King Lear: Family Relationships, Human Nature and Its Failings

Table of Content

“I love your stateliness harmonizing to my bond ; no more nor less” ( I. i. 94-95 ) . Good forenoon instructors and HSC pupils. King Lear. a dateless narrative of household relationships. human nature and its weaknesss. But what makes this drama “timeless” ? The fact that it contains cosmopolitan subjects of love. green-eyed monster and household relationships makes it applicable to modern times even though it was written for a 16thcentury audience.

Two critics that have commented on the thematic concerns of household relationships and human nature are Maggie Tomlinson in “A violent world” and Jim Young in “Still through the hawthorn blows the cold wind” . both of which I’ll be discoursing. today in item. The construct of household relationships is a prevailing subject that can be viewed on many degrees. such as the impairment. reclamation and the nature of familial bonds. There are many household relationships in the secret plan of King Lear. with the two major 1s associating to the bomber secret plan of Gloucester and the chief secret plan of Lear.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

In both these relationships. treachery is the major factor that contributes to the impairment of the affinity. In Gloucester’s instance. through the simple act of mortifying Edmund. where Gloucester says in his presence “There was good athletics at his devising and the bastard must be acknowledged” ( 1. 1. 21-24 ) . he created a rift in the relationship. Maggie Tomlinson brings up a instead important point when she remarks on the nature of the relationship and the trust that is abused.

She states “The grounds is merely non the kind of thing any one Lashkar-e-Taiba alone a male parent would believe in” This illustrates the trust that is built in these types of relationships and the ability of it to be exploited. Family relationships are besides seen between the girls and King Lear. Shakespeare smartly investigates the nature of relationships through Lear’s trial to see who loves him the most.

Goneril and Regan are portrayed as manipulative people with the gift of words and courtly manners. but it can be noted that Cordelia besides loves her male parent but can non show it where she says “I am certain my love’s more heavy than my tongue” ( I. i. 76-78 ) . With the absence of a maternal figure. one could oppugn how much Lear love’s. allow entirely. knows about his girl. The fact that he banishes Cordelia. when she can non show her love. shows the small cognition he has of her failings and strengths or the province of his head. After give uping his power. Lear demands love from his girls Goneril and Regan. but does non have. so he begins to plead.

Jim Young remarks on this deteriorating relationship. where Lear’s position is that his girls owe him love because of the stuff gifts he has given them ”Thy half of the land 1000 hast non bury. where in I thee endowed” ( II. four. 177-181 ) . This emphasises the duties of the forced relationship alternatively of its natural happening. Another facet that is profoundly investigated in King Lear is human nature and its weaknesss. To specify human nature it is the properties of world that are assumed to be shared by all human existences. doing it a dateless subject.

To be human is to blame and to larn from one’s errors. Temptation is a nucleus facet that causes these mistakes and is portion of human nature. Throughout the drama. enticement can be seen particularly through that of Lear. Its human nature to experience love but one of Lear’s defect is his pride. he wants to be praised. hear how much he is loved. But this defect in his nature of enticement causes his ruin and the loss of his saneness. In his confusion. he becomes metaphorically unsighted. It is merely during the storm that he receives his ain trial. where things might alter or discontinue.

It is in this storm that he goes back to nature as a cardinal being. where the lone thing that distinguished him from an animate being. was stripped. that is the ability to believe and ground. Here. he is stripped of all apparels. and therefore self-respect showing the weakness of 1s nature. Young goes on to state that Lear merely becomes sane because of those around him particularly the Fool. The Fool bases by with Lear and portions his in agonies but is specific about one point: “Never give your power to anyone” .

It is human nature to desire power and regard. and when Lear gives it off. as seen through the losing of his knights. he himself becomes a sap. Last. Shakespeare besides investigates human nature’s connexion to salvation in Edmond. Edmond seeks salvation before he dies. where decease is the redemptional justness. Knowing that he was non to populate. he tried to alter his evil nature by advising others to travel and salvage Cordelia from his homicidal courier. but as Maggie Tomlinson said. Shakespeare smartly incorporates the efforts of a individual to alter their nature.

Here. Edmond fails and is responsible for Cordelia’s decease. Tomlinson brings up the inquiry if whether this shows that we can try to alter. but it is our human nature to be conservative and non brood into unfamiliar district. and therefore Edmond attempts to make good by salvaging Cordelia but merely fails. King Lear will go on to stay a dateless narrative. and enlighten audiences about household relationships and human nature. for old ages to come. One could merely inquire if those in Shakespeare’s clip appreciated the drama. the sum it is appreciated now. Thank you.

Cite this page

King Lear: Family Relationships, Human Nature and Its Failings. (2017, Sep 02). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront