In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, composed in the late nineteenth century, the creator suggests that learning and innovation can be hazardous to people and all of humanity. In the conﬂict between morality and science it is less intense in the real world today than in the ﬁctional world of Frankenstein. In today’s world knowledge and new technology is widely accepted and rewarded unlike it was back when Frankenstein was composed. Frankenstein was one of the ﬁrst useful examples of logical research. Shelley’s novel offers a profound understanding of the consequence of ethically coldhearted logical and technological look into. “Learn from me… at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow”.
At the time the novel was composed, England was on the precarious edge of leading the Industrial insurgency in Europe. The analyses of Huntsman (crucible steel fabricate), Newcome (steam-controlled pumps), and Cochrane (coal tar production) all through the eighteenth century in England were deﬁnitive in the initial change of England into an industrialized nation. The developing age of technology appears to have discovered devotees throughout the culture and to have progressed toward becoming solidly strengthened by the time Frankenstein was written. Eric Rabkin (writer), says that in England right on time in the eighteenth century, “there exist a crowded talk network that acknowledged the rhetoric of science.”
This talk has evidence reaching out back to the English Renaissance. Those touchy to change and those arranged to grasp a rhetoric of change require not be scientists. While researchers address a discourse community of researchers, writers address a more extensive talk network of the literate. If we can acknowledge the earlier contention that science and verse are not ontologically adversarial, at that point we may well expectation to ﬁnd anecdotal. In conclusion the changes in technology and the industrial insurgency in Europe during the time of the book Frankenstein made it very intense in the ﬁght between morality and science.
Another key influence on Shelley’s work was the literary and philosophical movements of her time. Frankenstein was written during the Romantic era, a period characterized by a focus on emotion, imagination, and individualism. Shelley’s work also reflects the influence of the Gothic genre, which was popular at the time and is characterized by dark, mysterious, and supernatural elements. Additionally, Shelley’s work was influenced by the scientific and philosophical debates of her time, particularly the debates surrounding the nature of life and the limits of human knowledge.
Shelley was also part of a discourse community of writers, artists, and intellectuals who shared a common set of values, beliefs, and aesthetic preferences. This community included writers such as Percy Bysshe Shelley, Lord Byron, and John Keats, as well as other artists and thinkers of the time. Shelley’s work was influenced by the ideas and perspectives of this community, as well as by the feedback and criticism she received from her peers. Overall, Mary Shelley’s composition of Frankenstein was shaped by a range of factors, including her personal experiences, the literary and philosophical movements of her time, and the discourse community of which she was a part. These influences helped to shape the themes, characters, and style of Shelley’s work, and contributed to its enduring popularity and significance.