Summary of the Island of the Wind and Wind Power Puffery
In “The Island of the Wind” the author Elizabeth Kolbert states that the finding of new creative solutions to reduce excess carbon discharges, and the building of reusable energy models have been found as new answers to climate change and fuel derived from prehistoric organisms. In this article it discusses how power is one of the basic and essential needs of our planet. It is the basis of mostly everything from the function of our homes to automobiles; therefore, to reduce the carbon footprint a group of individuals came together and created a new innovative solution involving geothermal power.
In the early 2000’s results started showing that hydrocarbon deposit use had been reduced to half the amount which was once used. Years later, the importation of electromagnetisms was no longer a must because, the land was instead transporting it to other places, and the amount of production which was being done used from reusable material came out with the outcome of producing more energy than it was using. The invention of machines with rotors played a huge role in this project.
Need essay sample on "Summary of the Island of the Wind and Wind Power Puffery" ? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page
It generated anywhere from the middle of twenty million to eighty million each year. With the total of these numbers, there was enough demand in meeting all of the lands supply of electromagnetism, along with supplying the entire population. In addition to these energy machines, there was also teleheating. This system was being used for distributing space heating and aquatic heating to generated locations such as residential and commercial living. However, in order for telaheating to properply run one main source must be present.
In this case that would biological material from living, or recently living organisms. Therefore, this process provides higher efficiencies and cuts more than twenty hundrend tons of carbonic acid yearly. On the other hand, in the article “Wind Power Puffery” written by H. Sterling Burnett, the author argues that geothermal power is often overly praised with the results it claims to have which to him is nothing convincing because it has no positive impact on the habitat.
Instead, it only causes major damage and ruins to flying spices which is often greatly forgotten, and in addition requires a high amount of expenses. It is stated that large groups of wind-driven generators only function when the draft of air blows in a certain direction at an exact rate of motion; therefore, producing a minor amount of power, but requiring large units of land. Now, because of such small power production results hydroelectric power is forced to be used in order to make up for the loss.
Due to this combination of power transmission of carbonic acid is released and air is being polluted. In addition, these large generated fields greatly interfere with the outcome of deaths in wildlife putting different breeds at risk. Since these machines are constantly turning, wildlife is being caught and killed. In reaction to both articles the “Wind Power Puffery” is the most logical to agree with, for it proves many good points. The fact that one field of generated motors requires thousands of square miles and produces very little power, proves it is not worth maintaining.
Instead of keeping this huge amount of unneeded motors the land can be used for different projects which will produce consist positive results. Solar power has very little to almost no significant result in reduction of carbonic acid exhaust. In Addition, these solar powered generators are very deceptive and unpredictable to when one will work. Due to this, the reliability of one is highly undependable to when it will produce power. The amount of power one can give is nothing compared to how much one can produce without the use of these generated motors.
The biggest factor which constantly plays in question of whether or not one will work is due to the acceleration of the current air stream. Since, the predictions of weather are not always correct one can never truly know how much exact power will be produced; therefore, it is always left in question. In all, these air generators serve no real purpose. Personally, on my behalf I see no point in putting money into such an operation, when the function of one is always left to uncertainty and results are extremely minimal results.
Why go through such a hassle of building generators when the state next door can be using twice the amount of power as you, therefore basically making up all the carbonic acid which you saved by not releasing out and polluting the air. In all, one might see this as a way of controling the amount of carbonic acid tramssmission when really its just a huge mess which serves no major purpose. Everyone should either switch to generated planation fields or keep using electic power, because if both are around one will always be defeated and very little change in the atmosphere will be seen.