We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Azalea Seafood Gumbo Shoppe – Case Analysis Essay

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

The first mentioned is very hard to do from the position of a small producer because of large corporations on the other side f the TABLE and the second one was not successful because of insufficient attention from the brokers side. Also the reason for getting larger market share is to use free production capacities which are now at approximately 60 Competitive forces in the seafood industry The current situation (year 2000) in the value added seafood industry is influenced by four competitive forces: competitors, suppliers, buyers or customers and firms offering substitutes.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Azalea Seafood Gumbo Shoppe – Case Analysis
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Everyone in the seafood industry could be described as a competitor for the Azalea Company. The competitors are trying to get the competitive advantage by creating the biggest number of ccounts (larger market share) with customers and getting the best shelf locations in the stores. However, in the same product line the Azalea Seafood Gumbo product does not have a real competitor because of the good taste which comes from long tradition and only few producers of gumbo which were not TABLE to stay on the market for a longer period of time.

The competition from suppliers of substitutes is relatively weak because these su bstitutes (as for example raw fish or shrimps) are more time consuming and require other ingredients to prepare. Also if we look at the picture 3 in he appendix section, we can see that the consumption of substitutes has increased by only lb per person during the years 1990 and 2000. The competitive threat of new entry is also relatively weak. The new production capacities which would come with new producers would not be sufficiently used because the already existing producers have a lot of free capacities (in case of Azalea Company it is more than 30 %).

Another factor that is not influencing the market situation of the Azalea Company very markedly are suppliers. Their bargaining power is weak because the seafood products are ommodities which are availTABLE from several suppliers on the market (the Azalea Company is purchasing from California rather from nearby Gulf Coast also because Of better prices). One of the most important competitive forces is the power of food service companies, food products brokers and supermarket chains.

These three institutions are TABLE to increase the sales of the Azalea in very high volumes which would not be possible to sell to individual customers and therefore they are very important. Of course they know how important is their position for the seafood producers and therefore this competitive force is so strong. Problems The Company has in the year 2000 faced several important problems. They have lost an important customer Oitney-Jungle worth of $1 00,000 sales) and because of production problems they have recalled products for another $100,000.

As a consequence the company has lost the eighth biggest supermarket chain in the US – Publix. The Company has constantly problems with the marketing activities. Insufficient attention of the food brokers and unfavorTABLE product placement in the distribution networks lowers the sales. The Company facilities are not enough big to increase the production for arger customers or to get certificates allowing new product lines. The management (Addison and Rathle) Was unTABLE to get contracts with larger restaurants chains.

From the last two ratios mentioned in the TABLE above we can assume that the Azalea Company needs to increase its ability to change assets into cash (below industry average of 1. 2) (Investors. reuters. com, 2006) and its ability to turnover the inventory more times during one year period (below industry average of 6. 42) (Investors. reuters. com, 2006). All financial results in the 1998 are strongly influenced by the increased demo costs which have misrepresented their interpretation value.

SWOT analysis StrengthsWeaknesses – Better product quality relative to rivals – Award winning product – Superior intellectual capital relative to key rivals (know-how resulting from long-year trad ition) – Azalea’s representation in the Wal-Mart Supercenters – No clear strategic direction Weak brand image or reputation in the global market – Weak dealer network and lack of adequate global distribution capabilities – Lots of underutilized plant capacity – Missing R& D strategy – Missing Marketing strategy OpportunitiesThreats – Getting new customers groups or expanding into new geographic markets or product segments – Expanding the product line to meet a broader range of customers – Using the Internet and e-commerce to increase sales opportunities – Alliances or joint ventures that expand the firm’s market coverage or boost its competitive capability – Entry of a new competitor – Increasing competition in the industry Costly new regulatory requirements – Bargaining power Of Customers or suppliers – A shift in buyer needs away from the product Evaluation of possible solutions SOLUTION 1 : Specialization of the two partners plus employ a new employee with good marketing skills can decrease production costs and increase sales.

The reason behind this is that both partners were sharing responsibility in the production process as well as in the company’s sales and marketing activities. If Adison would take the responsibility for marketing and Rathle for production both Of them can more concentrate on their fields and improve he results of their work. Because the marketing activities are more important for the company’s sales Adison should employ a new employee with good marketing skills. His position should partially compensate non-functional collaboration with food brokers and on the other side increase the number of new customers and keep better product placement in the shelves. The biggest negatives of this solution are increased costs for payments for the new employee.

However, it is predicTABLE that if this employee would be TABLE to get new contracts those would produce more money than his salary and other operational costs. SOLUTION 2: More people in the marketing section means more time for the improving of the food broker’s strategy. The brokers play an important part in the company’s sales and therefore few Of them need to be “caught” to the Azalea side. Only by increased attention towards food brokers the company can increase broker’s attention towards Azaleas products. This solution is very time consuming but the results can bring more success than individual attention to each customer. SOLUTION 3: As proposed in the first solution Rathle would have now more time for concentration on the production process.

Its first decisions should ead towards an increase of finished goods and decrease of the raw materials in the inventory. This step is necessary in order to satisfy jobbers which can play also an important part in company’s sales and in increasing the inventory turnover which is very low. Of course this step brings more pressure on the just in time delivery management of the raw materials and more precise production planning. It can have also a negative impact on the supplier’s prices. SOLUTION 4: Azalea Seafood Gumbo Shoppe products had a sTABLE price for the last two years. A 10 % price increase for the whole product line would be ccepTABLE by the market and it would dramatically change the net income of the company.

If we look at the picture 1 and 2 in the appendix section we can observe a constant increase in the demand for the seafood products which is bigger than supply and constantly increasing consumption of the seafood products. The 10 % increase is not so dramatic if we take into account the inflation rate in the years 1 999 and 2000 which was together 5,6 % (GPEC Information Center, 2005) good know-how of the company and weak competition in the gumbo product line. Of course each increase in the product price can cause change in the customer preferences. Orientation towards substitutes (raw fish, shrimps and others) is excluded as it was described in the competitive forces section (picture 3 in the appendix section).

The only threat of this solution is orientation on ordinary customers (not restaurants) towards other products availTABLE in the supermarket chains. SOLUTION 5: More attractive product covers are necessary in order to get not only customer attention but also better product placement on the shelves. If we look at the quart packaging for the gumbo we can assume that the cover is very old fashioned and not attractive for the eyes of the customer as well as for the sellers. The new cover should include more graphics and colors and should increase the customer relationship towards Azaleas products. Not only the cover but also the inside of the gumbo product should be innovated.

Rathle idea about boxes with gumbo and rice inside is very accurate and necessary at the same time. If we look at the picture 4 in the appendix section, we can see that Rathle’s idea become five years later reality. This solution will increase the cost of containers entry in the IS and also create a new entry in the expenses section of the IS. However this solution would also increase the company’s amount of sales. SOLUTION 6: One of the most difficult possible solutions for the Azalea Seafood Gumbo Shoppe is the idea of new facility vs. rebuilding. The advantage of a new facility would increase production capacities and more attractive company profile in front of the biggest customers.

The disadvantage is represented in the money needed for the new equipment (more than $1 00,000) and increased rent. The argument of increased production capacity is until now very weak because the production has still more than 30 % of capacities free, however if bigger customer would be attracted then the production would be overloaded. Another possibility is to rebuild the existing facilities in order to enlarge them. How realistic is the first or second possibility depends on number of big customers. SOLUTION 7: In the year 2000 it is already more than necessary to create a new section in the company responsible for the internet and e-commerce activities.

Few years later this section will be not only the main communication channel with big and small customers but also a way how to attract and increase the sales, decrease expenses and attract new customers. Investments needed for the technology will have a high return value. This olution does not have a disadvantage or negative effect for the company. Recommendations Based on the presented statistical data and analysis in the section above we would recommend all solutions except solution number six to be included in the new plan of action for the Azalea Seafood Gumbo Shoppe. Short term plans (realized during less than 1 year period): SOLUTION 1 : Specialization of the two partners plus employing a new employee.

Cite this Azalea Seafood Gumbo Shoppe – Case Analysis Essay

Azalea Seafood Gumbo Shoppe – Case Analysis Essay. (2018, Feb 03). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/essay-azalea-seafood-gumbo-shoppe-case-analysis/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page