate people.
So I think that paying college jocks is a bad thought. It could destroy a participants career giving them a batch of money at a immature age. like it about did to Josh Hamilton of the Texas Rangers. It would besides do the NCAA to be uncompetitive and go precisely like the professional conferences. And in conclusion it would acquire rid of scholarships. which would take away chances of a batch of college pupils that are non-athletes
Work Cited
- Chait. Jonathan. “Fixing College Sports: Why Paying Student Athletes Won’t Work” New York Magazine Mar. 2012. Web. 29 Mar. 2012
- Hamilton. Josh. and Tim Keown “Beyond Belief” New York: Hamilton. 2008
- “College Athletes Should Not Get Paid To Play” The Daily Evergreen Aug. 2011. Web. 29 Mar. 2012
