The most common length of time a person had been staying in the area was 6-10 years. I think the differences between Chapel Ash, Merryhill and Tettenhall is to do with the housing prices and the facilities in that area like local shops and businesses.
The results from the questionnaire showed people were most likely to move into the area for work and social reasons. The people that moved for work would be either skilled workers or just people looking for jobs. The sphere of influence however for people moving into the area is country wide this means people come from all over the UK most people we asked moved from Birmingham or moved from another part of Wolverhampton.The House age vary the oldest houses were in Chapel Ash where they were built in the 1900’s merry hill were mostly 1930’s and finally Tettenhall 1950’s.
Looking at the Burgess model the inner city which is Chapel Ash has the oldest houses but gradually moving out they get newer this shows Chapel Ash was built first and as the population increased they started building more houses around Chapel Ash like Tettenhall then finally the newest houses are on the outer suburbs with the newest houses so as the population increases then they continue to build outwards. Tettenhall doesn’t completely fit the trend however this maybe because the area was sparse and has spread out housing and so it has a variety of different aged houses.The Facilities in the area the locals voted pretty low at an average of 3 Tettenhall has the best reviews with an average of 8 Chapel Ash however has the least facilities at an average of 1 this may be because Chapel Ash is in the centre and there is not much space for building. People would like to see traffic management and youth control as they feel the streets have become a little corrupt and busy.
In total we filled in around 30 questionnaires in each of the areas this gave us an idea and a range of views on what people thought, we asked a variety of different aged people to make it more reliable but this was not easy as we gathered the information on a school day and the people that were out were older or didn’t have a job. The best way would have been to ask more people of different age ranges.A house in MerryhillTraffic countThe busiest areas would be Tettenhall and Chapel Ash. Chapel Ash because it has a bigger population.
The volume gets smaller by about 100 as you go further from the main streets as the main streets include small businesses and places to visit there the smaller roads are quieter. The most common vehicle we saw was cars and I would most certainly expect to see more of them in the outer suburbs because in the inner city there is more variety of vehicles used for different things. Car is the most popular as on average most households have at least one car as they have family houses and the cars are used to drive to school etc. There is also Tettenhall with it having lots of small industries all spread out where as Merryhill is all one big one close together and there is no such noticeable industry in Chapel Ash.
From the inner city you would expect the age to be younger than the outer city due to jobs and schools. The inner suburbs possibly with the oldest age with maybe a smaller ethnic variety e.g. Sikh, Christian, Hindu but the outer suburbs would be older possibly more facility with a possible concentration in ethnicity in the inner city.
My results however fit the burgess model as most of the cars were heading into the CBD whereas there were less coming out it also showed the busiest were in the centre of Wolverhampton like Chapel Ash and Tettenhall which fits the burgess model as the closer to the centre it is the busier it should be. The population increases and so this causes the suburbs to grow this process is called Suburbanisation.The reasons why there is a greater range of public transport in the inner city is because firstly more people would use it like busses and so the bus company would get more money there is also a shorter distance to travel as the houses are closer together whereas in the outer suburbs the houses are spread around. And lastly there are less facilities in the outer suburbs for public transport to go to and so there tends to be less transport for people to use but there are some going to main places like schools etc.
Flats in Chapel Ash -Pedestrian countMerry hill was the busiest area with 10 people walking towards the main street and 5 people walking away from the main street. We timed 5 minutes as we counted. I think this was the busiest because the main street consisted of shops and many local businesses this could mean they were going for their shopping etc. You would expect the age to be younger on the inner city as they are the smaller and older houses which may turn out cheaper because land value is cheapest.
The ethnicity however is spread. An example of anomalies in my data was the different places we received the information some were on the main streets like for Merryhill and Chapel Ash however Tettenhall we were down a smaller street which hardly any people use. And so we only got 3 for this.This could mean Tettenhall Main Street could be busier.
My results don’t fit the Burgess model because of the places we stood to take the count we found that in the inner city it was busier than on the outer suburbs as Chapel Ash and Merryhill were the busiest however Tettenhall didn’t seem to have many people around. And also it was raining quite hard when we went to Chapel Ash and merry hill and so less people would be out however by the time we arrived at Tettenhall it had stopped.Extension – Secondary DataI found out the population density for the 3 areas. I then compared them to the Burgess Model if it fit the Burgess model it would mean there would be more people in the inner city so Chapel Ash and less people on the outer Suburbs so Tettenhall.
I found out that Chapel Ash which is the inner city has 1405 people which is lower than the outer suburbs which is Tettenhall which has 1501 and Merryhill which has 1504 people. So this shows the population doesn’t fit the Burgess Model because Burgess predicted population would be most dense in the inner city but this possibly shows that lots of the properties are actually business premises or derelict or empty.We also did house prices we found the average price of a house in Tettenhall was �331.000 and this was a 4 bedroom house with 2 bathrooms and a garden.
The average for Merryhill is �207.000 which was also a 4 bedroom house with 2 bathrooms and a garden and finally Chapel Ash the average house price is �202.00 which is the same size house as the others. This shows the house prices are cheaper inside the CBD moving outwards they rise in price.
ConclusionAims:* What does quality of life mean?* How does the quality of life vary between the inner city, inner suburban and outer suburban area?* How does the environmental quality differ between the three areas?* How does the traffic density and type change from the inner suburbs to the three areas* Why does the type of person, occupation and wealth differ across the three areas?* What secondary evidence is there to support my conclusions on government websites?Housing type and qualityQuality of life is the degree of well being felt by an individual group of people, unlike standards of living quality of life is not a tang able thing. The Quality of life improves the further out you get for example the litter count was worse in the inner city like Chapel Ash but as for Tettenhall there was hardly any. There is also the Quality of housing this also improves in areas like merry hill and Tettenhall but as for Chapel Ash they are smaller and a lot older and the area around it isn’t as clean.The housing type differs in age and the quality improves the questions that I got my information from to prove this were ‘What type of house do you live in’ when was your house built’ and finally’ improvements you would like to see in the area’ Tettenhall is a suburbanised village because most of the residents don’t work there they work in larger area’s and businesses outside Tettenhall.
Most of these people live in newer housing and the commuters will use services in theCentre of the city or in out of town shopping centres. The evidence from the data collection to prove this theory are some questions from the questionnaire we asked the people of Tettenhall ‘ where do you do your main shopping’ and ‘ where do you work’ this proves this theory because most of them said outside Tettenhall. This supports the following hypothesis what does quality of life mean and how does the quality of life vary between the inner city, inner suburban and outer suburban area?ServicesThe shops change heading out they are a lot better quality in the inner city the businesses are of a higher class. They have main shopping centres all over the place but the inner city has a lot of middle class and poorer people so they high street shops would be in the centre.
On the outer suburbs however the people seem more of a higher class and the shops seem to be a lot more expensive and there are a lot less. There are a range of takeaways in Chapel Ash but not in Tettenhall I think this is because some people in Chapel ash work late and outside of Chapel Ash and so It takes them a while to get back and so it is easier just to pick up a takeaway on the way home.We asked the people doing the questionnaires if they wanted any more services or changes in the area. In Chapel Ash we had people asking for More facilities for Children and maybe a mother and baby club and also more schools and places of learning.
The people of Tettenhall wanted more schools and finally Merryhill wanted places to stop gangs and to make the people feel safer in their own homes they would also like to see more police. This is evidence that the services change in the different parts of the city because Chapel Ash and Merryhill picked up on things for children more facilities but only Merryhill wanted more police to stop gangs.This in comparison with the Burgess Model does not fit as the inner city seems to have everything except schools Merry hill is in the middle wanted protection you would of guessed to of wanted this from Chapel Ash people and finally Tettenhall also wanted more schools. It shows that it is spread about what is needed and it is not all in one place.
However this does not fit the burgess model. This does not support the following hypothesis what are the services like for the people living in the different parts of the city? This is because it is more or less the same in each area and I expected there to be lots in the inner city but none in the suburbs. However Tettenhall used to be its own village before the main city suburbanised it.In a cul-de-sac in Tettenhall -Environmental QualityThe environmental quality improves moving outward the inner city which is Chapel Ash had the most litter and the streets were dirty and covered in waste moving out however the streets gradually got cleaner we took a litter count at chapel ash on a little side streets we found 60 pieces of litter bearing in mind this was just a side street the main streets were a lot worse moving to Merryhill however also a side street we found 20 pieces of litter the main streets weren’t as bad but there were a lot more bins around in Chapel Ash I only saw one bin and that was on a main street in Merryhill I saw 5 in total.
Tettenhall however in the main streets there were no litter the side streets however there were the odd bottle and crisp packet. This shows they are a lot cleaner we came past 8 bins and 5 of them were empty the other 3 were full this shows people must put there litter in the bin and people come to collect it also the streets were clean this could show that people come from the council and pick it up to make it a better place to live.We also took a traffic count there were more cars in the inner city than the outer suburbs this could mean cleaner air and healthier people, pants and animals. There was 3 times the amount of vehicles in Merryhill than in Chapel Ash and double the amount in Merryhill than Tettenhall this fits the Burgess model as the Burgess model shows the outer suburbs to be a richer place.
These results show this as it makes Chapel Ash seem busy and overcrowded whereas it shows Tettenhall to be a clean and healthy environment to be in. This supports the following hypothesis that the environmental quality change in the different parts of the city and it is nicer in the suburbs than the inner city.A car and house in Merryhill -Additional MethodsThe extra method I did was the population density between the 3 areas it doesn’t fit my original hypothesis though as I thought there would be more people living in the inner city than the outer suburbs. The results were more or less the same and seem to be an even number of people living in the different places.
I think as the quality of life changes moving outwards on the Burgess model I think the wealth and health of the people change and there is an even number of people living in each area possibly because there were a lot of terraces in Tettenhall as it is a suburbanised village. Also, around West Park in Chapel Ash there were professional businesses. Like chanted accountants, so people don’t actually live in that house, so they do not count towards the population density.ExtensionTo the extent Wolverhampton does and doesn’t fit the Burgess model.
Firstly the aspects that do fit the Burgess model, these are things like the traffic going in and out of the CBD in each part of the city we find there are more going in towards the CBD than coming out and there seems to be more traffic in the inner city than the outer suburbs. Secondly the environmental quality there are dramatic changes from the inner city to the outer suburbs this includes things like litter and pollution this fits the Burgess model exactly how I would have though as it is a lot better improved on the outer suburbs than the inner city.On the other hand though things like population density do not fit the burgess model this was my secondary data and so this is unlikely to be incorrect it doesn’t fit the burgess model as if it would fit it then there would be more people in the inner city than the outer suburbs.Chapel ash -EvaluationImprovement – Take traffic count in different streets in each of the areas.
How might these changes change the results? – Well at the moment I took the traffic count data in some places on main streets and others on side streets this could vary the data dramatically and make it unreliable. It could change the results as we may see it doesn’t fit the burgess model at all and there could be more cars in one area than the other. The thing that may stay the same however is the amount of cars going in and out of the CBD I think it will stay the same which is more people heading into the CBD and less people coming out.Why might these changes happen? – These changes may happen as the data I have at the moment could be seen as unreliable I could try doing all main streets or doing all side streets or even do more than one street in a certain area.
Improvement – Take more questionnaires.How might there be improvements change the results? – More questionnaires equals more results more results, more results equals more reliable data. What I found is that I didn’t receive much data in the areas where it was quiet like Tettenhall but when I went to busier places I had more people to ask to do the questionnaires. These could improve the results as we would have a range of data in each area.
Why might these changes happen? – If there is more data then there is more reliable results and easier for us to spot anomalies. There could also be different age ranges as I only asked the people that went working and are quite old around 40+ ages I had the most questionnaires from. This could change as the older generation might just have a house with 2 people living in it whereas a family house would cost more this could change the house prices and the house type.Improvement – Write down the different transport when I took the traffic count.
How might the improvement change the results? – This wouldn’t change the result but it would give more information on the type of transport is used in different parts of the city. There is also the type of cars this could show the type of people going in and out of the city to see what class they are in.Why might these changes happen? – These changes might happen because the more information the more reliable the results will be.Improvement – Show the different times of litter found and explain how much of each there was and see when the bin is collected and where the litter seems to be.
How might these improvements change the result? – These improvements wouldn’t change if it fits the burgess model but we would be able to see if the council has daily/ weekly bin collections and see if they are environmentally friendly and they have a clean city. For the different types of litter we would be able to see what could be done about keeping it clean and what is causing it like crisp packets could be down to corner shops.Why might these changes happen – these changes might happen because the burgess model shows the inner city is a lot dirtier and a lot more polluted and less environmentally friendly than the outer suburbs. If we looked at different places we could see there was just as much rubbish in the outer suburbs than the inner city.Improvement – Take more pictures to add in my coursework.How might this change the result? – to look at the actual housing from a primary source could change what you think about the data I have collected like pictures of a certain area you could see if it is clean or not or pictures of a house you could see if it better quality.Why might these changes happen – these changes might happen because this would be a primary source.
