1. What is the relationship between the rubric of the essay and its content? Interpret the rubric and explicate what it means to you. Make you see the rubric capturing? The relationship between the rubric and the context is the author’s narrative of depicting the battles to be understanding towards her hubby refering his Muslim religion. Bremer’s hubby tells her that harmonizing to the Prophet Mohammad the greatest Jihad. or battle. of our lives is one that takes topographic point in our Black Marias and is a battle to go a better individual. Bremer finds herself in a battle to be less focussed on her demands and more tolerant towards her husband’s spiritual beliefs during the month of Ramadan. hence the rubric My Accidental Jihad. I think the negative intension environing the word Jihad. combined with inadvertent. makes the rubric highly capturing. It makes the reader ask “How can one accidently want to blow themselves up? ”
2. What is the importance of paragraph 3? Would the essay be merely as clear to the mean reader if the paragraph had been left out? Explain your reply. Paragraph 3 is of import because it explains some history about Ramadan and besides what takes topographic point during the month. I don’t believe the essay would hold been as clear had the paragraph been left out. I think it gives the reader a sense of the deepness of the fast. It shows it’s non merely a fast from nutrient.
3. What contrast is drawn between paragraph 7 and 8? Which authorship technique contributes to the color of the paragraphs? How convincing are the author’s statements? Do you believe her feelings are justified in both paragraphs? Explain your reply. I think the contrast between the two paragraphs is that Paragraph 7 is lively and Bremer is vivid in depicting their new love and besides in coming to the realisation that Ismail had all the qualities of the adult male she wanted to get married. In paragraph 8 she changes the tone to depict how during Ramadan their relationship becomes bland and how Ismail’s God is ubiquitous and austere. Bremer uses specific inside informations and besides centripetal inside informations to lend to the color of the paragraphs. I think her statements are converting in that she gets her point across in both paragraphs. I think her feelings are justified in that they are her feelings. In paragraph 8 she is holding a difficult clip maintaining sight of the qualities she found in him from paragraph 7.
4. What facet of Ramadan does the writer emphasize in paragraphs 10 and 11? How does she portray the world that accompanies intensified fasting and praying? What is her position of these rites? Bremer emphasizes the fasting from nutrient and the resulting effects that has on her husband’s energy. Bremer portrays her hubby as being lifeless. humorless. and unable to keep conversation and merely overall drained from the effects of his fasting. She seems frustrated by the rites. inquiring him sardonically what he’s learned from his fast so far.
5. How does the writer conclude her essay? Is the inquiry the writer asks her hubby carnival or unfair? Do you believe she truly uses an guiltless tone when she asks her inquiry? What is her intent in inquiring the inquiry? She ends the essay by explicating her realisation that during Ramadan she was being self-involved and that she now has a better apprehension of what love means to her. I thought her tone was sardonically guiltless at best. She was frustrated at the clip she asked it. so clearly she was non trying to acquire an existent reply. She wanted him to oppugn his fast.