, Research Paper
Student Athletes Deserve More than Scholarships:
A Look into the Fundss of Major College Sports Programs
Student-athletes at major Division I-A colleges and universities do more than attend categories, patterns, and vie against other squads. They generate gross. Intercollegiate athleticss have developed into a extremely specialised, multi-million dollar amusement industry that rides on the shoulders of student-athletes. This industry has in bend resulted in significant wagess for large clip athletic plans and the NCAA. Harmonizing to an NCAA study conducted in 1998, 67 per centum of Division I-A football plans showed an mean net income of $ 3.9 million with many of the largest plans far transcending that figure ( Netzley ) . Add in gross from other athleticss and the NCAA took in $ 267 million in 1997-1998 ( NCAA ) .
Universities do non conceal the importance they place on successful athleticss plans. In 1997, Steve Spurrier, caput football manager at the University of Florida, signed a six-year contract that averaged $ 2 million per twelvemonth. In add-on to his $ 2 million one-year wage, Spurrier was given two new autos, a generous vesture allowance and 24 premier tickets for each Gators place game. The trade besides included inducements that would take consequence when specific ends set Forth in the contract are achieved ( Martinez ) . He can gain $ 99,000 for winning another national title. He can gain the equivalent of one month of his base wage for acquiring to the SEC title game, two months tantamount for any bowl game, two-and-a-half months for an Alliance bowl game, and in conclusion, $ 50,000 for winning a 3rd national title ( Martinez ) . Jeremy Foley, University of Florida Athletic Director, said after the sign language, ? Obviously, people are traveling to speak about the sum of money he? s devising, but he adds enormous value to this university? ( Martinez ) .
While universities are eager to counterbalance managers for the feats of their participants they are steadfast in their conformity of the NCAA Manual. Article 12 of the NCAA bylaws provides that? a student-athlete loses recreational position along with the right to take part in intercollegiate sports when he is found to hold received financess, awards, or other impermissible benefits established under NCAA statute law? ( NCAA ) . These prohibitions on payment include direct compensation for athletic engagement and reception of fiscal assistance above the cost of tuition, fees, room, board, and books ( NCAA ) .
While student-athletes straight contribute 1000000s of dollars in gross to establishments they receive nil but the bare minimal cost to maintain them in school. Most of these immature work forces and adult females come from lower-middle category and low-class households that are unable to direct them passing money during the twelvemonth or wage for a plane ticket place for the vacations ( Martinez ) . The NCAA forbids student-athletes from working for rewards during the school twelvemonth ( NCAA ) . If parents are unable to direct their boy or girl money for anything non covered by their scholarship they are hard up.
The solution to the money job is simple: pay them. I am non speaking about 1000000s or even 1000s of dollars. Give each student-athlete the same sum of wage based on the entire gross dollars their several athletics generates countrywide. The pay would be the same for every jock based on division withi
n the same athletics. For illustration, Division I-A, the largest and most competitory division in college sports, might pay each football participant $ 2500 per season. Every football participant in that division would have the same sum regardless of on field part. Having every school abide by equal wage would extinguish larger, more profitable schools from offering bigger paydays to recruits as inducement to go to their establishment over another. This would maintain enrolling just across the state for every school.
Student-athletes endure countless hours of pattern and athletic competition to gain pride, regard, and most significantly, money for their several schools. Unfortunately, these jocks are taken out of the equation when it comes clip to administer the gross generated by their athletic plans. Of the $ 267 million in gross made by the NCAA in 1998, over 85 per centum, or $ 228 million, were returned in dollars to the athletic plans yet none of this money goes to the jocks themselves ( NCAA ) . The clip has come for these pupils to be compensated.
Paying participants would make more than let the underprivileged pupils to take part in basic college activities like dating or telling a pizza with friends. It would relieve many other jobs as good. Gambling and corruptness on campuses is endangering the unity of college sports. Illegal traffics with agents, as in the extremely publicised instance of South Carolina based agent William? Tank? Black, charged with fraud, money laundering, and supplying illegal incentives to college jocks, has increased every bit good ( Blum ) . Marcus Camby, now of the Toronto Raptors, admits to accepting 1000s of dollars in gifts while playing college hoops at Massachusetts from athletics agents trusting to win him as a client ( Tarver ) . Paying a stipend to jocks will decrease the control bookmakers and agents can put on participants by cut downing their demand for money.
Oppositions of the wage for drama construct site college tuition as payment sufficiency and reiterate the clich? ? you can? t put a monetary value ticket on a college education. ? I think you can. At most major colleges the norm for a resident pupil is between $ 12,000 to $ 14,000 per twelvemonth ( Tarver ) . When university athletic sections are profiting from these participants, to the melody of 1000000s of dollars, and the student-athletes are having merely an instruction that they may or may non desire, it merely isn? t plenty. A scholarship is nice, but it doesn? t pay the measures for many of these participants.
If colleges and universities made money entirely from ticket gross revenues as a agency of perpetuating athleticss plans, there would be no statement over whether college jocks should be paid. The larceny occurs when colleges negotiate billion dollar telecasting and multi-million dollar indorsement contracts yearly. Those contracts and indorsements are the Acts of the Apostless of concerns looking to do money, non non-profit establishments. Colleges and universities are in the concern of doing money whether they admit to it or non, and they use student-athletes to make it. Paying them would non merely be just, but good to both the student-athletes and the schools they represent.
Blum, Deborah. ? Learning the Agents? Game: New Rules set to Protect Athletes Still in School. ?
USA Today 28 September 2000: C3
Martinez, Mark. ? Show Them the Money! ? Student.Com. 26 Sept. 1997. 15 Nov. 2000