We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

The Effect Of Concentration Gradient On Osmosis Biology Essay

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Plant cells at all times have a tough cell wall bordering them. When they occupy H2O by osmosis they begin to swell up, but the cell wall prevents them from spliting. Plant cells turn into turgid when they are placed in dilute solutions. Turgid means swollen and tough. The force per unit area inside the cell increases ; finally the internal force per unit area of the cell is so high that no more H2O can come in the cell.

This liquid or hydrostatic force per unit area works in resistance to osmosis. Turgidity is improbably critical to workss since this is what makes the green parts of the works maintain unsloped. Given that murphies are workss the similar thing will happen to its cells, they will enlarge and go excess bombastic.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The Effect Of Concentration Gradient On Osmosis Biology
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

But if a works cell is put in a concentrated sugar solution it will drop H2O through osmosis and go flaccid, this is the precise antonym of turgid.

So, if you so put the works cell into a concentrated sugar solution and besides look at it beneath a microscope you would detect that the interior of the cells have shrunk and pulled off from the cell wall, this would be known as plasmolysed.

But if a works cell is put in a solution which has accurately the similar osmotic strength like the cells they are in a place between turgidness and flabbiness.

The H2O motion of a cell has the potency of upseting a whole being as contrasting to merely a individual cell. This can be achieved through legion diverse ways. First of wholly, if H2O is occupied into a works through the roots the stoping effect will be the hydration of the whole being. Besides, if a works cools down, H2O or perspiration is unconstrained and passes throughout the being.

In this probe I have used many scientific definitions, which I have explained below:

Hypotonic – A hypotonic cell milieus is an ambiance with a minor concentration of solutes than the cytol of the cell. Within a hypotonic environment, osmosis creates a current of H2O into the cell, doing the growing and distributing out of the cell. The growing may possibly steer to the bursting of the cell. A hypertonic consequence has a higher concentration when compared to the cell. Hypotonic means it has a lesser concentration compared to the cell. Isotonic is a status in which the concentrations of the cell and of the solution are in an indistinguishable proportion.

Plasmolysis – Plasmolysis is the decrease of the living substance of cells inside workss suited to the loss of H2O during osmosis. It is while the cell membrane takes off the cell wall and the vacuole collapses when put in a hypertonic ambiance. The contrary of Plasmolysis in works cells is cytolysis.

Hypertonic – A hypertonic cell atmosphere has a bigger concentration of solutes at the outer of the cell. Consequently, in hypertonic milieus, osmosis makes H2O to run out of the cell. If a sufficient sum of H2O is taken off in this manner, the cytol will incorporate such a bantam concentration of H2O that the cell has problem working.

Turgor Pressure – Turgor force per unit area is the hazardous internal force per unit area in a cell resulting from osmotic force per unit area.

Hypothesis

I expect that when there is a high concentration of sucrose the H2O molecules from inside the murphy subdivision will travel off from the murphy and put off into the saccharose. Since saccharose has a large concentration of sugar and a little concentration of H2O, this is subsequent Torahs of osmosis. Once the process has happened, the cell of the murphy will go on to be flaccid. In add-on, as the measure of saccharose in the solution increases the murphy piece will acquire smaller more and as the measure of distilled H2O additions in the solution, the murphy piece will go bombastic.

I expect that the more H2O there is in the solution, the more the murphy cell will swell up, which would do it bombastic. This will raise the entire mass of the murphy nevertheless ; the cells will non come apart as the cellulose cell wall is inelastic. Because of the Turgor force per unit area the interior of the cell will originate to travel frontward alongside the cell wall and supply support to the works tissues.

Variables

There are legion diverse variables which may good impact the consequences of the experiments. They are listed below:

Mass of the murphy piece: The size of the murphy piece must be bantam adequate to suit within the tubing. The size ought to be big plenty to detect an result in mass following the experiment. This variable will be controlled by cutting and mensurating the mass on weighing graduated tables.

Concentration of Sucrose: The concentration of the saccharose must non be overly big, or else the molecules of the murphy will go towards it quickly and the weight of the murphy will lift excessively fast. It must non be overly low or else the murphy will go bigger in size as the H2O molecules will switch from the solution into the murphy. This variable will be controlled utilizing equal concentration of saccharose in every experiment but will be altering the sum.

Sum of Sucrose: The sum of saccharose is the variable which I will be altering. This is because by altering the volume of sucrose but maintaining the measure of the solution stable, the concentration of sucrose becomes more diluted. So, from there I preserve the consequence of different concentrations on osmosis.

Temperature: The temperature should remain stable to keep the probe to be just. The experiments ought to be carried out in the same country with the same equipment to maintain dependability of consequences accurate as possible. It must remain put at room temperature to vouch equity and dependability.

Time: Every experiment must be recorded up to a steadfast clip. It must non be excessively drawn-out or there would be sufficient clip for the H2O molecules to go in or out of the murphy doing wrong consequences. If it is non long plenty so there would non be sufficient clip for osmosis to go on. The clip must remain the same all the manner through the experiments to do certain it is just and to vouch that the consequences are similar.

To guarantee the experiment to be just, some facets of the experiment will hold to be kept the same, at the same clip as one key variable is changed. If the experiment is non a just trial, I will be acquiring the incorrect consequences which could steer me to the incorrect decisions. I have preferred to change the concentration of the sugar solution.

The primary and chiefly the of import thing to make, is to acquire the measurings of the solutions and the mass of the murphy cores every bit precise as possible. This will be prepared to each individual murphy nucleus. I will utilize a ‘size 6 ‘ cork bore bit to acquire the murphy cores out of the original murphy. I will be every bit cutting the murphy cores with a scalpel to do them as indistinguishable in length as accomplishable to do it a just trial. I will clear up how the length will act upon the consequence of osmosis beneath. I will besides be mensurating the length to the nearest millimetre. If some of the non-variables are non unbroken steady, this would so non be a just trial so. If we obtain the murphy nucleus for example. , if the murphy nucleus was taken off with several cork bore bits, so the murphy nucleus would be a different breadth, or else if one murphy nucleus was longer than another murphy nucleus, there would be an rise in surface country which would accordingly intend that there is more surface country for osmosis to take topographic point which would either intend that the murphy nucleus would be heavier than it should be or lighter than it ought to be.

I will utilize the same top-pan balance to weigh my murphy nucleuss because measurings can faintly differ between graduated tables. Before utilizing the graduated table, I will pass over the graduated table as it would hold been used by other fellow schoolmates.

The murphy nucleus to be wholly covered in the sucrose solution is excessively another really of import portion in order to do the experiment every bit just as accomplishable. Because if the murphy nucleus is non wholly covered by the sucrose solution, the result of osmosis will non take topographic point to its fullest and I would obtain dissimilar readings of the mass for each murphy nucleus, which will besides do the trial unreasonable. For that ground, I will utilize 10cm of every concentration of solution for each murphies core. Transporting out the experiments in stable temperature milieus is highly indispensable. The temperature can hold an consequence on the consistence of the experiment. Every trial tubing will be located in the same site at room temperature. On the other manus, this might non make a changeless environment.

Obtaining and experimenting with the accurate measuring of concentration of sugar solution is terribly of import to the experiment. If the sum of one solution in a trial tubing is greater or lower than another, it will act upon the form of consequences. E.g. if the sum of solution is greater than the remainder, it would be instead possible that there will more osmosis taking topographic point, bearing in head that there is extra sucrose solution, while there is a smaller sum of solution in the trial tubing, non as much osmosis will go on. Yet once more, this can non ever be right. I can ever happen out by basically making an experiment where I put two murphy nucleuss of the indistinguishable length in separate trial tubings in the same concentration of sugar solution but with a dissimilar sum. E.g. , one murphy nucleus can be placed in a trial tubing of 10ml of 0.50M of sugar solution and one murphy nucleus can be put in a trial tubing of 25ml of 0.50M of sugar solution.

