We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Plato vs Aristotle

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Regime Change We have two great philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. These

are great men, whose ideas have not been forgotten over years. Although

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Plato vs Aristotle
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

their thoughts of politics were similar, we find some discrepancies in their

teachings. The ideas stem from Socrates to Plato to Aristotle. Plato based

moral knowledge on abstract reason, while Aristotle grounded it on

experience and tried to apply it more to concrete living. Both ways of life are

well respected by many people today. Plato started his teachings in

remembrance of his good friend, Socrates.

After his death he traveled back

to Italy and studied under Pythagoras. Some years later he began “The

Academy”. Much of the curriculum taught was dedicated to the teachings of

Socrates. During this time he began to write down his thoughts about politics

and development of a regime. Developing different aspects than Socrates’.

The Republic is the most important dialogue within Plato’s teaching of

politics. It deals with the soul, which, as we know from the beginning, at the

level where one must make choices and decide what one wants to become in

this life, and it describes justice as the ultimate form of human, and the ideal

one should strive for both in life and in state.

Justice as understood by Plato is

not merely a social virtue, having only to do with relationship between people,

but virtue that makes it possible for one to build their own regime and reach

happiness. The Republic is a political, and a work dealing with what traits or

virtues one must have, as its whole purpose is to show that the one cannot be

separated from the other. Politics is nothing more than the attempts of man to

put order or disorder in his social life or regime. There is no way people can

bring order in their social life if one does not first put order in their life,

nobody is able to lead others unless one first leads oneself. People’s soul are

made up of several parts, as will be shown along the way, each man’s main

concern and occupation in life should be to build harmony and unity. Politics

is the way a person expresses how his or her order in life can be used for

everyone, the image of their own inner order or disorder reflected in his social

life. A person cannot live alone, because one is a social animal, one must act;

politics becomes an important part of the mind. Politics are simply the means

of bringing order into the world of men through laws that are the product of

rational nature. It is the ultimate concern of the philosopher, the one of

wisdom, to bring this order forward. Aristotle at the age of 17 attended “The

Academy” founded by Plato. Recall that “The Academy” had been set up

using the principles that were later set out in Plato’s major work, The

Republic. Aristotle continued at “The Academy” until the death of Plato some

twenty years later. Aristotle was recognized as a brilliant independent student

of philosophy. Aristotle’s view of politics is expressed in his writing, Politics.

Rather than focusing on the individual Aristotle is more intent on the regime,

and the highest goal, justice. Another main point is that people must live

together, thus having a united regime. The family unit was highly respected,

for the household is where people originate. Aristotle’s political science

encompasses the two fields that modern philosophers distinguish as ethics

and political philosophy. Political philosophy in the sense is roughly speaking

the subject of his literature called the Politics. The most important task for the

politician is, in the role of lawgiver, to frame the appropriate constitution for

the regime. Aristotle defines the constitution as a certain ordering of the

inhabitants of the city-state. Once the constitution is in place, the politician

needs to take the appropriate measures to maintain it, to introduce reforms

when he finds them necessary, and to prevent developments that might pose

threats to the political system. This involves enduring laws, customs, and

institutions for the citizens. Aristotle sees that every regime is a sort of

community, and that every community is established for the sake of some

good. Aristotle had different views about he appropriate leader or leaders to

run a Regime. Aristotle thought that one ruler kingship would most benefit the

regime. The order after that goes Aristocracy, Polity, Democracy, Oligarchy,

and finally Tyranny. Plato saw it the order should start with the rule of the

most virtuous, or honor, called a Timocracy. Plato did not define as many

different regimes, after Timocracy, he saw Oligarchy as the next best,

Democracy, and Tyranny. For actual regime change, Plato sees that there is

no possible way of bettering a regime. Things will always be deteriorating

rather then being able to amend itself. He views change within a regime as a

linear uncontrollable circumstance. It all begins with the corruption of the

people. Aristotle on the other hand views this matter much different, almost

opposite of Plato. Aristotle’s understanding of the regime is one that is

non-linear, and can go from better to worse and also worse to better. He

comprehends the possibility of a regime rehabilitating itself. Rather than the

people’s corruption causing the downfall, it is the natural division of the

people, classes. Also forms of justice and injustice result in the dissolving of a

regime. The understanding of Plato’s regime is one that involves both the self

and the regime. Aristotle on the other hand shows that development of state

can be achieved without being the most wise. He also looks upon the regime

with a positive regard rather that the pessimistic view of Plato, that things will

always get worse. Aristotle understands that the coming together of people

with common interest will always yield a city, and then onto a regime. Plato

takes the planned out way, making sure that everything is in order before the

regime or city can be formed. Both ideals of a regime are ones that would

yield strong frivolous and successful places of habitation, yet we have never

had a chance to see them in today’s world. If only now we could see how

Cite this Plato vs Aristotle

Plato vs Aristotle. (2018, Aug 25). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/plato-vs-aristotle-essay/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page