Because of animal experimentation science developed to support-life frame causing. Animal to suffer is in undesirable and contradicting animal’s rights.
Science experimentation has been necessary for medical purpose. And for the researchers to support life-saving, for the majority it is contradictory for ethical. Rightness or wrongness injuries to animals not necessarily. According to Francis Thompson” Nothing begin, and nothing ends, that is not paid with moan; for we are born in other’s pain, and perish in our own”.
Ethical and dilemma brings into frame, scientist experiments tend to Centre on animal suffering and the benefits accruing for animal experimentation.
According to animal rights groups” while there is a considerable effort to develop alternatives to animal research and testing, animals will continue to be essential for the development, although humane treatment is primarily a moral and ethical responsibility, it is important to remember that scientist results rely on well-treated and well-cared for animals”.
Testing Animal will continue to be essential for the support life-saving Universities and most large companies have developed public policy statements on the use care of research animals. According to Pro-test says that stands for science the importance of animal research and also it’s brings support of life-saving medical research.
In conclusion it is contradictory human, scientist, towards animals that discriminates against animal’s rights. Painful procedures, human discriminate against other humans, and it is also it is wrong for humans to discriminate against animals.
This article talk about groups that promotes and support animal testing in medical research. Also talks about without animal test and experiments people wouldn’t be alive. Pro-test says that stands for science the importance of animal research and also it’s brings support of life-saving medical research.
This article help me to understand that it is important also to do the test and research for medical purpose to support life-saving. I pick this article because it has a different point of view that it’s necessary for medical purpose and also it’s sad that animal don’t have any other choice.
The use of animal experiments to further medical advances is a delicate issue, andnthere is no place to debate for violence. There is, however when it comes to resolving ethical tensions between animal research and experimentations scientist should be prepared to Pro-Test activist violence.
Controversial and critical human towards animals this moral argument, that is, the belief that animals and humans are equal. According to the Director of PETA the most active organization for ethical treatment of animals has been widely quoted as saying humans are “…. the biggest blight on the face of earth.” she went on to say, ” “There is no rational basis for saying that human being has special rights. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. They’re all animals.” There is ever present dilemma of choosing between the acknowledged evil of causing hurt animals ignoring suffering.
Animals may have rights but do all creatures have a right to safe medicine, remedies for disease. Because this particular ethical certainty about the rightness or wrongness of an action and consequences will disbenefit of benefits to the development of future for medical sciences for humans medicine and remedies.