Equipment

Distilled Water

Potato

Sucrose Solution

Scalpel

Cuting home base

Ruler

Test Tubes

Measuring Cylinder

Burdening Scale

Initially I will do certain that every murphy piece weighs about the same. In add-on, I have to do the surface country available the same. All of the murphy pieces will be cut 4cm by 1cm by 1cm.

Once I weigh the murphy pieces, I will set them into 15 different trial tubing. Then I will do the solutions of distilled H2O and sucrose concentration. The concentrations will change by: 5ml in each trial tubing, each experiment will be repeated three times.

Each experiment will be repeated three times

Experiment No.

Sucrose Quantity ( milliliter )

Distilled Water Quantity ( milliliter )

1.

20

0

2.

15

5

3.

10

10

4.

5

15

5.

0

20

I will set in the dissimilar sums of saccharose to H2O into dissimilar trial tubings.

I will go forth the solution for 24 Hourss and so take measurings.

All experiments will be repeated 3 times and an norm will be prepared to heighten truth.

Safety

Safety spectacless are non a critical portion of safety, because there are non any unsafe chemicals I will be utilizing in this experiment.

Each and every setup must be labeled visibly ; as a consequence at that place would non be any upset.

A first assistance kit must be set aside nearby to salvage clip in instance of a cut ought to go on all through the experiment.

Preliminary Consequences

From my Preliminary Results, I am to seeking to happen out:

If the length I have chosen is a good pick

If I will alter the concentrations

If the method should be changed or non

Concentration

Before mass ( g )

After mass ( g )

Difference in mass ( g )

Average difference in Mass ( 2.DP )

1M ( 20ml of Sucrose )

2.95

2.92

2.94

1.61

1.63

1.62

-1.34

-1.29

-1.32

-1.32

0.75M ( 15ml of Sucrose and 5 milliliter of Distilled H2O )

2.76

2.76

2.75

1.56

1.57

1.56

-1.20

-1.19

-1.19

-1.19

0.50M ( 10ml of Sucrose and 10ml of distilled H2O )

2.88

2.88

2.87

1.93

1.93

1.95

-0.95

-0.95

-0.92

-2.82

0.25M ( 5ml of Sucrose and 15ml of Distilled Water )

2.91

2.90

2.91

2.87

2.86

2.87

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

-0.04

0M ( 20ml of Distilled Water )

3.04

3.04

3.06

3.39

3.36

3.35

+0.35

+0.32

+0.29

+0.32

Preliminary Results-Changes to be made for Actual Experiment

If the length I have chosen is a good pick

To cut the murphy piece to 4cm took a long clip, the length was besides excessively large, so hence for the existent experiment, every murphy will be 3cm by 1cm by 1cm.

If I will alter the concentrations

The concentrations used are perfect and the consequences given are consistent.

If the method should be changed or non

The method used was well-organized and straightforward. It was tremendously simple to retroflex and since I have carried it out legion times I have become used to the method, so the method will non be changed and will be the same as the Prelimary experiment.

Actual Consequences

Exp. No.

% Sucrose

% Water

Volume ( cm3 )

Initial Mass ( g )

Concluding Mass ( g )

Change in Mass ( g )

Average Change in Mass ( g )

% Difference

Average % Difference

1

100.00 %

0.00 %

20

1.87

0.86

-1.01

-54.01 %

2

100.00 %

0.00 %

20

1.89

0.87

-1.02

-54.00 %

3

100.00 %

0.00 %

20

1.87

0.86

-1.01

-1.01

-54.01 %

-54.00 %

Exp. No.

% Sucrose

% Water

Volume ( cm3 )

Initial Mass ( g )

Concluding Mass ( g )

Change in Mass ( g )

Average Change in Mass ( g )

% Difference

Average % Difference

1

75.00 %

25.00 %

20

1.92

1.15

-0.77

-40.10 %

2

75.00 %

25.00 %

20

1.94

1.12

-0.82

-42.30 %

3

75.00 %

25.00 %

20

1.93

1.13

-0.80

-0.80

-41.50 %

-41.30 %

Exp. No.

% Sucrose

% Water

Volume ( cm3 )

Initial Mass ( g )

Concluding Mass ( g )

Change in Mass ( g )

Average Change in Mass ( g )

% Difference

Average % Difference

1

50.00 %

50.00 %

20

1.92

1.61

-0.31

-16.15 %

2

50.00 %

50.00 %

20

1.89

1.50

-0.39

-20.63 %

3

50.00 %

50.00 %

20

1.91

1.57

-0.34

-0.35

-17.80 %

-18.19 %

Exp. No.

% Sucrose

% Water

Volume ( cm3 )

Initial Mass ( g )

Concluding Mass ( g )

Change in Mass ( g )

Average Change in Mass ( g )

% Difference

Average % Difference

1

25.00 %

75.00 %

20

1.92

2.02

0.10

5.21 %

2

25.00 %

75.00 %

20

1.89

2.00

0.11

5.82 %

3

25.00 %

75.00 %

20

1.91

2.01

0.10

0.10

5.24 %

5.24 %

Exp. No.

% Sucrose

% Water

Volume ( cm3 )

Initial Mass ( g )

Concluding Mass ( g )

Change in Mass ( g )

Average Change in Mass ( g )

% Difference

Average % Difference

1

0.00 %

100.00 %

20

1.89

2.22

0.33

17.46 %

2

0.00 %

100.00 %

20

1.90

2.30

0.40

21.05 %

3

0.00 %

100.00 %

20

1.91

2.25

0.34

0.36

17.80 %

19.77 %

Decision

After the finishing point of the probe I can convey to a stopping point, that correct consequences were produced. I have presented my informations in two ways, graphs and the tabular arraies above. I drew graphs because you are able to descry any tendencies. My consequences obviously show the comparing between increasing the concentration of sucrose-mass of murphy will diminish. My graph can be said to be a consecutive line, so my consequences are accurate and dependable. From my result I can see that as the concentration of sucrose additions, there is a steady addition in the per centum alteration of the murphy mass.At highest concentration the murphy has lost the most aggregate – 54 % , this will be called flaccid. So, the concentration gradient was at its upper limit, for this ground the highest rate of osmosis took topographic point at this concentration. Still, as the sucrose concentration altered to lesser values the loss in mass from the murphy besides decreased. Once the concentration of sugar was wholly H2O, the murphy had gained mass 20 % . Osmosis of H2O molecules was presently traveling on back into the murphy. At that point the Potato Cells were Turgid. From the result I can state that my anticipation was right. At high sucrose concentrations the murphy lost mass and became flaccid, and at little sucrose concentrations the mass enlarged. This would be because of osmosis taking topographic point, the H2O molecules traveling from low concentration of saccharose to the high solution in the murphy.

.Evaluation

On the whole, the probe was good. As I did a preliminary experiment, I could do alterations to the Actual Experiment.

From looking at the 3 graphs and the tabular arraies, it can be said, there were no anomalous consequences. This can be said because the values are precise and accurate with each other.

The method used was well-organized and dependable upon. I used the same method in the preliminary and the Actual Experiment, this was good for me as I got used to the method and the whole experiment became easier for me. In the experiment, I could hold improved truth, if I did the experiment farther times. I could hold besides tested more Sucrose concentrations. Besides, I could hold measured every hr alternatively of 24 hours. I can besides transport out an probe into how osmosis is affected when it takes topographic point in different conditions, i.e. Low and High temperature.

Cite this The Effect Of Concentration Gradient On Osmosis Biology Essay

The Effect Of Concentration Gradient On Osmosis Biology Essay. (2016, Dec 10). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/the-effect-of-concentration-gradient-on-osmosis-biology-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page