Group Work Essay
I love working in groups because they give you a chance to work together with new personalities and new, refreshing ideas. The only time I don’t like working in groups is when there are people who aren”t willing to put the effort they could and posses, into the work assigned. I used to believe that I operated very well in groups, but during this year, I found out that I have a few faults that need correcting, and am in the process of re-evaluating my values and myself.
It seems that I tend to take control of projects and direct them to the direction of my desire. I did not think that I was so controlling until this was brought to my attention by one of my teachers, who said that I was a “strong personality, who knows what he wants, and gets irritated when it doesn”t go the way he pictures it”. Of course, this was hard to digest and I just denied it at first, but when I went home and thought about my ignorant actions, I realized that I was a very extroverted-introvert type person.
I also realized that I would like to be the backbone of the group and take in suggestions from all the members instead of always making my own. I plan to, from now on, listen to all contributions and encourage all members to speak their mind. To be the anchor, the link that holds the group together, is more important than getting my ideas in to an extend that it oppresses other ideas. At a time in my life where I am re-evaluating myself, it is hard to keep up my previous self-confidence, and therefore. am still adjusting to being a follower at times as well.
I think that the groups I worked in had trouble functioning because some members were not willing to work while others were forcing them to. Perhaps the ones that weren”t willing to contribute would have been more comfortable working with their own ideas. Perhaps they would have worked easily if they liked what they were working on and weren”t simply being forced to do dull and tedious tasks of no interest to them. To gently coax such people into coming together and building on the strengths, complimenting the bonds of the group, is my focus at the moment whenever in a group.
Group Work Essay
Introduction What is group work and what is it? Group work is usually a group of up to four or six students. Each group is set to work together either by their tutors or self-selecting. Group work is for various learning purposes either set by tutors or students. It gives students the opportunity to share ideas, resources, and ability. Group work gives opportunities for students to get to know each other and form working relationships to gain and achieve a better understanding of particular group assignment work that can develop their skills, such as communication, listening, and team working skills.
The motive of group work is to improve both the learning achievement and learning efficiency of individual students by keeping learning active, helping students to develop their critical thinking, progress their greater responsibility for their learning. Moses, John and Bell, Bob (1995 p88) suggested that group work allows students and each individual to “recognise each others strengths and weakness. ” Why work in a group?
Jaques, D (1991, p9) said, “Teaching and learning in small groups has a valuable part to play in the all-round education of students. It allows them to negotiate meanings, to express themselves in the language of the subject, and to establish a more intimate contact with academic staff than more formal methods permit. ” In other words, group work can be very exciting and fun to engage in activities, it is design to reduce the workload and give students the opportunity to share their workload rather than the doing it all alone.
There are many aims and reasons for working in a group, one of the aims is to emphasise on the topic or assignment set, to give students the opportunity to discuss their views and be able to share their own experiences, beliefs, and what is valued to them. Group work is a valuable method of learning because goals are set to accomplish. With fair tasks divided amongst them, support from one another with decision-making, ideas, and communication. People can learn to agree and disagree in groups; they can expand their critical thinking, creative knowledge and form independent decision.
The advantage and disadvantage of group work The advantages in a group task are that students are set to carry out responsibilities to achieve their work. In a group, everyone gets to learn not just from the tutor but also from other students to give everyone the opportunity to share and discuss their work for support and feedback to avoid disagreements and disappointments before meeting the deadline. The disadvantages can be when each individual feels that they have been set with tasks that are more difficult or when individuals do not pull their own weight to research and learn.
When members of the group do not stay on track and are just passengers that do not stay around or bully other team members, it does not only intimidate the person but puts the group under pressure and make the group work harder to accomplish. Problems in the group Problems in the group can be very common and should be dealt within the group. Even though common problems are usually dealt amongst the group as mature students sometimes the lack of communication and understanding can lead to an uncomfortable working group and low insignificant marks.
Therefore, it is important that in a group students know how to put aside feelings and differences that they may have against each other so they can concentrate on the work set and the reason for the work being set. Tutors do not get involved in common, problems but it has been known that in rare cases when the students are no longer being professional regarding their work and are putting other students’ life at risk tutors then have to take certain measures to prevent the problem from going further.
Brown, Sally (March 12 1999. ) Other common problems depend on the type of group, each individual’s background, critical thinking, beliefs, behaviour, attitude and so on. Conclusion The conclusion of this research is that “Learning in groups, rather than lectures or presentations, allows students to have greater scope to negotiate meaning and express themselves and their own ideas. It also helps them to establish far more effective relationships, not only with their tutors and trainers but with each other. (Routledge, 21st Decemeber2006. ) Making group work an effective way of learning. To help students understand the reason of the group work exercise and the different roles that group members can have by their strength and weakness. The conclusion is that group work does not only provide students with effective and collaborative learning abilities but also the knowledge and preparation of real job employment requirements needed in every job.
This assignment will describe a piece of group work, which I have been involved in during the course of my 70-day placement. The assignment will analyse the effectiveness of the group work with reference to group work theories. The group in which I have developed is a health and fitness group for adults with learning difficulties, who live within residential services. Participation in this group gives the members a chance to socialise whilst learning new activities and information about health.
Merchant (1988) argues that developing as a worker in a group is inadequate, upholding that practitioners also need to be proficient members of teams. This involves understanding the progression that operates in groups and dexterity in facilitating group relationships and tasks in order to achieve objectives. Groups offer a diverse level of interaction, facilitating learning on a level that is not available through individual methods. Being part of a group can offer a sense of belonging and gives members a chance to aid others in their development as well as be aided themselves.
For some, a group is a place to belong, where mutual support, inspiration and trust are offered. (Coulshed and Orme, 2006). The purpose of the group I worked with is to offer people with learning difficulties, in residential services, the chance to experience various forms of exercise and learn about healthy lifestyle choices. It aims to provide opportunities for members to develop positive relationships, enabling them to make friends and have fun. Cole and Llyod (2007) emphasise the prevailing capability group work has to engage marginalised populations.
Adults with learning difficulties are particularly at risk of being socially excluded. According to a national survey cited in Valuing People Now (Department of Health, 2007), 31% of people with learning difficulties have no friends. The paper goes on to suggest that organising service provision to include integration is one way that can contribute to people’s social contacts. I was given the task of starting the group, along with another member of staff who is a senior support worker in one of the residential houses.
There are also three other senior support workers who are charged with responsibility for facilitating the group. The members who attend the group are accompanied by staff members from their individual houses. All of the people living within residential services were invited to the first session, which totalled almost 50 people. However, it was thought to be unlikely that everybody would attend as some people may have other commitments.
The size of a group is very important in terms of group dynamics and should be large enough for stimulation, yet small enough for contribution and acknowledgment of each member (Brown 1992). At the first meeting, eight service users attended. Although this was a good number as it allowed people to get to know each other and spend time speaking to everyone in the group, we had facilities to accommodate 20 people comfortably and were a little disappointed at the low turn out. The members of the group have differing levels of learning difficulties and are a mixture of both men and women.
When a group is being set up, if possible a perfect equilibrium, is one that is standardised enough to ensure solidity and assorted enough to ensure validity”. (Coulshed and Orme, 2006) The venue for the sessions is a recreation centre within the Tameside area, it was important when finding a suitable accommodation, that it be wheelchair accessible and have appropriate disabled toilets, to accommodate people with physical disabilities. As we asked members to contribute to the cost of room hire, it was also imperative that we found a venue at a reasonable price.
Four main stages of group development have been identified as playing a part in groups, these are forming, storming, norming, and performing (Tuckman and Jenson, 1977) and I will discuss these in relation to the group work I undertook. The initial session involved the group meeting each other for the first time, to begin with the members seemed hesitant about what would take place at the sessions and what was expected of them. Tuckman identified this stage as the forming stage, this phase is characterised by anxiety from the participants.
At this point, individuals are gathering information and impressions about each other, and about the scope of the task and how to approach it. (Tuckman and Jenson, 1977). With this in mind, I introduced myself to the group, illuminating that I was a student social worker on placement and that I would only be part of the group for a month. I explained that I would be facilitating the group and organising various fitness activities. Also, along with the other group leaders, I would inform members about healthy lifestyle choices and give them tips on how to incorporate changes into their lives.
The first activity was a warm-up using a parachute, which everybody had the chance to participate in. The game involved each person holding a part of the parachute, then as a team, we would move the parachute in different directions. Two members decided not to join in at the start of the game, preferring to sit and watch. As the warm-up proceeded one member of the group became very bossy, ordering the other group members to hold the parachute in different ways, some of the participants stayed quiet and one decided to ignore the rules of the game and sat on the floor.
According to Tuckman and Jenson (1977) this is known as the storming stage; decisions don’t come easily within the group, members vie for position as they attempt to establish themselves in relation to other team members and the leader. Clarity of purpose increases but plenty of uncertainties persist. Cliques and factions form and there may be power struggles. The team needs to be focused on its goals to avoid becoming distracted by relationships and emotional issues. Compromises may be required to enable progress.
Aware of this, we moved on to the main activities, which involved a selection of games, including, tennis, curling and boccia and hockey. Having a selection of activities ensured that there would be something that everybody enjoyed. Once the main activities were up and running, this saw the group appearing as unified, working as a team and sharing equipment. This is known as the norming stage, whereas, agreement and consensus is largely formed among the group, they respond well to facilitation by leader and roles and responsibilities are clear and accepted.
As more time was spent doing the activities, it became apparent that boccia was the most popular game, it is accessible for both people with a physical disability and those that are able-bodied. A white jack is thrown and the game involves getting your balls as close to the jack as possible. After about 20 minutes, the whole group were playing boccia and taking it in turns to have their go. The members were laughing and there was a definite sense of team. This is known as the performing stage of Tuckmans model, at this point the group knows clearly why it is doing what it is doing.
There is a shared vision and the group is able to stand on its own feet with no interference or participation from the leader. Disagreements occur but now they are resolved within the group positively and emphasis is placed on working towards achieving the goal. The stages are not inevitably clear-cut; they are more a representation of tendencies which many groups veer towards. Groups are often forming and changing, and each time that happens, they can move to a different Tuckman Stage. A group might be norming or performing, but a new member might force them back into storming.
An experienced leader will be ready for this, and will help the group get back to performing as quickly as possible (Egolf, 2001) At the end of the first session, we spent time asking the group members what activities they enjoyed and if they had any suggestions for what they would like to do in future sessions. This was to ensure that subsequent group meetings stayed fun for members and that they felt involved with the organisation of the group. Many of the participants offered ideas for future activities, ranging from walking to ball sports. One member was very keen to be part of the organisation of the group.
It was important that I facilitated discussions on a level that all members could understand, ensuring that everybody was invited to participate, the aim being to support and empower the members, by adopting an anti-oppressive approach, enabling participants to take greater control and be actively involved in the decision making. On reflection, the first health and fitness session went well; members engaged enthusiastically in activities and spent time socialising with one another. The overall evaluation from the participants of the first session was very favourable.