Analysis: Voices of Freedom

Read Summary
Summary

On the other hand, moral liberty is defined as the Good liberty. It means that individuals have the freedom to do what is right, according to their conscience and God’s will. Puritans believed in this concept of liberty, but it had its limitations. They believed that individuals were free to do what was right, but only within the boundaries of God’s law. Any deviation from this law was considered a sin, and the person was punished accordingly. John Winthrop’s speech in Voices of Freedom highlights the importance of moral liberty for the Puritans. He believed that the colony’s success depended on the people’s ability to adhere to God’s laws and live a righteous life. He warned against the dangers of natural liberty and the chaos that would ensue if people were allowed to do as they pleased without regard for moral principles.Overall, the concept of liberty and freedom had a significant impact on the Puritan society. While they believed in the importance of moral liberty, they also recognized its limitations and the consequences of deviating from God’s laws. The cases of Anne Hutchinson and Roger Williams illustrate the consequences of going against these laws and the strict punishments that were imposed on those who did.

Table of Content

John Winthrop distinguished between natural liberty and moral liberty, viewing the former as associated with evil, while the latter represented the pursuit of goodness. The Puritans had their own understanding of freedom and stressed moral liberty as a means to lead a virtuous life. Nevertheless, this notion of moral liberty had limitations, evident in Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson’s experiences. In his address found in the “Voices of Freedom” box, Winthrop discussed the perils of natural liberty and the significance of moral restraint. The line distinguishing good from evil is subjective since each individual has their own perspective on it. Winthrop detected malevolence within what he termed as natural liberty.

He viewed the good as moral liberty. Each has been defined over the years and you have to choose which side you will be on. John Winthrop was the Governor of the Massachusetts Bay colony. He was one of the founders and was also a puritan leader. Natural liberty is defined as the “Evil” liberty. It is when men act as beasts and other creatures. Meaning that mankind has the right to choose what they feel like and who to obey. The natural liberty according to John Winthrop goes against authority, god, and purity.

Anne Hutchinson and Roger Williams, in opposition to John Winthrop, advocated for natural liberty, leading to their expulsion from the Massachusetts colony. Hutchinson disregarded societal norms by claiming that she was a vessel through which God spoke to others. She convened meetings at her residence to engage in theological discussions and share her beliefs. John Winthrop and others regarded her actions as utterly nonsensical, resulting in her exile from the colony. Hutchinson was banished to the New York colony, where she ultimately met her demise during an Indian raid.

Cite this page

Analysis: Voices of Freedom. (2018, Feb 01). Retrieved from

https://graduateway.com/analysis-voices-of-freedom/

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront