What is a Crime? A crime is an offence against the public law. It is an act committed or omitted in violation of a law forbidding or commanding it and for which punishment is imposed upon conviction. Crimes violate the law and order of a society and it negatively affects the social structure and the society’s fundamental values, morale and belief system. The concept of Crime can vary from society to Society The crimes are events and actions that are proscribed by the criminal law of a particular country (Wilkins 1968) In general, the society and its existing laws define crime.
Sometimes crime in one society may not be seen as an offence n another society. Sometimes acts of crime depend on the socio-cultural values, religious belief systems and political ideology. At times crimes vary to society-to-society. Therefore, crime in one society may not be regarded as a crime in another society. For instance, homosexuality is a punishTABLE offence in Iran and gay people are viewed as criminals. Under the Iranian law, if they found guilty they can be sent to jail. In the western society, gay people have rights and any action that discriminate them can be challenged in the court of law.
Bigamy is an offence in the Western world and those who violate marital awe can be prosecuted. However, in some countries bigamy or polygamy is not an offence and on most occasions treated as a social norm. In countries like Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen etc under the Islamic law polygamy is permitted but under specific conditions. Pedophilia is rejected by most of the contemporary societies and it is considered as a crime. But In the ancient Sparta sexual acts with children were considered as norm and it was widely practiced.
When the prohibition laws were in action in the USA (from 1919 to 1933) the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol were banned nationally. Any people involved in such action were prosecuted. During the Soviet era any person tried to defect to the West were treated as criminals, those who tried to defect were prosecuted under the Soviet law. For instance, Mikhail Barbarianism the famous Soviet ballet dancer defected to Canada in 1974 requesting political asylum. Soon after his defection, the Soviet authorities pronounced him as a criminal.
Similarly, any Soviet citizen who had American Dollars in their possession without an official document were arrested and prosecuted under the Soviet criminal law. But after the Perestroika these laws became ineffective. Although crime can vary from society to society and time to time some crimes such as murder rape, theft etc often remain constant and in many societies and these acts are condemned by the people. Crime defined by various scholars The Greek Philosopher Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC) postulated that poverty is the parent of revolution and crime.
The English Philosopher and the Statesman Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) stated that “Opportunity makes a thief’ Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) believed that Man is naturally good and crime is created by social injustice. The great writer Leo Tolstoy believed hat roots of crime closely connected with private ownership of property. Vladimir Lenin was on the view that crime is a product of social excess. The Psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud highlighted the innate instincts of criminality hidden in the human psyche.
The French sociologist Mile Druthers defined crime as a legal construct resulting from the social obloquy directed at certain forms of behavior (Druthers 1958). Sociological Aspects of Crime Sociological aspects of crime can be divided into broad categories in relation to social determinants. Crime and criminal behavior can be analyzed wrought functionalist, conflict, feminist and postmodern perspectives. Sociological aspects view crime and criminal behavior as socially acquired and hence focus on the ways in which cultural and/or social structural factors are crime prod icing.
Crime under Functionalist Perspective Functionalists focus on the individual, usually with the intent to show how broader social forces mold individual behavior. They underline social cohesion as the key factor of social order. Functionalists like Tailcoat Parsons attempted to integrate all the social sciences into a science of human action. He believed that social system is made up of the actions Of individuals. According to Tailcoat Parsons equilibrium model society consists of network of connected parts. He viewed crime as a disintegrative factor that could affect the homeostasis of the society.
Based on Tailcoat model an individual committing homicide has domino affect and his action reverberates within the society. For instance the murder of Tort” Stafford in 2009 brought horror to her family and created a nation wide anxiety. Druthers viewed crime (deviancy) as being just another function of society. He noted that it forms art of every society, and was therefore a natural occurrence. In fact, he viewed it as fulfilling various important social needs; it acted to unify law abiding citizens against the criminal, thus “crime brings together honest men and concentrates them. Recognition Of crime was a validation of the existence of laws, which were in turn a reinforcement of our central values after all, “we do not condemn [an act] because it is a crime, but it is a crime because we condemn it. ” (Druthers and the philosophy of causation – M. Travis ) The Functionalist Robert Morton observed the colossal social changes during the Great Depression. The crime rate plummeted and Morton focused his attention on the imbalance of power, disproportional distribution of wealth in an era of economic debacle.
Morton in his famous essay, Social Structure and Anomie (1938) largely discusses crime and criminality. Robert Morton described so called manifest and latent functions. Like any other social phenomenon, crime has its manifest and latent functions. Manifest functions are open and conscious; where as latent functions remain unconscious. The Functionalists agree that the society is connected to each other within various systems and thus maintaining an optimal stability. Crime shakes the stability and making the society dysfunctional.
When the crime rate goes up societies become dysfunctional. The 19th century Sicily was shaken by the series of criminal acts that was launched by the Coos Nostril or the Sicilian mafia. The ill effects of crime affected almost all the social layers of the Sicilian society. People lived in fear and tension maintaining a conspiracy of silence. The phenomenon of organized crime in Sicily has survived throughout all political changes and economic transformations that have taken place in Italy in the post war period.
In search of an explanation, omen scholars have blamed the absence of the State; some others have stressed the historically predatory relation between the State and the Southern regions; recently it has been argued that what makes Sicilian organized crime successful is the fact that it sells protection in a market characterized by an endemic lack of trust. (Cotton 2006) Crime and Conflict Perspective Karl Marx believed that ruling class keeps the other classes in a disadvantaged position and Proletariat were always being exploited by the Bourgeoisie.
According to Marxist view, Social injustice and uneven striation of wealth give rise to crime and carcinogenic conditions. Karl Marx s article on Capital Punishment published in the New York Daily Tribune in 1 853 comments on the genesis of crime in the society following economic causes. Although the basic Marxist premise is that crime is a socio- economic phenomenon, the Soviet Union experienced deadly waves of crime from the 1 917 Socialist Revolution. Some of the violent acts were committed by various political fractions like Stephen Bandier group.
The Soviet authorities believed that the elimination of private property in the means of reduction, the eradication of the exploitation of one person by another and the resolution of social antagonisms led to the disappearance of basic social roots of crime in the USSR. Despite their belief, the crimes were prevailing in the Soviet Union and like in the Western societies serial murders emerged under the Socialist system. (the serial murder Andrei Chattily or the Red Ripper of Roosts had killed over 50 children and women) The strict censorship limited the publishing of comprehensive crime statistics in the Soviet union.
Interactions and Crime The sociological theoretical perspective of interactions explains that crime merge as a result of human interaction. Crime is a form of social interaction consisting of actions and reactions. The interactions elucidates crime and how criminals to act within society According to the interactions, everyone has different attitudes, values, culture and beliefs so as criminals. The Interactions Herbert Blamer in his 1933 publication Movies, Delinquency, and Crime explains the media influence on criminal behavior.
The criminals as Herbert Blamer views unTABLE to establish empathy. He further says that in phenomenology (one of the subdivisions of symbolic interactions) empathy plays a greater role. Empathy refers to the experience Of another human body as another. While people often identify others with their physical bodies, this type of phenomenology requires that we focus on the subjectivity of the other, as well as our interconnection engagement with them. The non- empathic factor was apparent in many crimes. For example, people who committed crimes against humanity (Hitler, pool pot etc) lacked empathy.
The psychological profile of the serial murder Charles Jobsharer alias Bikini Killer indicates that he had no violent impulses. Jobsharer had excellent communication skills and his social interaction was tightly connected with a recess of communication. Charles Jobsharer allegedly committed at least 12 murders including a Canadian tourist. The psychological profile also indicate is lack of empathy. Feminist Perspectives and Crime According to the feminist perspective, male domination in society (patriarchy) and gender inequality have an enormous disadvantage to the women.
The feminists argue that often women become the victims of crime rather than the perpetrators. The women are subjected to crimes like rape, abuse, exploitation etc around the globe. As they point out on most occasions, the women perpetrators of crime had no control over their situation and they ere forced to commit these anti social acts following the social injustices created by the male dominated society. The Indian Feminists give a solid example of Poland Devil or the Bandit Queen of India and how she became a criminal.
Poland was forced to marry an elderly man at the age of 1 1 and she underwent mistreatment by her husband and his relatives. Following unbearTABLE domestic abuse, she ran away from her husband. When she came back to her village, the son of the village headman tried to molest her. Although she was the victim Poland was publicly humiliated by high cast lagers and she was banished from her native village. When she returned to her village after a few months, the police unjustly arrested her and a group of policemen raped Poland.
These mental and physical traumas led her to form a bandit group and she unleashed a deadly violence committing murder and robberies in rural India. The American society was shocked by the crimes committed by a female named Aileen Wrongs. Aileen was born in 1956 in Michigan. Her father was a habitual child molester and felon and was imprisoned for rape and attempted murder and committed suicide while in prison. Soon after his death, Allen’s mother left her. She was raised by her grandparents who had no constant income. Aileen Wrongs had a tormented childhood and she entered the society as a misfit.
At the age of 1 5, Aileen ran away and became a petty criminal and a prostitute. While working as a sex worker many times she was brutally raped and she sustained physical injuries. In later years, Aileen Wrongs killed seven men by shooting her victims multiple times and dumping their bodies in remote locations. Aileen Wrongs was arrested for murder and faced a trial. She was executed in Florida in 2002 by a lethal injection. The stories of Poland Devil of the Indian society and Aileen Wrongs Of the North American society evidently show the validity of the arguments presented by feminists on crime.
The Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith in her Standpoint theory suggests that the predominant culture in which all groups exist is not experienced in the same way by all persons or groups. The normalized groups live in the predominant culture must learn to be bicameral or to pass in the dominant culture to survive, even though that perspective is not there own. (Differences 2007) Post Modern Perspective on Crime According to the post Modern perspective, social changes give rise to crime and there is no single theory to explain the genesis of crime.
Postmodernists view that all truth is relative. Under these circumstances, individuals have lost faith in universal belief systems or ‘grand narratives. The contemporary culture is characterized by the parameterization of objective truth. The modern society is exemplify by consumerism and influence by the media. To explain the crime and criminal behavior Postmodernists use critical theory, which is a social theory, oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole. According to Hannah Aren’t, men are not capTABLE of forgiving what they cannot punish, nor of punishing the unforgivTABLE.
On the other hand, Jacques Deride states that we can maintain a legal accusation even when we forgive, Or inversely, We are TABLE not to judge but We can forgive. (Forgiveness and crimes against humanity: a dialogue between Hannah Aren’t and Jacques Deride – Claudia Prone-Moms©s) Michel Faculty in his alluring book Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison examines the social and theoretical mechanisms behind the massive changes that occurred in western penal systems during the modern age. Several centuries ago, criminals were punished in public to discourage committing crimes.
According to Michel Faculty, the public spectacle of torture was a theatrical forum that served several intended and unintended purposes for society. Based on Faculty’s argument reflecting the violence of the original crime onto the convicts body for all to see remained as the main purpose. In the modernist approach, Crime is a multicultural phenomenon and some postmodernists try to explain the crime and criminal behavior via Chaos theory. Based on the common notion murders and the rapes as the manifestations of crime, but in reality they are the consequences of other social occurrences.
Chaos Theory holds that it is virtually impossible to predict the outcome of any social phenomenon because social events are susceptible to change. In the postmodern condition, life is in fragments and people experience everyday life as an open space of moral, political and personal dilemmas. Conclusion The concept of Crime can vary from society to Society. Sociological aspects of crime can be divided into broad categories in relation to social determinants. In the sociological perspective, crime and criminal behavior is viewed in faint standpoints.
According to the functionalist perspective, the society is interlinked with various systems and crimes make the society dysfunctional. The conflict theorists believe that social exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth trigger criminality in the society. The sociological theoretical perspective of interactions explains that crime emerge as a result of human interaction. The feminists argue that often women become the victims of crime rather than the perpetrators. The post Modern perspective explains that social changes give rise to crime and there is no single theory to explain the genesis of crime.
