Get help now

The Use of Richness in Love’s Literary Ethics

  • Pages 2
  • Words 390
  • Views 173
  • dovnload

    Download

    Cite

  • Pages 2
  • Words 390
  • Views 173
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    Heather Love starts her essay, “That there is perhaps no term that carries more value in the humanities than ‘rich’. In literary studies, especially, richness is an undisputed – if largely uninterrogated good…”. She uses the word rich and richness multiple times since it is connected with interpreting and deep reading, but the critic loses richness, when he practices surface reading.

    Love asserts at the beginning of her essay, “richness signifies qualities associated with the complexity polyvalence of texts and with the warmth and depth of experience” . One of the definitions of richness is, according to the OED, “Abundance of some good constituent; lushness; depth, fullness” (“richness”). She acknowledges that texts, which exhibit depth and fundamental principles, have intrinsic value. The texts that are associated with richness usually have multiple meanings and are open to a number of different interpretations, yet the texts should also exhibit human experience. There is a whole science around the richness of a text, called hermeneutics, which means “The study or analysis of how texts, utterances, or actions are interpreted” (“hermeneutics”). Different methods of evaluation the depth of a text have been applied.

    The “hermeneutic activity –the practice of close reading”  is what Love evaluates next. The practice of close reading became the framework of hermeneutics in the early 20th century and has been the foundation of text evaluation since then, no matter what different literary approaches and cultural changes were present, since “the richness of texts continues to serve as a carrier for an allegedly superannuated humanism”. Her own assertion regarding the interpretation of texts can be interpreted in sevemerge with the use of scientific sociologic methods. However, one method does not have to exclude the other method, as Love seems suggest with her ending sentence, “who among us is willing to exchange the fat and the living for the thin and dead?” . Descriptive reading could enhance close reading. Description leads to interpretation and is part of richness.

    Works Cited

    1. Douglass, Frederick, and David W. Blight. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave: With Related Documents. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2003. Print.
    2. “hermeneutics, n.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2014. Web. 30 April 2014.
    3. Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn.” New Literary History 41.2 (2010): 371-91. Project Muse. Web. 30 April 2014.
    4. “richness, n.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2014. Web. 1 May 2014.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    The Use of Richness in Love’s Literary Ethics. (2018, Feb 04). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/essay-closebut-not-deep-the-use-of-richness-in-loves-literary-ethics-and-the-descriptive-turn/

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy